Volume 342, Issue 2 pp. 467-482

The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey – X. Lensing of background QSOs by galaxy groups

A. D. Myers

Corresponding Author

A. D. Myers

Department of Physics, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE

E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
P. J. Outram

P. J. Outram

Department of Physics, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE

Search for more papers by this author
T. Shanks

T. Shanks

Department of Physics, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE

Search for more papers by this author
B. J. Boyle

B. J. Boyle

Anglo-Australian Observatory, PO Box 296, Epping, NSW 2121, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
S. M. Croom

S. M. Croom

Anglo-Australian Observatory, PO Box 296, Epping, NSW 2121, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
N. S. Loaring

N. S. Loaring

Department of Physics, Oxford University, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH

Search for more papers by this author
L. Miller

L. Miller

Department of Physics, Oxford University, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH

Search for more papers by this author
R. J. Smith

R. J. Smith

Liverpool John Moores University, 12 Quays House, Egerton Wharf, Birkenhead CH41 1LD

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 June 2003
Citations: 12

ABSTRACT

We cross-correlate quasi-stellar objects (QSOs) from the 2dF QSO Redshift Survey with groups of galaxies. In the southern region of the 2dF we utilize galaxies from the APM Survey. In the northern strip, galaxies are taken from the recent Sloan Digital Sky Survey Early Data Release. Both galaxy samples are limited to a depth B < 20.5. We use an objective clustering algorithm to detect groups in these galaxy catalogues.

A 3σ anticorrelation is observed between 2dF QSOs and galaxy groups, confirming the effect found by Boyle, Fong & Shanks in an independent data set. This paucity of faint QSOs around groups cannot be readily attributed to a selection effect and is not due to restrictions on the placement of 2dF fibres. By observing the colours of QSOs on the scales of the anticorrelation, we limit the influence intervening dust in galaxy groups can have on background QSO flux, finding a maximum reddening on the scale of the anticorrelation of E(bjr) ≤ 0.012 at the 95 per cent level. The small amount of dust inferred from the QSO colours would be insufficient to account for the anticorrelation, supporting the suggestion by Croom & Shanks that the signal is likely to be caused by weak gravitational lensing. The possibility remains that tailored dust models involving grey dust, heavy patches of dust or a combination of dust and lensing, could explain the anticorrelation.

Under the assumption that the signal is caused by lensing rather than dust, we measure the average velocity dispersion of a singular isothermal sphere that would cause the anticorrelation, finding σ∼ 1150 km s−1. Simple simulations reject σ∼ 600 km s−1 at the 5 per cent significance level. We also suppose that the foreground mass distribution consists of dark matter haloes with an Navarro–Frenk–White (NFW) profile and measure the typical mass within 1.5 h−1 Mpc of the halo centre as M1.5= 1.2 ± 0.9 × 1015h−1 M.

Regardless of whether we utilize a singular isothermal sphere or NFW dark matter profile, our simple lensing model favours more mass in groups of galaxies than is accounted for in a universe with density parameter Ωm= 0.3. Detailed simulations and galaxy group redshift information will significantly reduce the current systematic uncertainties in these Ωm estimates. Reducing the remaining statistical uncertainty in this result will require larger QSO and galaxy group surveys.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.