Volume 30, Issue 4 pp. 302-312

The limitations of a ‘high-risk’ approach for the prevention of dental caries

Paul Batchelor

Paul Batchelor

Dental Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Free and University College London School, University College London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Aubrey Sheiham

Aubrey Sheiham

Dental Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Free and University College London School, University College London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 July 2002
Citations: 74
Paul Batchelor, Dental Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1–19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 8BT, UK
Tel: +44 20 79152337
Fax: +44 20 72441127
e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Abstract – The decline in the prevalence of caries has lead several authors to advocate the adoption of a ‘high-risk’ approach for caries preventive strategies. This paper analyses such an approach. It argues that the distribution of caries within a population follows certain laws: first, the mean caries score is a function of the prevalence; second, the variance is a function of the mean; and third, for a particular mean score, the distribution within the population is predetermined. Using data from the National Preventive Dentistry Demonstration Programme (NPDDP) in the US and the British Association for the Study of Community Dentistry (BASCD) epidemiological programmes in the UK the functions determining the distribution of caries within the population are examined. The findings indicate the changes in caries experience observed occurred throughout populations and are not confined to subgroups. Strategies limited to individuals ‘at risk’ would fail to deal with the majority of new lesions. The main emphasis should be centred on a population approach.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.