Volume 11, Issue 5 pp. 476-486

Oblique lateral cephalometric radiographs of the mandible in implantology: usefulness and reproducibility of the technique in quantitative densitometric measurements of the mandible in vivo

Jan Willem Verhoeven

Jan Willem Verhoeven

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University of Utrecht;

Search for more papers by this author
Jan Ruijter

Jan Ruijter

Department of Image Processing and Design, Faculty of Biology, University of Utrecht;

currently: Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Marco Stephan Cune

Marco Stephan Cune

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University of Utrecht;

Search for more papers by this author
Maarten Terlou

Maarten Terlou

Department of Image Processing and Design, Faculty of Biology, University of Utrecht;

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 December 2001
Citations: 10
J. W. Verhoeven, Utrecht University, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, PO Box 80.037, 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands
Tel.: +31 302533540
Fax: +31 302535537

Abstract

In the literature intraoral periapical radiographs are commonly used for densitometric measurements of the mandible with implants. These films give detailed information of the implant and the surrounding bone. However, in extreme mandibular atrophy it can be difficult to obtain intraoral radiographs of adequate diagnostic quality. Extraoral Oblique Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs (OLCRs) can then be the alternative: reproducible images of large parts of the mandible can be obtained. In vitro, the results of densitometry using periapical films and OLCRs were shown to be similar. The present study aims to determine the measurement error of densitometry with OLCRs in vivo. In 16 patients (group I) with atrophic mandible and implants, duplicate OLCRs of one side of the jaw were obtained. The error of measurement for the densitometric measurements of the mandibular bone was 5.5%. The use of a specially developed correction program to compensate for undesired variations in the projection of the soft tissues of the face (tongue, lips, cheek and neck) on the radiographs resulted in a 40% reduction of that measurement error to 3.5%. This remaining error is mainly brought about by an imperfect repositioning of the patient when the duplicate OLCRs are obtained. The error caused by the image acquisition, processing and measurement is less than 1%. Deliberate variation up to 7.5 degrees of the horizontal angle wherein the OLCRs are made, results in a large error of measurement of 13.5% (group II: 17 patients). To reduce this variation the additional soft tissue correction program is unsuitable. It is concluded from this study that the described radiographic and image analysis technique is a promising tool for prospective densitometric studies of the mandible with or without implants. Especially in mandibles with bone grafts and implants, substantial changes in the graft can occur. The described technique may be particularly valuable in analyzing these changes.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.