Volume 11, Issue 5 pp. 409-414

Can implants be correctly angulated based on surgical templates used for osseointegrated dental implants?

Munetaka Naitoh

Munetaka Naitoh

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Aichi-Gakuin University;

Search for more papers by this author
Eiichiro Ariji

Eiichiro Ariji

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Aichi-Gakuin University;

Search for more papers by this author
Shinji Okumura

Shinji Okumura

Division of Radiology, Dental Hospital, Aichi-Gakuin University;

Search for more papers by this author
Chiaki Ohsaki

Chiaki Ohsaki

Division of Dental Technology, Dental Hospital, Aichi-Gakuin University;

Search for more papers by this author
Kenichi Kurita

Kenichi Kurita

First Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Aichi-Gakuin University;

Search for more papers by this author
Tomohiko Ishigami

Tomohiko Ishigami

First Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aichi-Gakuin University, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 December 2001
Citations: 63
Munetaka Naitoh, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Aichi-Gakuin University, 2–11 Suemori-Dori, Chikusa-Ku, Nagoya 464-8651, Japan
Tel.: +81 52 759 2165
Fax: +81 52 759 2165
e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

When placing osseointegrated dental implants, the site, angulation and depth of implants can be designed using a computed tomography (CT) or conventional X-ray tomography. To correctly identify placement pre-surgically, various kinds of surgical templates have been proposed. Although it is thought to be important to use templates, no material has been published on their accuracy. The purpose of this study was to propose a method for evaluating the placement accuracy using a specific surgical template. Twenty-one implants were evaluated in 6 patients with mean age of 50.7 years. All implants were implanted by two step surgery in the posterior mandible. A surgical template based on the CT images and the abutment replica on the working models were used for the evaluation of the accuracy of implant placement. The difference between the proposed and actual directions was measured by a milling machine. The difference in the angles between the proposed direction and actual direction were from 0.5 degrees to 14.5 degrees. The average was 5.0 degrees, and there were 12 implants (57%) within 5.0 degrees. This study demonstrated the accuracy of the template described in this article.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.