Volume 10, Issue 7 pp. 704-711.e1
Original Research—CME

The Association of Clinic-Based Mobility Tasks and Measures of Community Performance and Risk

Michele L. Callisaya PhD

Corresponding Author

Michele L. Callisaya PhD

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart Tasmania, Australia

Department of Neurology & Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY

Disclosure: nothing to disclose

Address correspondence to: M.L.C., Private Bag 23, Hobart, Tasmania, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this author
Joe Verghese MBBS

Joe Verghese MBBS

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart Tasmania, Australia

Department of Neurology & Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY

Disclosures related to this publication: grant, National Institutes of Health, USA.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 January 2018
Citations: 10
This journal-based CME activity is designated for 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™ and can be completed online at www.me.aapmr.org. This activity is FREE to AAPM&R members and available to nonmembers for a nominal fee. For assistance with claiming CME for this activity, please contact (847) 737-6000.
Funded by National Institute on Aging grants (R01 AG039330, RO1AGO44007, AGO44829, and R01AG036921).
Peer reviewers and all others who control content have no financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract

Introduction

Gait speed is recognized as an important predictor of adverse outcomes in older people. However, it is unknown whether other more complex mobility tasks are better predictors of such outcomes.

Objective

To examine a range of clinic-based mobility tests and determine which were most strongly associated with measures of community performance and risk (CP&R).

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

Central Control Mobility and Aging Study, Westchester County, New York.

Participants

Aged ≥65 years (n = 424).

Methods

Clinic-based mobility measures included gait speed measured during normal and dual-task conditions, the Floor Maze Immediate and Delay tasks, and stair ascending and descending. CP&R measures were self-reported by the use of standardized questionnaires and classified into measures of performance (distance walked, travel outside one's home [life space], activities of daily living, and participation in cognitive leisure activities) or risk (balance confidence, fear of falling, and past falls). Linear and logistic regression were used to examine associations between the clinic-based mobility measures and CP&R measures adjusting for covariates.

Results

The mean age of the sample was 77.8 (SD 6.4) years, and 55.2% (n = 234) were female. In final models, faster normal walking speed was most strongly associated with 5 of the 7 community measures (greater distance walked, greater life space, better activities of daily living function, higher balance confidence, and less fear of falling; all P < .05). More complex tasks (walking while talking and maze immediate) were associated with cognitive leisure activity (P < .05), and ascending stairs was the only measure associated with a history of falls (P < .05).

Conclusion

Normal walking speed is a simple and inexpensive clinic-based mobility test that is associated with a wide range of CP&R measures. In addition, poorer performance ascending stairs may assist in identifying those at risk of falls. Poorer performance in more complex mobility tasks (walking while talking and maze immediate) may suggest inability to participate in cognitive leisure activities.

Level of Evidence

III

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.