Volume 47, Issue 3 1 pp. 750-758
Original Scientific Report

Hand-Assisted Versus Pure Minimally-Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy: Is There a Downside to Lending a Hand?

Phoebe N. Miller

Phoebe N. Miller

Department of Surgery, University of California, 513 Parnassus Avenue, HSW 1601, 94143-0790 San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Fernanda Romero-Hernandez

Fernanda Romero-Hernandez

Department of Surgery, University of California, 513 Parnassus Avenue, HSW 1601, 94143-0790 San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Patricia Conroy

Patricia Conroy

Department of Surgery, University of California, 513 Parnassus Avenue, HSW 1601, 94143-0790 San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Lucia Calthorpe

Lucia Calthorpe

Department of Surgery, University of California, 513 Parnassus Avenue, HSW 1601, 94143-0790 San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mignote Yilma

Mignote Yilma

Department of Surgery, University of California, 513 Parnassus Avenue, HSW 1601, 94143-0790 San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Sarah Mohamedaly

Sarah Mohamedaly

Department of Surgery, University of California, 513 Parnassus Avenue, HSW 1601, 94143-0790 San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Yvonne M. Kelly

Yvonne M. Kelly

Department of Surgery, University of California, 513 Parnassus Avenue, HSW 1601, 94143-0790 San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jean Feng

Jean Feng

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kenzo Hirose

Kenzo Hirose

Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kimberly Kirkwood

Kimberly Kirkwood

Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ajay V. Maker

Ajay V. Maker

Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Carlos Corvera

Carlos Corvera

Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Eric Nakakura

Eric Nakakura

Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Adnan Alseidi

Adnan Alseidi

Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mohamed A. Adam

Corresponding Author

Mohamed A. Adam

Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

[email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 November 2022
Citations: 1

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06835-z.

Abstract

Background

Hand-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (HALDP) is suggested to offer similar outcomes to pure laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). However, given the longer midline incision, it is unclear whether HALDP increases the risk of postoperative hernia. Our aim was to determine the risk of postoperative incisional hernia development after HALDP.

Methods

We retrospectively collected data from patients undergoing HALDP or LDP at a single center (2012–2020). Primary endpoints were postoperative incisional hernia and operative time. All patients had at minimum six months of follow-up. Outcomes were compared using unadjusted and multivariable regression analyses.

Results

Ninety-five patients who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy were retrospectively identified. Forty-one patients (43%) underwent HALDP. Patients with HALDP were older (median, 67 vs. 61 years, p = 0.02). Sex, race, Body Mass Index (median, 27 vs. 26), receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, gland texture, wound infection rates, postoperative pancreatic fistula, overall complications, and hospital length-of-stay were similar between HALDP and LDP (all p > 0.05). In unadjusted analysis, operative times were shorter for HALDP (164 vs. 276 min, p < 0.001), but after adjustment, did not differ significantly (MR 0.73; 0.49–1.07, p = 0.1). Unadjusted incidence of hernia was higher in HALDP versus LDP (60% vs. 24%, p = 0.004). After adjustment, HALDP was associated with an increased odds of developing hernia (OR 7.52; 95% CI 1.54–36.8, p = 0.014). After propensity score matching, odds of hernia development remained higher for HALDP (OR 4.62; 95% CI 1.28–16.65, p = 0.031) p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Compared with LDP, HALDP was associated with increased likelihood of postoperative hernia with insufficient evidence that HALDP shortens operative times. Our results suggest that HALDP may not be equivalent to LDP.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.