Volume 46, Issue 10 1 pp. 2350-2354
Original Scientific Report

Animation Supported Consent Before Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Emre Doganay

Corresponding Author

Emre Doganay

Department of Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Newark Street, E1 2AA London, UK

[email protected]Search for more papers by this author
David S. Wald

David S. Wald

Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, SW17 0QT London, UK

Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, EC1A 7BE London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Sam Parker

Sam Parker

Department of Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Newark Street, E1 2AA London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Frances Hughes

Frances Hughes

Department of Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Newark Street, E1 2AA London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 June 2022
Citations: 1

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06628-4.

Abstract

Background

Patient understanding of surgical procedures is often incomplete at the time they are performed, invalidating consent, and exposing healthcare providers to complaints and claims of failure to inform. Remote consultations, language barriers and patient factors can hinder an effective consent pathway. New approaches are needed to support communication and shared decision-making.

Methods

Multi-language digital animations explaining laparoscopic cholecystectomy were introduced at The Royal London Hospital for patients who attended for elective surgery (www.explainmyprocedure.com/lapchole). Patients completed questionnaires on the day of their procedure both before and after introduction of the animations. We assessed patient-reported understanding of the procedure, its intended benefits, the possible risks, and alternatives to treatment in 72 consecutive patients, 37 before (no animation group) and after 35 after introducing the animations into the consent pathway (animation group). Patient understanding in the two groups was compared.

Results

The two groups were well matched in respect of age, sex and whether English was their first spoken language. The proportions of patients who reported they completely understood the procedure, its benefits, risks, and alternatives in the no animation group were 54, 57, 38 and 24% and in the animation group, 91, 91, 74 and 77%, respectively; p < 0.01 for each comparison.

Conclusion

The integration of multi-language laparoscopic cholecystectomy video animations into the patient consent pathway was associated with substantial improvement in reported understanding of the procedure, benefits, risks, and alternatives to treatment. This approach can be applied across all surgical disciplines in a standardised manner in an era of accelerated elective work and remote consultations.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.