Volume 32, Issue 11 2494 pp. 2477-2482
Article

Prognosis of Japanese Breast Cancer Based on Hormone Receptor and HER2 Expression Determined by Immunohistochemical Staining

Hiroo Nakajima

Corresponding Author

Hiroo Nakajima

Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

465 Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamikyo-ku, 602-8566 Kyoto, Japan

[email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Ikuya Fujiwara

Ikuya Fujiwara

Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

Department of Translational Cancer Drug Development, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Naruhiko Mizuta

Naruhiko Mizuta

Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Koichi Sakaguchi

Koichi Sakaguchi

Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yasushi Hachimine

Yasushi Hachimine

Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Eiichi Konishi

Eiichi Konishi

Department of Pathology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Akio Yanagisawa

Akio Yanagisawa

Department of Pathology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Junji Magae

Junji Magae

Radiation Safety Research Center, Nuclear Technology Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 August 2008
Citations: 9

Abstract

Background

We classified Japanese breast cancer patients based on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 protein expression and compared their prognoses.

Methods

We compared the background and prognostic factors of 600 patients with breast cancer who were assigned to the following groups: luminal A (ER + and/or PR + and HER2-; n = 431; 71.8%), luminal B (ER + and/or PR + and HER2 + ; n = 27; 4.5%), HER2 (ER-, PR-, and HER2 + ; n = 39; 6.5%) and basal-like (BBC; ER-, PR-, and HER2-; n = 103; 17.2%).

Results

Background factors did not significantly differ among the groups. Disease-free survival rates were significantly lower for the luminal B, HER2, and BBC subtypes than for the luminal A subtype. Cancer tended to recur earlier and overall survival was significantly lower for the BBC than for the luminal A and HER2 subtypes. Overall survival rates for the luminal B, HER2, and luminal A subtypes were comparable.

Conclusions

The subtype distribution for Japanese and Caucasian patients was comparable. The prognosis for the BBC subtype was poorest among all subtypes. Breast cancer tended to recur earlier for the luminal B and HER2 subtypes than for the luminal A subtype; however, overall survival did not significantly differ among them.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.