Volume 32, Issue 11 2509
Article

Endoscopic Parathyroidectomy: Why and When?

Jean-François Henry

Corresponding Author

Jean-François Henry

Department of Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital La Timone, 264 Rue Saint-Pierre, Cedex 05 13385 Marseilles, France

[email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Frédéric Sebag

Frédéric Sebag

Department of Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital La Timone, 264 Rue Saint-Pierre, Cedex 05 13385 Marseilles, France

Search for more papers by this author
Mariya Cherenko

Mariya Cherenko

Department of Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital La Timone, 264 Rue Saint-Pierre, Cedex 05 13385 Marseilles, France

Search for more papers by this author
Giuseppe Ippolito

Giuseppe Ippolito

Department of Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital La Timone, 264 Rue Saint-Pierre, Cedex 05 13385 Marseilles, France

Search for more papers by this author
David Taieb

David Taieb

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital La Timone, Marseilles, France

Search for more papers by this author
Josiane Vaillant

Josiane Vaillant

Department of Radiology, University Hospital La Timone, Marseilles, France

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 August 2008
Citations: 41

Abstract

Background

In recent years, several new minimally invasive techniques for parathyroidectomy (MIP) have been developed. There was a rapid worldwide acceptance of mini-open procedures by most surgeons. However, the use of an endoscope remains debatable. This study was designed to determine the role of preoperative imaging studies in the decision-making for using an endoscope during MIP.

Methods

All patients with sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) and candidate for MIP underwent localizing studies. MIP was proposed only for patients in whom a single adenoma was localized by both ultrasonography and sestamibi scanning. Three locations were described: (1) posterior to the two superior thirds of the thyroid lobe; (2) at the level of or below the inferior pole of the thyroid lobe but in a plane posterior to it; (3) at the level of or below the tip of the inferior pole of the thyroid lobe but in a superficial plane. In locations 1 and 2, the nerve was considered to be at risk and an endoscopic lateral approach was indicated. In location 3, a mini-open approach was indicated.

Results

Of the 165 patients operated on for PHPT in 2006, 86 underwent MIP. According to the results of imaging studies, 39 patients presented an adenoma in location 1, 21 in location 2, and 26 in location 3. In locations 1 and 2, 59 patients (1 false-positive) had an adenoma that was located posteriorly, in close proximity to the nerve; all were cured. In location 3, 25 patients (1 false-positive) presented an inferior parathyroid adenoma superficially located; all were cured. There was no transient or permanent laryngeal nerve palsy.

Conclusions

In patients who are candidates for MIP, we recommend the use of the endoscope for the resection of parathyroid adenomas that are located deeply in the neck.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.