The effects of match congestion on gait complexity in female collegiate soccer players
Corresponding Author
Jay H. Williams
Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia
Correspondence
Jay H. Williams, HNFE Department, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorDaniel J. Jaskowak
Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia
Search for more papers by this authorDavid P. Tegarden
Departments of Accounting and Information Systems, Computer Science and Business Information Technology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jay H. Williams
Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia
Correspondence
Jay H. Williams, HNFE Department, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorDaniel J. Jaskowak
Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia
Search for more papers by this authorDavid P. Tegarden
Departments of Accounting and Information Systems, Computer Science and Business Information Technology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This investigation examined the effects of a congested match schedule on gait complexity in collegiate female soccer players. Participants were 7 female collegiate players. Each day, training and match loads were recorded during a 6-day period that included two competitive matches (separated by 66 hours) using a GPS, acceleration, and heart rate monitoring, and perceptual recovery scores. Gait was examined before each training session, during a 400 m run at comfortable pace. Spatiotemporal characteristics were computed using continuous wavelet transform, and gait complexity was assessed with detrended fluctuation analysis. High match load (HML) players played more minutes than the low match load (LML) players (78.6 ± 4.9 vs 15.8 ± 4.9 minutes, P < 0.05) and covered more total distance (TotDist) between the initial and final session (31970.5 ± 13190.9 vs 22905.5 ± 1673.1 m, P < 0.05). During this period, greater accumulated TotDist and recovery scores were associated with decreases in the gait fractal scaling index (r = −0.5 to −0.83), despite little change in spatiotemporal characteristics. This study indicates increased load during a 6-day period of training and matches alters gait complexity. It is possible that some aspect of central and/or peripheral fatigue alters motor control leading to less structured gait variability.
REFERENCES
- 1McCormack WP, Hoffman JR, Pruna GJ, et al. Reduced high-intensity-running rate in college women's soccer when games are separated by 42 hours. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015; 10: 436-439.
- 2Vescovi JD, Favero TG. Motion characteristics of women's college soccer matches: female Athletes in Motion (FAiM) study. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014; 9: 405-414.
- 3Andersson HM, Raastad T, Nilsson J, Paulsen G, Garthe I, Kadi F. Neuromuscular fatigue and recovery in elite female soccer: effects of active recovery. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008; 40: 372-380.
- 4Krustrup P, Zebis M, Jensen JM, Mohr M. Game-induced fatigue patterns in elite female soccer. J Strength Cond Res. 2010; 24: 437-441.
- 5Decker LM, Cignetti F, Stergiou N. Complexity and human gait. Rev Andal Med Deporte. 2010; 3: 2-12.
- 6Harbourne RT, Stergiou N. Movement variability and the use of nonlinear tool: principles to guide physical therapist practice. Phys Ther. 2009; 89: 267-282.
- 7Hausdorff JM, Peng C-K, Ladin Z, Wei J, Goldberger AL. Is walking a random walk? Evidence for long-range correlations in stride interval of human gait. J Appl Physiol. 1995; 78: 349-358.
- 8Hausdorff JM, Zemany L, Peng C-K, Goldberger AL. Maturation of gait dynamics: stride-to-stride variability and its temporal organization in children. J Appl Physiol. 1999; 86: 1040-1047.
- 9Hausdorff JM, Cudkowicz ME, Firtion R, Wei JY, Goldberger AL. Gait variability and basal ganglia disorders: stride-to-stride variations of gait cycle timing in Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease. Mov Disord. 1998; 13(3): 428-437.
- 10Newell D, van der Laan M. Measures of complexity during walking in chronic non-specific low back pain patients. Clin Chiropr. 2010; 13: 8-14.
10.1016/j.clch.2009.10.002 Google Scholar
- 11Meardon SA, Hamill J, Derrick TR. Running injury and stride time variability over a prolonged run. Gait Posture. 2011; 33: 36-40.
- 12Bellenger CR, Arnold JB, Buckley JD, Thewlis D, Fuller JT. Detrended fluctuation analysis detects altered coordination of running gait in athletes following a heavy period of training. J Sci Med Sport. 2018; 22: 294-299.
- 13Fuller JT, Bellenger CR, Thewlis D, et al. Tracking performance changes with running-stride variability when athletes are functionally overreached. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017; 12: 357-363.
- 14Laurent CM, Green JM, Bishop PA, et al. A practical approach to monitoring recovery: development of a perceived recovery status scale. J Strength Cond Res. 2011; 25: 620-628.
- 15Moe-Nilssen R. A new method for evaluating motor control in gait under real-life environmental conditions. Part 1: the instrument. Clin Biomech. 1998; 13: 320-327.
- 16McCamley J, Donati M, Grimpampi E, Mazzà C. An enhanced estimate of initial contract and final contact instants of time using lower trunk inertial sensor data. Gait Posture. 2012; 36: 316-318.
- 17Godfrey A, Del Din S, Barry G, Mathers JC, Rochester L. Instrumenting gait with and accelerometer: a system and algorithm examination. Med Eng Phys. 2015; 37: 400-407.
- 18Zijistra W, Hof AL. Assessment of spatio-temporal gait parameters from trunk accelerations during human walking. Gait Posture. 2003; 18: 130-10.
- 19Tessaro E, Williams JH. Validity and reliability of a 15 Hz GPS device for court-based sports movements. Sports Perform Sci Rep. 2018; 1.
- 20Peng C-K, Havlin S, Stanley HE, Goldberger AL. Quantification of scaling exponents and cross over phenomena in nonstationary heartbeat time series. Chaos. 1995; 5: 82-87.
- 21Goldberger AL, Amaral LAN, Glass L, et al. PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation. 2000; 101: e215-e220.
- 22Silva I, Moody G. An open-source toolbox for analysing and processing PhysioNet Databases in MATLAB and Octave. J Open Res Softw. 2014; 2: e27.
- 23Gates DH, Dingwell JB. Peripheral neuropathy does not alter the fractal dynamics of stride intervals of gait. J Appl Physiol. 2007; 102: 965-971.
- 24Mujika I, Burke LM. Nutrition in team sports. Ann Nutr Metab. 2010; 57: 26-35.
- 25Bangsbo J, Iaia FM, Krustrup P. Metabolic response and fatigue in soccer. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2007; 2: 111-127.
- 26Russell M, Benton D, Kingsley M. Carbohydrate ingestion before and during soccer match play and blood glucose and lactate concentrations. J Athl Train. 2014; 49: 447-453.
- 27Gunnarsson TP, Bendiksen M, Bischoff R, et al. Effect of whey protein-and carbohydrate-enriched diet on glycogen resynthesis during the first 48 h after a soccer game. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013; 23: 508-515.
- 28Ali A, Williams C. Carbohydrate ingestion and soccer skill performance during prolonged intermittent exercise. J Sports Sci. 2009; 27: 1499-1508.
- 29Nedelec M, McCall A, Carling C, Legall F, Berthoin S, Dupont G. The influence of soccer playing actions on recovery kinetics after a soccer match. J Strength Cond Res. 2014; 28: 1517-1523.
- 30Arendt-Nielsen L, Graven-Nielsen T. Muscle pain, seonsory implications and interaction with motor control. Clin J Pain. 2008; 24: 291-298.
- 31Braun WA, Dutto DJ. The effects of a single bout of downhill running and ensuing delayed onset muscle soreness on running economy performed 48 h later. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003; 90: 29-34.
- 32Paschalis V, Giakas G, Baltzopoulos V, et al. The effects of muscle damage following eccentric exercise on gait biomechanics. Gait Posture. 2007; 25: 236-242.
- 33Roberts D, Hamill-Ruth R, Parker B, Maximous S, Clark B, Nelson K. A new method for evaluating efficacy of low back pain therapy. J Pain. 2004; 5: S116.
10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.435 Google Scholar
- 34Hunter SK, Duchateay J, Enoka RM. Muscle fatigue and the mechanisms of task failure. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2004; 32: 44-49.
- 35Taylor JL, Amann M, Duchateau J, Meeusen R, Rice CL. Neural contributions to muscle fatigue: from the brain to the muscle and back again. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2016; 48: 2294-2306.
- 36Barbieri FA, Rocho dos Santos PC, Lirani-silva E, et al. Systematic review of the effects of fatigue on spatiotemporal gait parameters. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013; 26: 125-131.
- 37Kellis E, Liassou C. The effect of selective muscle fatigue on sagittal lower limb kinematics and muscle activity during level running. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009; 39: 210-220.
- 38Paavolainen L, Nummela A, Rusko H, Häkkinen K. Neuromuscular characteristics and fatigue during 10 km running. Int J Sports Med. 1999; 20: 516-521.
- 39Paterson K, Hill K, Lythgo N. Stride dynamics, gait variability and prospective falls in active community dwelling older women. Gait Posture. 2011; 33(2): 251-255.
- 40Soligard T, Schwellnus M, Alonso JM, et al. How much is too much? (Part 1) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injury. Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50: 1030-1041.