Volume 2, Issue 6 pp. 301-315
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Thoracic spine mobility, an essential link in upper limb kinetic chains in athletes: A systematic review

Nicola R. Heneghan

Corresponding Author

Nicola R. Heneghan

Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain, School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

Correspondence

Nicola R. Heneghan, Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Katie Webb

Katie Webb

Physiotherapy Department, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Tom Mahoney

Tom Mahoney

Physiotherapy Department, Sandwell General Hospital, West Bromwich, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Alison Rushton

Alison Rushton

Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain, School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 September 2019
Citations: 13

Abstract

Knowledge of the contribution of the thoracic spine movement, a requisite for UL functional movement, offers the potential for novel directions for research and management in rehabilitation. This systematic reviewed synthesized evidence of thoracic spine mobility during UL movement in athletes. Using three reviewers at each stage, key databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science) were searched up to 30/6/18. Eligibility criteria: adults age 18-40 (reflecting athletic population) and studies assessing thoracic spine and UL movement. Quality assessment was evaluated using AXIS tool and GRADE for overall quality of evidence. Seven studies were included (n = 168, mean age 26.4 years, 33% males) with n = 20 in an athlete population. Main findings were: Unilateral and bilateral UL flexion resulted in 6.7-8.0 and 12.0-12.8° thoracic extension, respectively. Unilateral and bilateral UL abduction resulted in 3.0-4.0 and 9.0-15.0 and degrees, respectively. Other thoracic spine movement (lower and upper, rotation and lateral flexion) was variable across movement planes. Overall there was unequivocal evidence of thoracic spine movement, mainly extension during UL movement and notably at the end of elevation across all planes. Findings support further targeted high-quality research and examination of thoracic mobility, an essential link in the kinetic chain, in practice.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

None.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.