Volume 22, Issue 2 pp. 968-992
TECHNICAL PAPER

One-way shear strength of wide reinforced concrete members without stirrups

Alex M. D. de Sousa

Corresponding Author

Alex M. D. de Sousa

Department of Structural Engineering, São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil

Correspondence

Alex M. D. de Sousa, Department of Structural Engineering, São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo, Av. Trabalhador Sãocarlense, 400, 13566-590, Sao Carlos, Sao Carlos, Brazil.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Eva O. L. Lantsoght

Eva O. L. Lantsoght

Politécnico, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Cumbaya, Quito, Ecuador

Concrete Structures, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Mounir K. El Debs

Mounir K. El Debs

Department of Structural Engineering, São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 May 2020
Citations: 9
Discussion on this paper must be submitted within two months of the print publication. The discussion will then be published in print, along with the authors’ closure, if any, approximately nine months after the print publication.

Funding information: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Grant/Award Number: FAPESP - 2018/21573-2 and FAPESP - 2019/20092-3

Abstract

The calibration of most analytical models that assess the shear strength of wide reinforced concrete members without shear reinforcement is based on simply supported beam tests, which may not be representative of slabs and wide members failing in shear. This paper addresses the knowledge on the shear strength of wide members, identification of their most important parameters, and an evaluation of the accuracy and precision of the main models presented in codes of practice and literature. A database of 170 shear tests was built on wide members loaded over the entire width, with the ratio width to effective depth b/d > 1. This database includes members under concentrated loads (CLs) and distributed loads (DLs) in the span direction. A parameter analysis revealed such shear strength is mostly influenced by the shear slenderness and size effect rather than by the ratio b/d. Furthermore, the results show a clear decrease in the shear strength of continuous members under DLs to higher shear slenderness, similar to the behavior of members under CLs. This trend was well observed with the proposed model of shear slenderness, which assumes that continuous members with higher bending moment in the span than over the inner support behave closer to simply supported members. A comparison of the shear capacities predicted by the physical-mechanical and semiempirical approaches showed the higher accuracy and precision of models based on the critical shear crack theory and critical shear displacement theory, regardless of the ratio b/d. Therefore, the same models derived based on beam tests are valid for wide members. Apart from that, the analyses of nonslender members with some strain-based models combined with reducing factors of the acting shear load provide accurate results of shear strength for members without stirrups.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.