Volume 22, Issue 2 pp. 607-622
TECHNICAL PAPER

Factors governing the fire response of prestressed reactive powder concrete beams

Kai Yan

Corresponding Author

Kai Yan

Key Lab of Building Structural Retrofitting and Underground Space Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, China

Correspondence

Kai Yan, Key Lab of Building structural Retrofitting and Underground Space Engineering of the Ministry of Education, School of Civil Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, China.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Jiacheng Yang

Jiacheng Yang

School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Jeung-Hwan Doh

Jeung-Hwan Doh

School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Xin Zhang

Xin Zhang

Key Lab of Building Structural Retrofitting and Underground Space Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, China

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 January 2020
Citations: 5
Discussion on this paper must be submitted within two months of the print publication. The discussion will then be published in print, along with the authors’ closure, if any, approximately nine months after the print publication.

Funding information: National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Numbers: 51408341, 51878399

Abstract

This article presents the details of a fire test on eight prestressed reactive powder concrete (RPC) beams cured with 150°C hot air. The test specimens varied in load ratio, cover thickness of tendons, bonded and unbonded tendons, and partial prestressing ratio. The thermal fields, deflection behavior, effective prestress, fire endurance, failure modes, and crack patterns of the beams were observed and recorded, revealing that no obvious fire-induced spalling occurred on the prestressed RPC beams. The fire test results indicate that the failure of prestressed RPC beams was driven by direct fire exposure and fracture of tendons and longitudinal rebars after generation of wide cracks in the beams. In extreme fire, prestressed RPC beams that were under-reinforced at ambient temperature may fail as low-reinforced beams. Fire resistance of the prestressed RPC beams dramatically improved with a decrease of load ratio and increase of cover thickness of tendons. Bonded prestressed RPC beams showed superior performance over equivalent unbonded prestressed RPC beams in fire. The whole-scale transferring effect of prestress loss in unbonded beams should be considered for fire resistance performance design based on structural systems.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.