Author's Reply
The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios, Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26:3078–3094
Peter C. Austin,
Peter C. Austin
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, G1 06, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ont., Canada M4N 3M5
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada
Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada
Search for more papers by this author
Peter C. Austin,
Peter C. Austin
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, G1 06, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ont., Canada M4N 3M5
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada
Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada
Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 April 2008
No abstract is available for this article.
REFERENCES
- 1 Austin PC. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios. Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26: 3078–3094.
- 2 Austin PC, Stafford J. The performance of two data-generation processes for data with specified marginal treatment odds ratios. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation 2008; 27(8).
- 3 Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983; 70: 41–55.
- 4 Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1984; 79: 516–524.
- 5 Austin PC, Grootendorst P, Anderson GM. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study. Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26: 734–753.
- 6 Austin PC, Mamdani MM. A comparison of propensity score methods: a case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use. Statistics in Medicine 2006; 25: 2084–2106.
- 7 Austin PC, Mamdani MM, Stukel TA, Anderson GM, Tu JV. The use of the propensity score for estimating treatment effects: administrative versus clinical data. Statistics in Medicine 2005; 24: 1563–1578.
- 8 Austin PC. A critical appraisal of propensity score matching in the medical literature from 1996 to 2003. Statistics in Medicine 2007; DOI: 10.1002/sim.3150.
- 9 Austin PC, Grootendorst P, Normand SLT, Anderson GM. Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study. Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26: 754–768.
- 10 Austin PC. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating relative risks. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2007; DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.07.011.
- 11 Greenland S. Interpretation sand choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses. American Journal of Epidemiology 1987; 125: 761–768.
