Volume 83, Issue 2 pp. 162-168
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Accuracy of elastic fusion biopsy: Comparing prostate cancer detection between targeted and systematic biopsy

Marco Oderda MD, PhD

Corresponding Author

Marco Oderda MD, PhD

Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Correspondence Marco Oderda, MD, PhD, FEBU, Department of Surgical Sciences—Urology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Simone Albisinni MD

Simone Albisinni MD

Department of Urology, University Clinics of Brussels, Erasme Hospital and Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel Benamran MD

Daniel Benamran MD

Department of Urology, Hôpitaux Universitaires Genève, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Giorgio Calleris MD

Giorgio Calleris MD

Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Mauro Ciccariello MD

Mauro Ciccariello MD

Department of Radiological, Oncological, and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Alessandro Dematteis MD

Alessandro Dematteis MD

Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Romain Diamand MD

Romain Diamand MD

Department of Urology, University Clinics of Brussels, Erasme Hospital and Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Jean-Luc Descotes MD

Jean-Luc Descotes MD

Department of Urology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, Grenoble, France

Search for more papers by this author
Gaelle Fiard MD, PhD

Gaelle Fiard MD, PhD

Department of Urology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, Grenoble, France

Search for more papers by this author
Valerio Forte MD

Valerio Forte MD

Department of Radiology, San Carlo di Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Alessandro Giacobbe MD

Alessandro Giacobbe MD

Department of Urology, Humanitas Gradenigo Hospital, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Alessandro Marquis MD

Alessandro Marquis MD

Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Giancarlo Marra MD

Giancarlo Marra MD

Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Aurel Messas MD

Aurel Messas MD

Department of Urology, Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Giovanni Muto MD

Giovanni Muto MD

Department of Urology, Humanitas Gradenigo Hospital, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Alexandre Peltier MD

Alexandre Peltier MD

Department of Urology, University Clinics of Brussels, Erasme Hospital and Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Leire Rius MD

Leire Rius MD

Department of Urology, Galdakao Hospital, Bilbao, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Giuseppe Simone MD, PhD

Giuseppe Simone MD, PhD

Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Thierry Roumeguere MD

Thierry Roumeguere MD

Department of Urology, University Clinics of Brussels, Erasme Hospital and Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Riccardo Faletti MD

Riccardo Faletti MD

Division of Radiology, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Paolo Gontero MD

Paolo Gontero MD

Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 October 2022
Citations: 3

Abstract

Introduction

When performing targeted biopsy (TBx), the need to add systematic biopsies (SBx) is often debated. Aim of the study is to evaluate the added value of SBx in addition to TBx in terms of prostate cancer (PCa) detection rates (CDR), and to test the concordance between multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) findings and fusion biopsy results in terms of cancer location.

Methods

We performed a retrospective, multicentric study that gathered data on 1992 consecutive patients who underwent elastic fusion biopsy between 2011 and 2020. A standardized approach was used, with TBx (2–4 cores per target) followed by SBx (12–14 cores). We assessed CDR of TBx, of SBx, and TBx+SBx for all cancers and clinically significant PCa (csPCa), defined as ISUP score ≥2. CDR was evaluated according to radiological and clinical parameters, with a particular focus on PI-RADS 3 lesions. In a subgroup of 1254 patients we tested the discordance between mpMRI findings and fusion biopsy results in terms of cancer location. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of CDR.

Results

CDR of TBx+SBx was 63.0% for all cancers and 38.8% of csPCa. Per-patient analysis showed that SBx in addition to TBx improved CDR by 4.5% for all cancers and 3.4% for csPCa. Patients with lesions scored as PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 were diagnosed with PCa in 27.9%, 72.8%, and 92.3%, and csPCa in 10.7%, 43.6%, and 69.3%, respectively. When positive, PI-RADS 3 lesions were ISUP grade 1 in 61.1% of cases. Per-lesion analysis showed that discordance between mpMRI and biopsy was found in 56.6% of cases, with 710 patients having positive SBx outside mpMRI targets, of which 414 (58.0%) were clinically significant. PSA density ≥0.15 was a strong predictor of CDR.

Conclusions

The addition of systematic mapping to TBx contributes to a minority of per-patient diagnoses but detects a high number of PCa foci outside mpMRI targets, increasing biopsy accuracy for the assessment of cancer burden within the prostate. High PSA-density significantly increases the risk of PCa, both in the whole cohort and in PI-RADS 3 cases.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Dr. Marco Oderda has worked as consultant for Koelis™.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, M.O., upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.