Volume 56, Issue 10 pp. 3126-3141
REVIEW

Surfactant delivery via thin catheters: Methods, limitations, and outcomes

Usha Devi DM

Usha Devi DM

Department of Neonatology, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India

Search for more papers by this author
Aakash Pandita MD, DrNB Neonatology

Corresponding Author

Aakash Pandita MD, DrNB Neonatology

Department of Neonatology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Correspondence Aakash Pandita, MD, DrNB Neonatology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow 226014, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 August 2021
Citations: 6

Abstract

Various less invasive surfactant administration strategies like surfactant replacement therapy via thin catheters, laryngeal mask airway, pharyngeal instillation, and nebulized surfactant are increasingly being practiced to avoid the harmful effects of endotracheal intubation and ventilation. Numerous studies have been done to study surfactant replacement via thin catheters whereas little data is available for other methods. However, there are variations in premedication policies, type of respiratory support used in these studies. Surfactant delivery using thin catheters has been reported to be associated with decrease in the need for mechanical ventilation (MV), duration of MV, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and neonatal mortality. With the current evidence, among all the available surfactant delivery methods, the one using thin catheters appears to be the most feasible and beneficial to improve clinical neonatal outcomes.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.