Surfactant delivery via thin catheters: Methods, limitations, and outcomes
Usha Devi DM
Department of Neonatology, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Aakash Pandita MD, DrNB Neonatology
Department of Neonatology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Correspondence Aakash Pandita, MD, DrNB Neonatology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow 226014, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorUsha Devi DM
Department of Neonatology, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Aakash Pandita MD, DrNB Neonatology
Department of Neonatology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Correspondence Aakash Pandita, MD, DrNB Neonatology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow 226014, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Various less invasive surfactant administration strategies like surfactant replacement therapy via thin catheters, laryngeal mask airway, pharyngeal instillation, and nebulized surfactant are increasingly being practiced to avoid the harmful effects of endotracheal intubation and ventilation. Numerous studies have been done to study surfactant replacement via thin catheters whereas little data is available for other methods. However, there are variations in premedication policies, type of respiratory support used in these studies. Surfactant delivery using thin catheters has been reported to be associated with decrease in the need for mechanical ventilation (MV), duration of MV, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and neonatal mortality. With the current evidence, among all the available surfactant delivery methods, the one using thin catheters appears to be the most feasible and beneficial to improve clinical neonatal outcomes.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
REFERENCES
- 1Sardesai S, Biniwale M, Wertheimer F, Garingo A, Ramanathan R. Evolution of surfactant therapy for respiratory distress syndrome: past, present, and future. Pediatr Res. 2017; 81: 240-248.
- 2 Home [Internet]. Vermont Oxford Network. [cited 2021 Mar 16]. Available from: https://public.vtoxford.org/
- 3Warren JB, Anderson JM. Core concepts: respiratory distress syndrome. NeoReviews. 2009; 10: e351-e361.
10.1542/neo.10-7-e351 Google Scholar
- 4Bahadue FL, Soll R. Early versus delayed selective surfactant treatment for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 11:CD001456.
- 5Rojas-Reyes MX, Morley CJ, Soll R. Prophylactic versus selective use of surfactant in preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012:CD000510
- 6Jobe AH Animal Models, Learning Lessons to Prevent and Treat Neonatal Chronic Lung Disease. Front Med [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 Mar 17];2. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2015.00049/full
- 7Jobe AH, Kramer BW, Moss TJ, Newnham JP, Ikegami M. Decreased indicators of lung injury with continuous positive expiratory pressure in preterm lambs. Pediatr Res. 2002; 52: 387-392.
- 8Naik AS, Kallapur SG, Bachurski CJ, et al. Effects of ventilation with different positive end-expiratory pressures on cytokine expression in the preterm lamb lung. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001; 164: 494-498.
- 9Polin RA, Carlo WA. Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American Academy of Pediatrics. Surfactant replacement therapy for preterm and term neonates with respiratory distress. Pediatrics. 2014; 133: 156-163.
- 10Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, et al. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2010; 126: 443-456.
- 11Morley CJ, Davis PG, Doyle LW, Brion LP, Hascoet J-M, Carlin JB. Nasal CPAP or Intubation at Birth for Very Preterm Infants. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 700-708.
- 12Stevens TP, Harrington EW, Blennow M, Soll RF. Early surfactant administration with brief ventilation vs. selective surfactant and continued mechanical ventilation for preterm infants with or at risk for respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; 17(4):CD003063. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003063.pub3
- 13Fischer HS, Bührer C. Avoiding endotracheal ventilation to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2013; 132: e1351-e1360.
- 14Dargaville PA, Aiyappan A, Cornelius A, Williams C, De Paoli AG. Preliminary evaluation of a new technique of minimally invasive surfactant therapy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011; 96: F243-F248.
- 15Kanmaz HG, Erdeve O, Canpolat FE, Mutlu B, Dilmen U. Surfactant administration via thin catheter during spontaneous breathing: randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2013; 131: e502-e509.
- 16Jena SR, Bains HS, Pandita A, et al. Surfactant therapy in premature babies: SurE or InSurE. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2019; 54: 1747-1752.
- 17Panza R, Laforgia N, Bellos I, Pandita A. Systematic review found that using thin catheters to deliver surfactant to preterm neonates was associated with reduced bronchopulmonary dysplasia and mechanical ventilation. Acta Paediatr. 2020; 109: 2219-2225.
- 18Verder H, Agertoft L, Albertsen P, et al. [Surfactant treatment of newborn infants with respiratory distress syndrome primarily treated with nasal continuous positive air pressure. A pilot study]. Ugeskr Laeger. 1992; 154: 2136-2139.
- 19Kribs A, Pillekamp F, Hünseler C, Vierzig A, Roth B. Early administration of surfactant in spontaneous breathing with nCPAP: feasibility and outcome in extremely premature infants (postmenstrual age </=27 weeks). Paediatr Anaesth. 2007; 17: 364-369.
- 20Dargaville PA, Aiyappan A, De Paoli AG, et al. Minimally-invasive surfactant therapy in preterm infants on continuous positive airway pressure. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013; 98: F122-F126.
- 21Mohammadizadeh M, Ardestani AG, Sadeghnia AR. Early administration of surfactant via a thin intratracheal catheter in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: feasibility and outcome. J Res Pharm Pract. 2015; 4: 31-36.
- 22Klebermass-Schrehof K, Wald M, Schwindt J, et al. Less invasive surfactant administration in extremely preterm infants: impact on mortality and morbidity. Neonatology. 2013; 103: 252-258.
- 23Krajewski P, Chudzik A, Strzałko-Głoskowska B, et al. Surfactant administration without intubation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome—our experiences. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015; 28: 1161-1164.
- 24Aguar M, Cernada M, Brugada M, Gimeno A, Gutierrez A, Vento M. Minimally invasive surfactant therapy with a gastric tube is as effective as the intubation, surfactant, and extubation technique in preterm babies. Acta Paediatr. 2014; 103: e229-e233.
- 25Teig N, Weitkämper A, Rothermel J, et al. Observational Study on less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) in preterm infants <29 weeks—short and long-term outcomes. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2015; 219: 266-273.
- 26Härtel C, Paul P, Hanke K, et al. Less invasive surfactant administration and complications of preterm birth. Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 8333.
- 27Langhammer K, Roth B, Kribs A, Göpel W, Kuntz L, Miedaner F. Treatment and outcome data of very low birth weight infants treated with less invasive surfactant administration in comparison to intubation and mechanical ventilation in the clinical setting of a cross-sectional observational multicenter study. Eur J Pediatr. 2018; 177: 1207-1217.
- 28Silahli M, Tekin M. The comparison of LISA and INSURE techniques in term of neonatal morbidities and mortality among premature infants. Acta Biomed. 2020; 91:e2020189.
- 29Göpel W, Kribs A, Ziegler A, et al. Avoidance of mechanical ventilation by surfactant treatment of spontaneously breathing preterm infants (AMV): an open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2011; 378: 1627-1634.
- 30Mirnia K, Heidarzadeh M, Hoseini MB, et al. Surfactant administration via thin catheter during spontaneous breathing: randomized controlled trial in alzahra hospital. Iranian J Neonatol. 2013; 4: 5-9.
- 31Kribs A, Roll C, Göpel W, et al. Nonintubated surfactant application vs conventional therapy in extremely preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2015; 169: 723-730.
- 32Bao Y, Zhang G, Wu M, Ma L, Zhu J. A pilot study of less invasive surfactant administration in very preterm infants in a Chinese tertiary center. BMC Pediatr. 2015; 15: 21.
- 33Olivier F, Nadeau S, Bélanger S, et al. Efficacy of minimally invasive surfactant therapy in moderate and late preterm infants: a multicentre randomized control trial. Paediatr Child Health. 2017; 22: 120-124.
- 34Halim A, Shirazi H, Riaz S, Gul SS, Ali W. Less invasive surfactant administration in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019; 29: 226-330.
- 35Wang X-A, Chen L-J, Chen S-M, Su P-H, Chen J-Y. Minimally invasive surfactant therapy versus intubation for surfactant administration in very low birth weight infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Neonatol. 2020; 61: 210-215.
- 36Yang G, Hei M, Xue Z, Zhao Y, Zhang X, Wang C. Effects of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) via a gastric tube on the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants aged 32 to 36 weeks. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99:e19216.
- 37Borszewska-Kornacka MK, Kostuch M, Korbal P, Krajewski P, Polish RDS Study Group. Strategies of using surfactant: results of the first polish national survey of daily practice. Dev Period Med. 2015; 19: 271-276.
- 38Klotz D, Porcaro U, Fleck T, Fuchs H. European perspective on less invasive surfactant administration-a survey. Eur J Pediatr. 2017; 176: 147-154.
- 39Fernandez C, Boix H, Camba F, Comuñas JJ, Castillo F. Less invasive surfactant administration in Spain: a survey regarding its practice, the target population, and premedication use. Am J Perinatol. 2020; 37: 277-280.
- 40Bhayat S, Kaur A, Premadeva I, Reynolds P, Gowda H. Survey of less invasive surfactant administration in England, slow adoption and variable practice. Acta Paediatr. 2020; 109: 505-510.
- 41Kurepa D, Perveen S, Lipener Y, Kakkilaya V. The use of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) in the United States with review of the literature. J Perinatol. 2019; 39: 426-432.
- 42Bohlin K, Bouhafs RKL, Jarstrand C, Curstedt T, Blennow M, Robertson B. Spontaneous breathing or mechanical ventilation alters lung compliance and tissue association of exogenous surfactant in preterm newborn rabbits. Pediatr Res. 2005; 57: 624-630.
- 43Gupta BK, Saha AK, Mukherjee S, Saha B. Minimally invasive surfactant therapy versus InSurE in preterm neonates of 28 to 34 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome on non-invasive positive pressure ventilation—a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2020; 179: 1-7.
- 44Hong H, Li X-X, Li J, Zhang Z-Q. High-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory support in preterm infants: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021; 34: 259-266.
- 45Dargaville PA, Kamlin CO, De Paoli AG, et al. The OPTIMIST-A trial: evaluation of minimally-invasive surfactant therapy in preterm infants 25-28 weeks gestation. BMC Pediatr. 2014; 14: 213.
- 46De Jaegere AP, van der Lee JH, Canté C, van Kaam AH. Early prediction of nasal continuous positive airway pressure failure in preterm infants less than 30 weeks gestation. Acta Paediatr. 2012; 101: 374-379.
- 47Aldana-Aguirre JC, Pinto M, Featherstone RM, Kumar M. Less invasive surfactant administration versus intubation for surfactant delivery in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017; 102: F17-F23.
- 48Dargaville PA, Ali SKM, Jackson HD, Williams C, De, Paoli AG. Impact of minimally invasive surfactant therapy in preterm infants at 29-32 weeks gestation. Neonatology. 2018; 113: 7-14.
- 49Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, et al. European consensus guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome - 2019 update. Neonatology. 2019; 115: 432-450.
- 50Göpel W, Kribs A, Härtel C, et al. Less invasive surfactant administration is associated with improved pulmonary outcomes in spontaneously breathing preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2015; 104: 241-246.
- 51Vento M, Bohlin K, Herting E, Roehr CC, Dargaville PA. Surfactant Administration via thin catheter: a practical guide. Neonatology. 2019; 116: 211-226.
- 52Legge NA, Shein D, Callander I. Methods of surfactant administration and early ventilation in neonatal intensive care units in New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2019; 12(3): 255-263.
- 53Berneau P, Nguyen Phuc Thu T, Pladys P, Beuchée A Impact of surfactant administration through a thin catheter in the delivery room: A quality control chart analysis coupled with a propensity score matched cohort study in preterm infants. PLoS One [Internet]. 2018, 13 [cited 2021 Mar 28];13. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6291238/
- 54Li X-F, Cheng T-T, Guan R-L, et al. Effects of different surfactant administrations on cerebral autoregulation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2016; 36: 801-805.
- 55Ramos-Navarro C, Sánchez-Luna M, Zeballos-Sarrato S, González-Pacheco N. Less invasive beractant administration in preterm infants: a pilot study. Clinics. 2016; 71: 128-134.
- 56Maiwald CA, Neuberger P, Vochem M, Poets C. Quick SF: a new technique in surfactant administration. NEO. 2017; 111: 211-213.
- 57Maiwald CA, Neuberger P, Franz AR, et al. Clinical evaluation of an application aid for less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA). Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021; 106: 211-214.
- 58de Kort E, Kusters S, Niemarkt H, et al. Quality assessment and response to less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) without sedation. Pediatr Res. 2020; 87: 125-130.
- 59Templin L, Grosse C, Andres V, et al. A quality improvement initiative to reduce the need for mechanical ventilation in extremely low gestational age neonates. Am J Perinatol. 2017; 34: 759-764.
- 60Dekker J, Lopriore E, van Zanten HA, Tan RNGB, Hooper SB, Te Pas AB. Sedation during minimal invasive surfactant therapy: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019; 104: F378-F383.
- 61Chevallier M, Durrmeyer X, Ego A, Debillon T, PROLISA Study Group. Propofol versus placebo (with rescue with ketamine) before less invasive surfactant administration: study protocol for a multicenter, double-blind, placebo controlled trial (PROLISA). BMC Pediatr. 2020; 20: 199.
- 62Janssen LC, Van Der Spil J, van Kaam AH, et al. Minimally invasive surfactant therapy failure: risk factors and outcome. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019; 104: F636-F642.
- 63Seo MY, Shim GH, Chey MJ. Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy via Tracheal Catheterization in Neonates with a Gestational Age of 30 Weeks or More Diagnosed with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Neonatal Medicine. 2018; 25: 109-117.
10.5385/nm.2018.25.3.109 Google Scholar
- 64Fabbri L, Klebermass-Schrehof K, Aguar M, et al. Five-country manikin study found that neonatologists preferred using the LISAcath rather than the angiocath for less invasive surfactant administration. Acta Paediatr. 2018; 107: 780-783.
- 65Buyuktiryaki M, Alarcon-Martinez T, Simsek GK, et al. Five-year single center experience on surfactant treatment in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: LISA vs INSURE. Early Hum Dev. 2019; 135: 32-36.
- 66Herting E, Härtel C, Göpel W. Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA): chances and limitations. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019; 104: F655-F659.
- 67Herting E, Härtel C, Göpel W. Less invasive surfactant administration: best practices and unanswered questions. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2020; 32: 228-234.
- 68Jeffreys E, Hunt K, Dassios T, Greenough AUK. survey of less invasive surfactant administration. Archives of Disease in Childhood—Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 2019; 104: F567.
- 69De Luca D, Luca DD, Minucci A, Gentile L, Capoluongo ED. Surfactant inadvertent loss using feeding catheters or endotracheal tubes. Am J Perinatol. 2014; 31: 209-212.
- 70Fujioka K, Kuroda J, Yamana K, Iijima K, Morioka I. Loss of Surfacten® during bolus administration with a feeding catheter. Pediatr Int. 2017; 59: 1174-1177.
- 71Jourdain G, De Tersant M, Dell'Orto V, Conti G, De Luca D. Continuous positive airway pressure delivery during less invasive surfactant administration: a physiologic study. J Perinatol. 2018; 38: 271-277.
- 72Ng EH, Shah V. Guidelines for surfactant replacement therapy in neonates. Paediatr Child Health. 2021; 26: 35-49.
- 73Lau CSM, Chamberlain RS, Sun S. Less invasive surfactant administration reduces the need for mechanical ventilation in preterm infants: a meta-analysis. Glob Pediatr Health. 2017; 4:2333794X17696683.
- 74Hanke K, Rausch TK, Paul P, et al. The effect of less invasive surfactant administration on cerebral oxygenation in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2020; 109: 291-299.
- 75Bellos I, Fitrou G, Panza R, Pandita A. Comparative efficacy of methods for surfactant administration: a network meta-analysis [online ahead of print]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2020-319763
- 76De Luca D, de Winter JP. Less invasive surfactant administration: all that glitters is not gold. Eur J Pediatr. 2020; 179: 1295-1296.
- 77Cao Z-L, Pan J-J, Shen X, et al. Less invasive surfactant administration in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome—an updated meta-analysis. J Chinese Me Assoc. 2020; 83: 170-179.
- 78Cogo PE, Facco M, Simonato M, et al. Dosing of porcine surfactant: effect on kinetics and gas exchange in respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatrics. 2009; 124: e950-e957.
- 79Pérez-Iranzo A, Jarque A, Toledo JD, Tosca R. Less invasive surfactant administration reduces incidence of severe intraventricular haemorrage in preterms with respiratory distress syndrome: a cohort study. J Perinatol. 2020; 40: 1185-1192.
- 80Isayama T, Iwami H, McDonald S, Beyene J. Association of noninvasive ventilation strategies with mortality and bronchopulmonary dysplasia among preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016; 316: 611-624.
- 81Aly H, Badawy M, Tomerak RH, El-Kholy AA, Hamed AS. Tracheal colonization in preterm infants supported with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatr Int. 2012; 54: 356-360.
- 82Porath M, Korp L, Wendrich D, Dlugay V, Roth B, Kribs A. Surfactant in spontaneous breathing with nCPAP: neurodevelopmental outcome at early school age of infants ≤27 weeks. Acta Paediatr. 2011; 100: 352-359.
- 83Márquez Isidro E, Sánchez Luna M, Ramos-Navarro C. Long-term outcomes of preterm infants treated with less invasive surfactant technique (LISA). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019; 34: 1-6.
- 84Mehler K, Broer A, Roll C, et al. Developmental outcome of extremely preterm infants is improved after less invasive surfactant application: developmental outcome after LISA. Acta Paediatr. 2021; 110: 818-825.
- 85Polglase GR, Miller SL, Barton SK, et al. Respiratory support for premature neonates in the delivery room: effects on cardiovascular function and the development of brain injury. Pediatr Res. 2014; 75: 682-688.
- 86Pandita A, Panza R. SURE or INSURE. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020;Jan 55(1): 18-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.24573. Epub 2019 Nov 15. PMID: 31730302.