Volume 56, Issue 10 pp. 3258-3264
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Effect of prone and supine positioning on the diaphragmatic work of breathing in convalescent preterm infants

Gabriel Dimitriou PhD

Gabriel Dimitriou PhD

Department of Pediatrics, University General Hospital of Patras, Patras Medical School, Rio, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
Asimina Tsintoni MD

Asimina Tsintoni MD

Department of Pediatrics, University General Hospital of Patras, Patras Medical School, Rio, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
Aggeliki Vervenioti PhD

Aggeliki Vervenioti PhD

Department of Pediatrics, University General Hospital of Patras, Patras Medical School, Rio, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
Despina Papakonstantinou PhD

Despina Papakonstantinou PhD

Department of Pediatrics, University General Hospital of Patras, Patras Medical School, Rio, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
Theodore Dassios PhD, FRCPCH

Corresponding Author

Theodore Dassios PhD, FRCPCH

Neonatal Intensive Care Centre, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK

Correspondence Theodore Dassios, Neonatal Intensive Care Centre, 4th Floor Golden Jubilee Wing, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 July 2021
Citations: 8

This project was undertaken in the University General Hospital of Patras, Greece.

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the work of breathing in the prone and supine positions in convalescent prematurely born infants.

Working Hypothesis

The work of breathing would be lower in the prone compared to the supine position.

Study Design

Prospective observational cohort study.

Patient-Subject Selection

Consecutive preterm infants breathing unsupported in room air with a gestational age of 28–34 weeks in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit were studied before discharge from neonatal care.

Methodology

The diaphragmatic pressure time product (PTPdi) was used to assess the work of breathing, calculated as the integration of transdiaphragmatic pressure over the inspiratory time. The PTPdi was measured in prone, supine, and supine with 45° head-up tilt (supine-tilt) positions.

Results

The mean (SD) PTPdi was lower in the prone (259 [68] cm H2O*s/min) compared with the supine position (320 [78] cm H2O*s/min, p= .005). The mean (SD) PTPdi was lower in the supine-tilt position (262 [76] cm H2O*s/min) compared with the supine position (p = .032). The PTPdi was not different between the prone and supine-tilt positions (p = .600). The difference in PTPdi between prone and supine was not independently associated with gestational age (standardized coefficient = 0.262, adjusted p= .335), birth weight (standardized coefficient = −0.249, adjusted p= .394) or postmenstrual age at study (standardized coefficient = −0.025, adjusted p= .902).

Conclusions

In convalescent preterm neonates, the work of breathing may be lower in the prone and supine-tilt positions, compared with supine.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data can be made available upon request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.