Volume 28, Issue 12 pp. 2396-2405
PAPER

Validation of a biopsychosocial distress screening tool, “You, Your Family and COH Are a Team”

F. Lennie Wong

F. Lennie Wong

Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, California

Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, California

Search for more papers by this author
Tracey Stiller

Tracey Stiller

Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, California

Search for more papers by this author
Richard Obenchain

Richard Obenchain

Department of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, California

Search for more papers by this author
Cristina David

Cristina David

Department of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, California

Search for more papers by this author
Sunita K. Patel

Sunita K. Patel

Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, California

Department of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, California

Search for more papers by this author
Bin Xie

Bin Xie

School of Community and Global Health, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA

Search for more papers by this author
Matthew Loscalzo

Matthew Loscalzo

Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, California

Department of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, California

Search for more papers by this author
Karen Clark

Corresponding Author

Karen Clark

Department of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, California

Correspondence

Karen Clark, MS, Department of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010-3000, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 October 2019
Citations: 12

Abstract

Objective

We examined the psychometric properties of a biopsychosocial screening tool “You, Your Family and City of Hope are a Team” implemented via touchpad technology (YYFcore03) at a cancer center in newly diagnosed patients and patients on active treatment, with the primary objective to evaluate concurrent validity with screening criterion measures of depression and anxiety.

Methods

YYFcore03, Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9], and Generalized Anxiety Disorder [GAD-7] were administered to 608 patients in out-patient clinics. A subset of 158 patients responding a second time to YYFcore03 at a subsequent visit were included for assessing reliability. Exploratory factor analysis followed by confirmatory factor analysis were conducted to identify underlying factors. The identified factor of psychological distress (PD) was then correlated with PHQ-9 and GAD-7 for concurrent validity and to estimate sensitivity-specificity. Demographic and clinical variables associated with the PD score were identified. Test-retest reliability of PD score was examined.

Results

Factor analysis suggested three factors, including PD. Correlations between PD score and PHQ-9 and GAD-7 were 0.63 and 0.67, respectively. Treating PHQ-9 and GAD-7 as criterion measures, PD score had a sensitivity of 0.77 for identifying depression and 0.86 for identifying anxiety. Younger age, lower household income, and cancer (vs noncancer) diagnosis were independently associated with worse PD score. Omega total for composite reliability was 0.88; intraclass correlation was 0.78.

Conclusions

The YYFcore03 administered via touchpad is a valid instrument for identifying PD in newly diagnosed patients and patients undergoing active treatment.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.