Decision-making preferences and information needs among Greek breast cancer patients
Augoustina Almyroudi
Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Greece
Search for more papers by this authorLesley F. Degner
Faculty of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorVassiliki Paika
Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Greece
Search for more papers by this authorNicholaos Pavlidis
Department of Medical Oncology, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Thomas Hyphantis
Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Greece
Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina 45110, GreeceSearch for more papers by this authorAugoustina Almyroudi
Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Greece
Search for more papers by this authorLesley F. Degner
Faculty of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorVassiliki Paika
Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Greece
Search for more papers by this authorNicholaos Pavlidis
Department of Medical Oncology, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Thomas Hyphantis
Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Greece
Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina 45110, GreeceSearch for more papers by this authorAbstract
Objectives: We aimed at assessing Greek breast cancer patients' preferences for participation in treatment decision making and their information needs.
Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 329 breast cancer patients were administered at the Control Preferences Scale, a card-sort measurement designed to elicit preferences for participation in decision making. Information needs were assessed with Cassileth's Information Styles Questionnaire.
Results: The majority of patients (71.1%) preferred to play a passive role in treatment decision making, with most of them wanting to delegate responsibility of the decision completely to their doctor (45.3%). A collaborative role was preferred by 24%, whereas only 4.6% chose an active role. Most women expressed a general desire for as much information as possible about their illness (62.6%), but a substantial proportion (37.4%) did not want detailed information; instead, they wished to avoid awareness of bad news. Women who desired less informational details and preferred a passive role requested less frequently a mammography (p<0.001) and/or Pap test (p<0.0005) prediagnostically.
Conclusions: This study's findings showed that the proportion of patients who wanted to play a passive role in decision making is the highest reported compared to similar studies from other countries, indicating the impact of the dominating paternalistic model of the doctor–patient relationship in the Greek medical encounter. The association of desired information details and decision-making preferences with screening for cancer procedures prediagnostically highlights the significance of providing the patients with the appropriate information and the choices available for their treatment. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
References
- 1Degner LF, Sloan JA. Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 941–950.
- 2Strull WM, Charles B. Do patients want to participate in medical decisions? J Am Med Assoc 1984; 252(21): 2290–2294.
- 3Emanuel EJ, Emanuel L. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. J Am Med Assoc 1994; 267(16): 2221–2226.
- 4Deber RB. Physicians in health care management: 7. The patient-physician partnership: Changing roles and the desire for information. Can Med Assoc J 1994; 151(2): 171–176.
- 5Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 1997; 44(5): 681–692.
- 6Towle A, Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. Br Med J 1999; 319: 766–771.
- 7Sandman L, Munthe C. Shared decision making, paternalism and patient choice. Health Care Anal 2009; 18(1): 60–84.
- 8Butow PN, Maclean M, Dunn SM, Tattersall MHN, Boyer MJ. The dynamics of change: cancer patients' preferences for information, involvement and support. Ann Oncol 1997; 8: 857–863.
- 9Kissane DW, Grabsch B, Love A, Clarke DM, Bloch S, Smith GC. Psychiatric disorder in women with early stage and advanced breast cancer: a comparative analysis. Aust N Z J Psych 2004; 38(5): 320–326.
- 10Somerset W, Stout SC, Miller AH, Musselman D. Breast cancer and depression. Oncology (Williston Park) 2004; 18(8): 1021–1034.
- 11Ganz PA. Psychological and social aspects of breast cancer. Oncology (Williston Park 2008; 22(6): 642–646.
- 12Hawley ST, Lantz P, Janz NK et al. Factors associated with patient involvement in surgical treatment decision making for breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns 2007; 65: 387–395.
- 13Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R. Five year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1985; 312: 665–673.
- 14Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347(16): 1227–1232.
- 15Ashcroft JJ, Leinster SJ, Slade PD. Mastectomy vs breast conservation: psychological effects of patient choice of treatment. In Psychological Issues in Malignant Disease, M Watson, S Greer (eds). Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1986.
- 16Morris J, Royle GT. Offering patients a choice of surgery for early breast cancer: a reduction in anxiety and depression in patients and their husbands. Soc Sci Med 1988; 26: 583–585.
- 17Fallowfield LJ, Hall A, Maguire GP. Psychosocial outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early stage breast cancer outside a clinical trial. Br Med J 1990; 301: 575–580.
- 18Fallowfield LJ, Hall A, Maguire P. Psychological effects of being offered choice of surgery for breast cancer. Br Med J 1994; 309: 448.
- 19Hack TF, Degner LF, Watson P, Sinha L. Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology 2006; 15(1): 9–19.
- 20Wiggers JH, Donovan KO, Redman S et al. Cancer patient satisfaction with care. Cancer 1990; 66: 610–616.
10.1002/1097-0142(19900801)66:3<610::AID-CNCR2820660335>3.0.CO;2-T CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 21Gattellari M, Butow PN, Tattersall MHN, Dunn SM, MacLeod CA. Misunderstanding in cancer patients: Why shoot the messenger? Ann Oncol 1999; 10: 39–46.
- 22Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D et al. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. J Am Med Assoc 1997; 277(18): 1485–1492.
- 23Keating NL, Guadagnoli E, Landrum MB, Borbas C, Weeks JC. Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients' desired level of involvement? J Clin Oncol 2002; 20(6): 1473–1479.
- 24Wallberg B, Michelson H, Nystedt M, Bolund C, Degner LF, Wilking N. Information needs and preferences for participation in treatment decisions among Swedish breast cancer patients. Acta Oncol 2000; 39: 467–476.
- 25Beaver K, Luker KA, Owens RG, Leinster SJ, Degner LF, Sloan JA. Treatment decision making in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Cancer Nurs 1995; 18: 1–12.
- 26Bruera E, Willey JS, Palmer JL, Rosales M. Treatment decisions for breast carcinoma: patient preferences and physician perceptions. Cancer 2001; 94(7): 2076–2080.
- 27Ferlay J, Parkin DM, Steliarova-Foucher E. Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2008. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 765–781.
- 28Trigoni M, Griffiths F, Tsiftsis D, Koumantakis E, Green E, Lionis C. Mammography screening: views from women and primary care physicians in Crete. BMC Womens Health 2008; 8: 20.
- 29Souliotis K, Lionis C. Creating an integrated health care system in Greece: a primary care perspective. J Med Syst 2004; 28: 643–652.
- 30Brotons C, Bjorkelund C, Bulc M et al. Prevention and health promotion in clinical practice: the views of general practitioners in Europe. Prev Med 2005; 40: 595–601.
- 31Degner LF, Sloan J, Venkatesh P. The control preferences scale. Can J Nurs Res 1997; 29(3): 21–43.
- 32Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March V. Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med 1980; 92: 832–836.
- 33Coombs CH. A Theory of Data. Wiley: New York, 1964.
- 34Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman & Hall: London, 1991.
- 35Miles J, Shevlin M. Applying Regression and Correlation. Sage: London, 2003; 165–191.
- 36Protiere C, Viens P, Genre D et al. Patient participation in medical decision-making: a French study in adjuvant radio-chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2000; 2: 39–45.
10.1023/A:1008390027720 Google Scholar
- 37Maly RC, Umezawa Y, Leake B, Silliman R. Determinants of participation in treatment decision-making by older breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004; 85: 201–209.
- 38Jansen SJT, Otten W, Stiggelbout AM. Factors affecting patients' perceptions of choice regarding adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006; 99: 35–45.
- 39Kahán Z, Varga K, Dudás R, Nyári T, Thurzó L. Collaborative/active participation per se does not decrease anxiety in breast cancer. Pathol Oncol Res 2006; 12(2): 93–101.
- 40Bilodeau BA, Degner LF. Information needs, sources of information and decisional roles in women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 1996; 23: 691–696.
- 41Lam W, Fielding R, Chan M, Chow L, Ho E. Participation and satisfaction with surgical treatment decision-making in breast cancer among Chinese women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2003; 80: 171–180.
- 42Sabo B, St-Jacques N, Rayson D. The decision-making experience among women diagnosed with stage I and II breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007; 102: 51–59.
- 43Lupton D. Medicine as Culture. Illness, Disease and the Body in Western Societies. Sage: London, 2003.
- 44Sutherland HJ, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Lockwood GA, Tritchler DL. Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions. J R Soc Med 1989; 82: 260–263.
- 45Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Saul J. Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres. Br J Cancer 2001; 84: 48–51.
- 46Fallowfield L, Ford S, Lewis S. No news is not good news: information preferences of patients with cancer. Psycho-Oncology 1995; 4: 197–202.
- 47Blanchard CG, Labreque MS, Ruckdeschel JC et al. Information and decision making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 1988; 27(11): 1139–1145.
- 48Brokalaki EI, Sotiropoulos GC, Tsaras K, Brokalaki H. Awareness of diagnosis, and information-seeking behavior of hospitalized cancer patients in Greece. Supp Care Cancer 2005; 13(11): 938–942.
- 49Iconomou G, Vagenakis GA, Kalofonos PH. The informational needs, satisfaction with communication, and psychological status of primary caregivers of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Supp Care Cancer 2001; 9: 591–596.
- 50Mystakidou K, Tsilika E, Parpa E, Katsouda E, Vlahos L. Patterns and barriers in information disclosure between health care professionals and relatives with cancer patients in Greek society. Eur J Cancer Care 2005; 14: 175–181.
- 51Gattellari M, Butow PN, Tattersall MHN. Sharing decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52: 1865–1878.
- 52Shepherd HL, Tattersall MHN, Butow PN. The context influences doctors' support of shared decision making in cancer care. Br J Cancer 2007; 97: 6–13.
- 53Anderson R, Funnell M, Butler P, Arnold M, Fitzgerald J, Feste C. Patient empowerment: results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 1995; 18: 943–949.
- 54Jahng KH, Martin LR, Golin CE, DiMatteo MR. Preferences for medical collaboration: patient–physician congruence and patient outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 2005; 57: 308–314.