Volume 16, Issue 8 pp. 864-887
CLINICAL GUIDANCE

AAPM&R consensus guidance on spasticity assessment and management

Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez MD

Corresponding Author

Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez MD

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA

Correspondence

Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Preeti Raghavan MD

Preeti Raghavan MD

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jessica Pruente MD

Jessica Pruente MD

Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel Moon MD, MS

Daniel Moon MD, MS

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Jefferson Moss-Magee Rehabilitation Hospital, Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Cassandra M. List MD

Cassandra M. List MD

Brooks Rehabilitation Hospital, Jacksonville, Florida, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Joseph Edward Hornyak MD, PhD

Joseph Edward Hornyak MD, PhD

Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Fatma Gul MD, MS

Fatma Gul MD, MS

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Supreet Deshpande MD

Supreet Deshpande MD

Department of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, Gillette Children's Hospital, St.Paul, Minnesota, USA

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Susan Biffl MD

Susan Biffl MD

Division Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine Department of Orthopedic Surgery, UCSD Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Zainab Al Lawati MD, MEd, FRCPC, FAAPMR

Zainab Al Lawati MD, MEd, FRCPC, FAAPMR

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Abraham Alfaro PhD, DO

Abraham Alfaro PhD, DO

Rehabilitation Medicine, AtlantiCare Health Services, Inc., Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC), Atlantic City, New Jersey, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 May 2024
Citations: 7

Abstract

Background

The American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AAPM&R) conducted a comprehensive review in 2021 to identify opportunities for enhancing the care of adult and pediatric patients with spasticity. A technical expert panel (TEP) was convened to develop consensus-based practice recommendations aimed at addressing gaps in spasticity care.

Objective

To develop consensus-based practice recommendations to identify and address gaps in spasticity care.

Methods

The Spasticity TEP engaged in a 16-month virtual meeting process, focusing on formulating search terms, refining research questions, and conducting a structured evidence review. Evidence quality was assessed by the AAPM&R Evidence, Quality and Performance Committee (EQPC), and a modified Delphi process was employed to achieve consensus on recommendation statements and evidence grading. The Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) guided the rating of individual studies and the strength of recommendations.

Results

The TEP approved five recommendations for spasticity management and five best practices for assessment and management, with one recommendation unable to be graded due to evidence limitations. Best practices were defined as widely accepted components of care, while recommendations required structured evidence reviews and grading. The consensus guidance statement represents current best practices and evidence-based treatment options, intended for use by PM&R physicians caring for patients with spasticity.

Conclusion

This consensus guidance provides clinicians with practical recommendations for spasticity assessment and management based on the best available evidence and expert opinion. Clinical judgment should be exercised, and recommendations tailored to individual patient needs, preferences, and risk profiles. The accompanying table summarizes the best practice recommendations for spasticity assessment and management, reflecting principles with little controversy in care delivery.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.