Total band alignment in theoretical and experimental aspects for enhanced performance of flexible and Cd-free Cu (In,Ga)(S,Se)2 solar cell fabricated by all-dry process
Corresponding Author
Jakapan Chantana
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Japan
Research Organization of Science and Technology, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Japan
Correspondence
Jakapan Chantana and Takashi Minemoto, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1 Nojihigashi, Kusatsu 525-8577, Shiga, Japan.
Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorYu Kawano
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorAbdurashid Mavlonov
Ritsumeikan Global Innovation Research Organization, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Takashi Minemoto
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Japan
Correspondence
Jakapan Chantana and Takashi Minemoto, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1 Nojihigashi, Kusatsu 525-8577, Shiga, Japan.
Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jakapan Chantana
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Japan
Research Organization of Science and Technology, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Japan
Correspondence
Jakapan Chantana and Takashi Minemoto, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1 Nojihigashi, Kusatsu 525-8577, Shiga, Japan.
Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorYu Kawano
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorAbdurashid Mavlonov
Ritsumeikan Global Innovation Research Organization, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Takashi Minemoto
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Japan
Correspondence
Jakapan Chantana and Takashi Minemoto, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1 Nojihigashi, Kusatsu 525-8577, Shiga, Japan.
Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorYu Kawano and Abdurashid Mavlonov are co-authors.
Funding information: NEDO
Abstract
Total band alignment parameters, which are CBO, ΔEC-TA, and ΔEC-TB values, in the Cu (In,Ga)(S,Se)2 (CIGSSe) solar cells are theoretically and experimentally optimized. Conduction band minimum (EC) difference between the CIGSSe absorber and buffer is represented by CBO, and that between absorber and transparent conductive oxide (TCO) is denoted by ΔEC-TA. The EC difference between buffer and TCO is represented by ΔEC-TA. Based on the measurement of photoelectron yield spectroscopy, the actual CBO, ΔEC-TA, and ΔEC-TB values are disclosed. According to the numerical simulation, the useful overview information about the appropriate CBO, ΔEC-TA, and ΔEC-TB values is disclosed for the selections of the suitable buffer and TCO materials to reduce the carrier recombination, thus enhancing the photovoltaic performances of the CIGSSe solar cell. As a result, the sputtered Zn0.84Mg0.16O buffer and sputtered Zn0.88Mg0.12O:Al TCO layers are experimentally applied for the appropriate CBO of +0.11 eV, ΔEC-TA of +0.16 eV, and ΔEC-TB of +0.05 eV, thus giving rise to the flexible, Cd-free, and all-dry process CIGSSe solar cell on stainless steel substrate with the increased conversion efficiency up to 15.3% (and the highest one of 16.5%) as the eco-friendly and low-cost solar cell. It is ultimately suggested that the experimental results are well predicted by the overview numerical results, which are useful for the improvement of the photovoltaic performances through the total band alignment.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no computing financial interest.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
pip3616-sup-0001-pip-22-128-File012.docxWord 2007 document , 1.6 MB |
Table S1 The deposition conditions of the Zn1-xMgxO and Zn1-xMgxO:Al films by the co-sputtering process under room temperature (25°C). Table S2 Simulation parameters for each layer in the flexible and Cd-free CIGSSe solar cells with a structure in Figure S1 consisting of CIGSSe absorber/buffer/TCO using SCAPS. Table S3 Numerical photovoltaic performances of the flexible and Cd-free CIGSSe solar cells with a structure in Figure S1 based on input parameters in Table S2, where the degenerate TCO with Fn of TCO > EC of TCO as well as the TCO with Fn of TCO = EC of TCO are applied in the device. Here, in a case of the degenerate TCO with Fn of TCO > EC of TCO, the ΔEC-TA is defined by Fn of TCO – EC of CIGSSe absorber. The EC of CIGSSe absorber is −3.94 eV. In a case of the TCO with Fn of TCO = EC of TCO, the ΔEC-TA is defined by EC of TCO – EC of CIGSSe absorber. Their corresponding energy band diagrams in Table S3 are depicted in Figure S6. Here, the CBO is fixed at +0.11 eV. The EV, EC, Fn, electronic Eg, and optical Eg are shown in Table S3. Table S4 Simulation parameters for each layer in the flexible and Cd-free CIGSSe solar cells with a structure in Figure S1 consisting of CIGSSe absorber/buffer/TCO using SCAPS. Table S5 The CBO, ΔEC-TA, ΔEC-TB, and numerical photovoltaic performances at positions I, II, and III in Figure S14. The CBO is kept at 0 eV, leading to the ΔEC-TA equal to the ΔEC-TB. Figure S1. Schematic layers of the flexible and Cd-free CIGSSe solar cells fabricated by all-dry process with a structure of SUS/glass (SiO2)/Mo/CIGSSe absorber/buffer/TCO. In this experiment, the Zn1-xMgxO and Zn1-xMgxO:Al were applied as buffers and TCO layers, respectively. The Mg content ([Mg]/([Mg] + [Zn])) of Zn1-xMgxO was varied from 0 (pure ZnO) to 0.41, whereas that of the Zn1-xMgxO:Al was changed from 0 (pure ZnO:Al) to 0.19, respectively. Figure S2. Conduction and valence bands of the CIGSSe solar cells with a structure in Figure S1 for the determinations of CBO, ΔEC-TA, and ΔEC-TB values. The CBO is determined by EC of buffer – EC of absorber, and ΔEC-TA is defined by EC of TCO – EC of absorber. The ΔEC-TB is calculated by EC of TCO – EC of buffer. The corresponding conduction bands in the case of CBO, ΔEC-TA, and ΔEC-TB values of over 0 (spike-like formation) are shown in Figure S3(a). The corresponding conduction bands in the case of CBO, ΔEC-TA, and ΔEC-TB values of below 0 (cliff-like formation) are presented in Figure S3(b). Figure S3. Conduction bands in the CIGSSe device in Figure S1 in the case of (a) CBO, ΔEC-TA, and ΔEC-TB values of over 0 (spike-like formation) as well as (b) CBO, ΔEC-TA, and ΔEC-TB values of below 0 (cliff-like formation). Zn1-xMgxO and Zn1-xMgxO:Al are denoted by ZMO and AZMO, respectively. Figure S4 Examples of (a) transmittance (T) and reflectance (R) of ZnO and Zn0.84Mg0.16O films on SLG substrates, as well as (b) their plots of (αhν)1 as a function of photon energy (hν). Figure S5 Examples of PYS spectra of ZnO and Zn0.84Mg0.16O films on SLG substrates. Figure S6 Zoom-in numerical energy band diagrams of the corresponding solar cells in Table S3 in cases of the degenerate TCO with Fn of TCO > EC of TCO and the TCO with Fn of TCO = EC of TCO with the ΔEC-TA values of (a) -0.082 eV, (b) -0.002 eV, (c) + 0.248 eV and (d) + 0.288 eV, respectively. Fn and Fp denote the quasi-Fermi levels of electrons and holes, respectively. It is noted that the CBO is constant at +0.11 eV. The simulation was conducted under the bias of 0 V. Figure S7 Numerical conversion efficiency (η) of the flexible and Cd-free CIGSSe solar cells with a structure in Figure S1 based on input parameters in Table S2, where the degenerate TCO with Fn of TCO > EC of TCO as well as the TCO with Fn of TCO = EC of TCO are applied. Here, in a case of the degenerate TCO with Fn of TCO > EC of TCO, the ΔEC-TA is defined by Fn of TCO – EC of CIGSSe absorber. In a case of the TCO with Fn of TCO = EC of TCO, the ΔEC-TA is defined by EC of TCO – EC of CIGSSe absorber. It is noted that the CBO is constant at +0.11 eV. Figure S8 The corresponding 3D mapping images of (a) experimental η, (b) JSC, (c) FF, and (d) VOC values as functions of CBO and ΔEC-TA in Figure 5 for the flexible, Cd-free, and all-dry process CIGSSe solar cell on SUS substrates with a structure in Figure S1. The experimental CBO and ΔEC-TA values are based on Figure 1. Figure S9 The experimental J-V characteristics of the flexible, Cd-free, and all-dry process CIGSSe solar cell on SUS substrates with a structure in Figure S1 at positions A, B, and C in Figure 5, and Figure 6, as well as Table 2. The J-V characteristics of the solar cells were measured in the temperature range from 200 K to 350 K under an equivalent AM 1.5G illumination using a cryostat cooled with liquid-N2 and heated by temperature controller (Model 9,700, Scientific Instruments). Temperature is denoted by T. Figure S10 (a) JSC and (b) VOC as a function of temperature for the real Cd-free, flexible, and all-dry process CIGSSe solar cells in Figure S1 at positions A, B, and C in Figure 5, and Figure 6, as well as Table 2. The graphs were made based on Figure S9. Figure S11 Suns-VOC characteristics of the flexible, Cd-free, and all-dry process CIGSSe solar cell on SUS substrates with a structure in Figure S1 at positions A, B, and C in Figure 5, and Figure 6, as well as Table 2. The Suns-VOC characteristics were measured by WCT − 120 (Sinton Instruments). Figure S12 Mott-Schottky plots (1//C2-V) of the flexible, Cd-free, and all-dry process CIGSSe solar cell on SUS substrates with a structure in Figure S1 at positions A, B, and C in Figure 5, and Figure 6, as well as Table 2. The measurements were conducted using LCR meter (Hewlett-Packard 4284A) under a frequency of 10 kHz. The Vbi is built-in potential, and the NA are carrier density. Figure S13 The J-V characteristic of the flexible, Cd-free, and all-dry process CIGSSe solar cell on SUS substrates with a structure in Figure S1 at position B (CBO of +0.11 eV and ΔEC-TA of +0.16 eV) in Figure 5, 6 and 7, which was fabricated by all-dry process (Dry). And the J-V characteristic of the reference flexible CIGSSe solar cell with a structure of SUS/glass/Mo/CIGSSe/CBD-Zn(O,S,OH)x buffer/ZnO:B/Ni-Al grid, where the CBD-Zn(O,S,OH)x buffer was deposited by wet-process chemical bath deposition process (Wet). Heat-light soaking process at 110°C for 4 hours under AM1.5G illumination was conducted on both solar cells to further increase the photovoltaic performances.2 Figure S14 Contour maps of (a) numerical η values as functions of CBO and ΔEC-TA and (b) numerical η values as functions of CBO and ΔEC-TB for the CIGSSe solar cells with a structure in Figure S1. The simulation was conducted using SCAPS under the variations of CBO, ΔEC-TA, and ΔEC-TB values based on Table S4. The EV values in Table S4 are mainly obtained from the PYS measurement. N/A denotes not available data. The CBO at positions I, II, and III is constant at 0 eV, leading to the ΔEC-TA equal to the ΔEC-TB. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- 1Vallat-Sauvain E, Shah A, Bailat J. Thin Film Solar Cells, Fabrication, Characterization and Applications. Chichester: Wiley; 2006: 1-38.
10.1002/0470091282.ch1 Google Scholar
- 2Chantana J, Kawano Y, Nishimura T, et al. Transparent electrode and buffer layer combination for reducing carrier recombination and optical loss realizing over A 22%-efficient Cd-free alkaline-treated Cu (In,Ga)(S,Se)2 solar cell by the all-dry process. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020; 12(19): 22298-22307. doi:10.1021/acsami.0c01980
- 3Hamakawa Y. Thin-Film Solar Cells Next Generation Photovoltaics and Its Applications. Heidelberg: Springer; 2004: 1-42. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-10549-8_1.
10.1007/978?3?662?10549?8_1 Google Scholar
- 4Chantana J. Development of Cu (In,Ga)Se2 solar cell on stainless steel substrates. Deutschland: LAMBERT Academic Publishing; 2015.
- 5Jackson P, Hariskos D, Wuerz R, et al. Properties of Cu (In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with new record efficiencies up to 21.7%. Phys Status Solidi RRL. 2015; 9(1): 28-31. doi:10.1002/pssr.201409520
- 6Jackson P, Wuerz R, Hariskos D, Lotter E, Witte W, Powalla M. Effects of heavy alkali elements in Cu (In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with efficiencies up to 22.6%. Phys. Status Solidi RRL. 2016; 10(8): 583-586. doi:10.1002/pssr.201600199
- 7Kato T, Wu JL, Harai Y, Sugimoto H, Bermudez V. Record efficiency for thin-film polycrystalline solar cells up to 22.9% achieved by Cs-Treated Cu (In,Ga)(Se,S)2. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2018; 9: 325-330.
- 8Nakamura M, Yamaguchi K, Kimoto Y, Yasaki Y, Kato T, Sugimoto H. Cd-free Cu(In,Ga)(Se,S)2 thin-film solar cell with record efficiency of 23.35%. IEEE J Photovolt. 2019; 9(6): 1863-1867. doi:10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2937218
- 9Green MA, Dunlop E, Hohl-Ebinger J, Yoshita M, Kopidakis N, Hao X. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 58). Prog Photovol Res Appl. 2021; 29(7): 657-667. doi:10.1002/pip.3444
- 10Masuda T, Hirai S, Inoue M, Chantana J, Kudo Y, Minemoto T. Colorful, flexible, and lightweight Cu (In,Ga)Se2 solar cell by lift-off process with automotive painting. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2018; 8(5): 1326-1330. doi:10.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2859743
- 11Zortea L, Nishiwaki S, Weiss TP, et al. Cu (In,Ga)Se2 solar cells on low cost mild steel substrates. Solar Energy. 2018; 175: 25-30. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.057
- 12Carron R, Nishiwaki S, Yang SC, Ochoa M, Sun S, Tiwari AN. Heat-light soaking treatments for high-performance CIGS solar cells on flexible polyimide foils. In: Conference Record of the 38th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy and Conference and Exhibition (EU PVSEC); 2021 3BO.9.2.
- 13Waalkes MP. Cadmium carcinogenesis in review. J Inorg Biochem. 2000; 79(1-4): 241-244. doi:10.1016/S0162-0134(00)00009-X
- 14Nakada T, Furumi K, Kunioka A. High-efficiency cadmium-free Cu (In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells with chemically deposited ZnS buffer layers. IEEE Trans Electron Devices. 1999; 46(10): 2093-2097. doi:10.1109/16.792002
- 15Ho J, Chang S, Ho J, et al. Improving the performance of solar cells with novel buffer structure by the chemical bath deposition technique. Mater Sci Semicond Process. 2017; 59: 29-34. doi:10.1016/j.mssp.2016.09.044
- 16Siebentritt S. Alternative buffers for chalcopyrite solar cells. Solar Energy. 2004; 77(6): 767-775. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2004.06.018
- 17Minemoto T, Matsui T, Takakura H, et al. Theoretical analysis of the effect of conduction band offset of window/CIS layers on performance of CIS solar cells using device simulation. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2001; 67(1-4): 83-88. doi:10.1016/S0927-0248(00)00266-X
- 18Nakada T, Hongo M, Hayashi E. Band offset of high efficiency CBD-ZnS/CIGS thin film solar cells. Thin Solid Films. 2003; 431-432: 242-248. doi:10.1016/S0040-6090(03)00265-7
- 19Murata M, Chantana J, Ashida N, Hironiwa D, Minemoto T. Influence of conduction band minimum difference between transparent conductive oxide and absorber on photovoltaic performance of thin-film solar cell. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2015; 54(3):032301. doi:10.7567/JJAP.54.032301
- 20Chantana J, Kawano Y, Nishimura T, Mavlonov A, Negami T, Minemoto T. Mg content impact of a sputtered Zn1-xMgxO:Al transparent electrode on photovoltaic performances of flexible, Cd-free, and all-dry-process Cu (In,Ga)(S,Se)2 solar cells. ACS Applied Energy Materials. 2022: 2270-2278. doi:10.1021/acsaem.1c03783
- 21Weinhardt L, Fuchs O, Grob D, et al. Band alignment at the CdS/Cu (In,Ga)S2 interface in thin-film solar cells. Appl Phys Lett. 2005; 86(6):062109. doi:10.1063/1.1861958
- 22Chantana J, Ishino Y, Kawano Y, Nishimura T, Minemoto T. Mobility improvment of Zn1-xMgxO:Al prepared under room temperature by co-sputtering through optimizations of Al and Mg contents. Mater Sci Semicond Process. 2020; 109:104921. doi:10.1016/j.mssp.2020.104921
- 23Chantana J, Kato T, Sugimoto H, Minemoto T. Heterointerface recombination of Cu (In,Ga)(S,Se)2-based solar cells with different buffer layers. Prog Photovolt Res Appl. 2018; 26: 127-134. doi:10.1002/pip.2952
- 24Kato T, Handa A, Yagioka T, et al. Enhanced efficiency of Cd-free Cu (In,Ga)(Se,S)2 minimodule via (Zn,Mg)O second buffer layer and alkali metal post-treatment. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2017; 7(6): 1773-1780. doi:10.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2745710
- 25Kushiya K, Kuriyagawa S, Kase T, et al. The Role of Cu (InGa)(SeS)2 surface layer on a graded band-gap Cu (InGa)Se2 thin-film solar cell prepared by two-stage method. In: Conference Record of the 25th IEEE Phovoltaic Specialists Conference; 1996: 989-992.
- 26Kato TC. (In,Ga)(Se,S)2 solar cell research in solar frontier: progress and current status. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2017; 56(4S):04CA02. doi:10.7567/JJAP.56.04CA02
- 27Nakada T, Ohbo H, Watanabe T, Nakazawa H, Matsui M, Kunioka A. Improved Cu (In,Ga)(S,Se)2 thin film solar cells by surface sulfurization. Sol Energy Mater sol Cells. 1997; 49(1-4): 285-290. doi:10.1016/S0927-0248(97)00054-8
- 28Chantana J, Nishimura T, Kawano Y, et al. Aging effect of a Cu (In,Ga)(S,Se)2 absorber on the photovoltaic performance of its Cd-free solar cell fabricated by an all-dry process: its carrier recombination analysis. Adv Energy Mater. 2019; 9(47):1902869. doi:10.1002/aenm.201902869
- 29Chantana J, Kawano Y, Nishimura T, Mavlonov A, Negami T, Minemoto T. Formation of native Inx(O,S)y buffer through surface oxidation of Cu (In,Ga)(S,Se)2 absorber for significantly enhanced conversion efficiency of flexible and Cd-free solar cell by all-dry process. Solar RRL. 2022:2200250. doi:10.1002/solr.202200250
- 30Li JV, Grover S, Contreras MA, Ramanathan K, Kuciauskas D, Noufi RA. Recombination analysis of Cu (In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with low and high Ga compositions. Sol Energy Mater sol Cells. 2014; 124: 143-149. doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2014.01.047
- 31Grover S, Li JV, Young DL, Stradins P, Branz HM. Reformulation of solar cell physics to facilitate experimental separation of recombination pathways. Appl Phys Lett. 2013; 103(9):093502. doi:10.1063/1.4819728
- 32Chantana J, Kato T, Sugimoto H, Minemoto T. Investigation of correlation between open-circuit voltage deficit and carrier recombination rates in Cu (In,Ga)(S,Se)2-based thin-film solar cells. Appl Phys Lett. 2018; 112(15):151601. doi:10.1063/1.5023828
- 33Burgelman M, Nollet P, Degrave S. Modelling polycrystalline semiconductor solar cells. Thin Solid Films. 2000; 361-362: 527-532. doi:10.1016/S0040-6090(99)00825-1
- 34Burstein E. Anomalous optical absorption limit in InSb. Phys Rev. 1954; 93(3): 632-633. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.93.632
- 35Chatterji N, Antony A, Nair PR. Temperature coefficient of silicon-based carrier selective solar cells. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics. 2019; 9(3): 583-590. doi:10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2892127