Volume 30, Issue 9 pp. 1200-1213
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Sensitivity analyses of unmeasured and partially-measured confounders using multiple imputation in a vaccine safety study

Stanley Xu

Corresponding Author

Stanley Xu

Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, USA

Correspondence

Stanley Xu, Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles Ave, 5th Floor, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Christina L. Clarke

Christina L. Clarke

The Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Sophia R. Newcomer

Sophia R. Newcomer

School of Public and Community Health Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Matthew F. Daley

Matthew F. Daley

The Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA

Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jason M. Glanz

Jason M. Glanz

The Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA

School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 May 2021

Funding information: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Grant/Award Number: contract #200-2012-53582-TO 0001; Vaccine Safety Datalink project (contract #200-2012-53582)

Abstract

Purpose

Sensitivity analyses have played an important role in pharmacoepidemiology studies using electronic health records data. Despite the existence of quantitative bias analysis in pharmacoepidemiologic studies, simultaneously adjusting for unmeasured and partially measured confounders is challenging in vaccine safety studies. Our objective was to develop a flexible approach for conducting sensitivity analyses of unmeasured and partially-measured confounders concurrently for a vaccine safety study.

Methods

We derived conditional probabilities for an unmeasured confounder based on bias parameters, used these conditional probabilities and Monte Carlo simulations to impute the unmeasured confounder, and re-constructed the analytic datasets as if the unmeasured confounder had been observed. We simultaneously imputed a partially measured confounder using a prediction model. We considered unmeasured breastfeeding and partially measured family history of Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) in a study examining the association between exposure to rotavirus vaccination and T1DM.

Results

Before sensitivity analyses, the hazard ratios (HR) were 1.50 (95% CI, 0.81–2.77) for those partially exposed and 1.03 (95% CI, 0.62–1.72) for those fully exposed with unexposed children as the referent group. When breastfeeding and family history of T1DM were adjusted, the HR was 1.55 (95% CI, 0.84–2.87) for the partially exposed group; the HR was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.58–1.63) for the fully exposed group.

Conclusions

We conclude that adjusting for unmeasured breastfeeding and partially measured family history of T1DM did not alter the conclusion that there was no evidence of association between rotavirus vaccination and developing T1DM. This novel approach allows for simultaneous adjustment for multiple unmeasured and partially-measured confounders.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.