Volume 30, Issue 9 pp. 1192-1199
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Use of negative controls in a prescription sequence symmetry analysis to reduce time-varying bias

Scott Martin Vouri

Corresponding Author

Scott Martin Vouri

Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida—College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida, USA

University of Florida—Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), Gainesville, Florida, USA

Correspondence

Scott Martin Vouri, Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida—College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Xinyi Jiang

Xinyi Jiang

Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida—College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Earl J. Morris

Earl J. Morris

Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida—College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Babette A. Brumback

Babette A. Brumback

University of Florida—Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), Gainesville, Florida, USA

Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida—College of Public Health & Health Professions College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Almut G. Winterstein

Almut G. Winterstein

Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida—College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida, USA

University of Florida—Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), Gainesville, Florida, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 May 2021
Citations: 7

Abstract

Purpose

There is an increased use in the (prescription) sequence symmetry analysis (PSSA); however, limited studies have incorporated a negative control, and no study has formally quantified and controlled for within-patient time-varying bias using a negative control. Our aim was to develop a process to incorporate the effect of negative controls into the main analysis of a PSSA.

Methods

Using a previously assessed dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (DH-CCB) and loop diuretic PSSA, we directly compared the adjusted sequence ratios (aSRs) of DH-CCBs to each of the two negative control index drugs (levothyroxine and angiotensin converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor/angiotensin-2 receptor blocker [ARB]) using the ratio of the aSRs to estimate a relative aSR with a Z test. Further, we utilized the relative aSR in stratum-specific analyses and varying exposure windows.

Results

The relative aSR of DH-CCBs decreased from 1.87 to 1.72 (95% CI 1.66–1.78) using levothyroxine as a negative control index drug. ACE inhibitor/ARB negative control index drug resulted in an aSR of 1.27 thus reducing the relative aSR for DH-CBB from 1.84 to 1.45 (95% CI 1.41–1.49). When restricting the exposure window to 180 and 90 days, the relative aSR of DH-CCBs increased to 1.68 (95% CI 1.62–1.74) and 1.86 (95% CI 1.78–1.94), respectively, relative to the ACE inhibitor/ARB negative control index drug.

Conclusion

We illustrated how to incorporate negative control index drugs into a PSSA and generate relative aSRs. Stratum-specific assessments and varying the exposure windows while using negative control index drugs can yield more informative results.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.