Biodegradable scaffolds have emerged as a promising alternative to polypropylene (PP) meshes for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) due to their biocompatibility and potential for tissue regeneration.

Methods

A narrative review was conducted focusing on articles published within the last 10 years.

Results

Polymeric materials such as small intestinal submucosa (SIS), poly(lactic acid) (PLA), poly(Chitosan-g-lactic Acid) (PCLA), poly(glycolic acid) (PGA), and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) have been explored for their ability to provide mechanical support, facilitate tissue repair, and degrade in a controlled manner. Each material offers unique advantages, such as SIS's enhanced biocompatibility, PLA's mechanical strength, and PGA's rapid degradation. However, challenges remain in optimizing these materials for clinical use, including controlling degradation rates, minimizing inflammatory responses, and addressing issues related to scaffolds' mechanical properties. Moreover, integrating adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) has shown promise in enhancing tissue regeneration and angiogenesis. The primary obstacles preventing clinical implementation have been premature scaffold degradation before adequate tissue ingrowth and insufficient tensile strength in dynamic pelvic environments.

Conclusions

This review discusses the current state of biodegradable scaffolds for SUI treatment, highlighting their potential benefits, ongoing challenges, and the need for further research to ensure their safety and efficacy in clinical applications.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Open Research

Data Availability Statement

The authors have nothing to report.

References

1A. O. Khalifa, I. Isali, H. Celik, et al., “A Preliminary Evaluation of In Vivo Response to a Filament-Wound Macroporous Collagen Midurethral Sling in an Ovine Model,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part B: Applied Biomaterials 110, no. 12 (2022): 2676–2685.
10.1002/jbm.b.35120
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
2E. MacCraith, M. Joyce, R. J. F. C. do Amaral, F. J. O'Brien, and N. F. Davis, “Development and In Vitro Investigation of a Biodegradable Mesh for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence,” International Urogynecology Journal 33, no. 8 (2022): 2177–2184.
10.1007/s00192-022-05160-2
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
3G. Gigliobianco, S. Roman Regueros, N. I. Osman, et al., “Biomaterials for Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: How Can We Do Better?,” BioMed Research International 2015 (2015): 1–20.
10.1155/2015/968087
Google Scholar
4M. Cosson, P. Debodinance, M. Boukerrou, et al., “Mechanical Properties of Synthetic Implants Used in the Repair of Prolapse and Urinary Incontinence in Women: Which Is the Ideal Material?,” International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction 14, no. 3 (2003): 169–178.
10.1007/s00192-003-1066-z
PubMed Google Scholar
5E. MacCraith, F. J. O'Brien, and N. F. Davis, “Biodegradable Materials for Surgical Management of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Narrative Review,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 259 (2021): 153–160.
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.02.024
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
6W. C. Ji, X. W. Zhang, and Y. S. Qiu, “Selected Suitable Seed Cell, Scaffold and Growth Factor Could Maximize the Repair Effect Using Tissue Engineering Method in Spinal Cord Injury,” World Journal of Experimental Medicine 6, no. 3 (2016): 58–62.
10.5493/wjem.v6.i3.58
PubMed Google Scholar
7Á. Serrano-Aroca, A. Cano-Vicent, R. Sabater i Serra, et al., “Scaffolds in the Microbial Resistant Era: Fabrication, Materials, Properties and Tissue Engineering Applications,” Materials Today Bio 16 (2022): 100412.
10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100412
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
8J. I. Andorko and C. M. Jewell, “Designing Biomaterials With Immunomodulatory Properties for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine,” Bioengineering & Translational Medicine 2, no. 2 (2017): 139–155.
10.1002/btm2.10063
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
9A. Atala, “Tissue Engineering of Human Bladder,” British Medical Bulletin 97, no. 1 (2011): 81–104.
10.1093/bmb/ldr003
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
10A. Wiedemann and M. Otto, “Small Intestinal Submucosa for Pubourethral Sling Suspension for the Treatment of Stress Incontinence: First Histopathological Results in Humans,” Journal of Urology 172, no. 1 (2004): 215–218.
10.1097/01.ju.0000132148.56211.af
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
11M. Casarin, T. M. Fortunato, S. Imran, et al., “Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa (SIS) as a Suitable Scaffold for the Creation of a Tissue-Engineered Urinary Conduit: Decellularization, Biomechanical and Biocompatibility Characterization Using New Approaches,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 5 (2022): 2826.
10.3390/ijms23052826
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
12S. Roman, I. Urbánková, G. Callewaert, et al., “Evaluating Alternative Materials for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Comparison of the In Vivo Response to Meshes Implanted in Rabbits,” Journal of Urology 196, no. 1 (2016): 261–269.
10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.067
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
13A. Mangera, A. J. Bullock, S. Roman, C. R. Chapple, and S. MacNeil, “Comparison of Candidate Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering for Stress Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair,” BJU International 112, no. 5 (2013): 674–685.
10.1111/bju.12186
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
14S. Roman, M. Albersen, S. Manodoro, et al., “Acute In Vivo Response to an Alternative Implant for Urogynecology,” BioMed Research International 2014 (2014): 853610, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/853610.
10.1155/2014/853610
PubMed Google Scholar
15X. Wang, Y. Chen, Z. Fan, and K. Hua, “Comparing Different Tissue-Engineered Repair Materials for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Urinary Incontinence: Which Material Is Better?,” International Urogynecology Journal 29, no. 1 (2018): 131–138.
10.1007/s00192-017-3406-4
PubMed Google Scholar
16N. Mangır, C. J. Hillary, C. R. Chapple, and S. MacNeil, “Oestradiol-Releasing Biodegradable Mesh Stimulates Collagen Production and Angiogenesis: An Approach to Improving Biomaterial Integration in Pelvic Floor Repair,” European Urology Focus 5, no. 2 (2019): 280–289.
10.1016/j.euf.2017.05.004
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
17C. J. Hillary, S. Roman, A. J. Bullock, N. H. Green, C. R. Chapple, and S. MacNeil, “Developing Repair Materials for Stress Urinary Incontinence to Withstand Dynamic Distension,” PLoS One 11, no. 3 (2016): e0149971.
10.1371/journal.pone.0149971
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
18Y. Wang, W. Wang, X. Wang, et al., “Tissue-Engineered Sling With Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Under Static Mechanical Strain,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 14, no. 2 (2017): 1337–1342.
10.3892/etm.2017.4705
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
19B. S. Wadie, H. G. Aamer, S. M. Khater, and M. M. Gabr, “The Use of Autologous Skeletal Muscle-Derived Cells as a Sling in the Treatment of Stress-Induced Urinary Incontinence: An Experimental Study in Dogs,” Frontiers in Urology 2 (2023), https://doi.org/10.3389/fruro.2022.959583.
10.3389/fruro.2022.959583
Web of Science® Google Scholar
20R. Jankowski, R. Pruchnic, M. Hiles, and M. B. Chancellor, “Advances Toward Tissue Engineering for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence,” Reviews in Urology 6, no. 2 (2004): 51–57.
PubMed Google Scholar
21S. Siracusano, S. Ciciliato, N. Lampropoulou, A. Cucchi, F. Visalli, and R. Talamini, “Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa Implant in Pubovaginal Sling Procedure on 48 Consecutive Patients: Long-Term Results,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 158, no. 2 (2011): 350–353.
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.06.012
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
22J. S. Jones, R. R. Rackley, R. Berglund, J. B. Abdelmalak, G. DeOrco, and S. P. Vasavada, “Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa as a Percutaneous Mid-Urethral Sling: 2-Year Results,” BJU International 96, no. 1 (2005): 103–106.
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05576.x
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
23W. Zong, H. M. Zyczynski, L. A. Meyn, S. C. Gordy, and P. A. Moalli, “Regulation of MMP-1 by Sex Steroid Hormones in Fibroblasts Derived From the Female Pelvic Floor,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 196, no. 4 (2007): 349.e1–349.e11.
10.1016/j.ajog.2006.12.019
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
24G. M. Rubanyi, A. Johns, and K. Kauser, “Effect of Estrogen on Endothelial Function and Angiogenesis,” Vascular Pharmacology 38, no. 2 (2002): 89–98.
10.1016/S0306-3623(02)00131-3
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
25A. Miletić, I. Ristić, M.-B. Coltelli, and B. Pilić, “Modification of PLA-Based Films by Grafting or Coating,” Journal of Functional Biomaterials 11, no. 2 (2020): 30.
10.3390/jfb11020030
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
26Z. Guo, C. Yang, Z. Zhou, S. Chen, and F. Li, “Characterization of Biodegradable Poly(Lactic Acid) Porous Scaffolds Prepared Using Selective Enzymatic Degradation for Tissue Engineering,” RSC Advances 7, no. 54 (2017): 34063–34070.
10.1039/C7RA03574H
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
27E. Capuana, F. Lopresti, M. Ceraulo, and V. La Carrubba, “Poly-l-Lactic Acid (PLLA)-Based Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine: A Review on Processing and Applications,” Polymers 14, no. 6 (2022): 1153.
10.3390/polym14061153
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
28Y. Jiao, Z. Liu, and C. Zhou, “Fabrication and Characterization of PLLA-Chitosan Hybrid Scaffolds With Improved Cell Compatibility,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A 80, no. 4 (2007): 820–825.
10.1002/jbm.a.31061
PubMed Google Scholar
29B. S. Sack, J. R. Mauney, and C. R. Estrada, “Silk Fibroin Scaffolds for Urologic Tissue Engineering,” Current Urology Reports 17, no. 2 (2016): 16.
10.1007/s11934-015-0567-x
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
30L. B. Shi, H. X. Cai, L. K. Chen, et al., “Tissue Engineered Bulking Agent With Adipose-Derived Stem Cells and Silk Fibroin Microspheres for the Treatment of Intrinsic Urethral Sphincter Deficiency,” Biomaterials 35, no. 5 (2014): 1519–1530.
10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.025
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
31M. N. Collins and C. Birkinshaw, “Hyaluronic Acid Based Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering—A Review,” Carbohydrate Polymers 92, no. 2 (2013): 1262–1279.
10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.028
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
32C. Chircov, A. M. Grumezescu, and L. E. Bejenaru, “Hyaluronic Acid-Based Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering,” Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie 59, no. 1 (2018): 71–76.
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
33S. Zhang, L. Yang, S. Hong, et al., “Collagen Type Ⅰ–Loaded Methacrylamide Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel Microneedles Alleviate Stress Urinary Incontinence in Mice: A Novel Treatment and Prevention Strategy,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 222 (2023): 113085.
10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.113085
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
34M. J. Webber, O. F. Khan, S. A. Sydlik, B. C. Tang, and R. Langer, “A Perspective on the Clinical Translation of Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering 43, no. 3 (2015): 641–656.
10.1007/s10439-014-1104-7
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
35S. F. Badylak and T. W. Gilbert, “Immune Response to Biologic Scaffold Materials,” Seminars in Immunology 20, no. 2 (2008): 109–116.
10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.003
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
36R. Stanek, P. Kądziołka, A. M. Stanek, K. Szymanowski, and M. Wilczak, “The Use of Synthetic Materials in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence,” Menopausal Review 2, no. 2 (2016): 76–80.
10.5114/pm.2016.61188
Google Scholar

Volume44, Issue6

August 2025

Pages 1351-1360

Candidate Scaffolds for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Narrative Review

ABSTRACT

Aims

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Conflicts of Interest

Open Research

Data Availability Statement

References

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Candidate Scaffolds for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Narrative Review

ABSTRACT

Aims

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Conflicts of Interest

Open Research

Data Availability Statement

References

References

Related

Information