Volume 44, Issue 6 pp. 1271-1289
REVIEW

Urologic Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A Scoping Review of Syndrome-Specific Instruments

Arya Catna

Arya Catna

Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Victoria L. Brown

Victoria L. Brown

Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Claire Gwak

Claire Gwak

Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Deeksha Kanagarag

Deeksha Kanagarag

Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Madeline Meyer

Madeline Meyer

Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Srinitya Rapolu

Srinitya Rapolu

Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ratna Pakpahan

Ratna Pakpahan

Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Lauren Yaeger

Lauren Yaeger

Washington University School of Medicine, Bernard Becker Medical Library, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
James W. Griffith

James W. Griffith

Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Aimee S. James

Aimee S. James

Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
H. Henry Lai

H. Henry Lai

Department of Surgery; and the Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Urological Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jerry L. Lowder

Jerry L. Lowder

Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Siobhan Sutcliffe

Corresponding Author

Siobhan Sutcliffe

Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Correspondence: Siobhan Sutcliffe ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 June 2025

Claire Gwak, Deeksha Kanagarag, Madeline Meyer, and Srinitya Rapolu contributed equally to this study.

ABSTRACT

Objective

To facilitate research on interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) and chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) symptom variability or flares, we reviewed the published literature to document existing data collection instruments (e.g., questionnaires and diaries), and to identify those relevant for flare research.

Methods

Seven databases were searched systematically for articles describing the development of instruments: (1) specific for IC/BPS, CP/CPPS, or both; and (2) intended for use by investigators beyond the development team. In total, 1216 abstracts and 79 full-text articles were reviewed, and data were extracted in duplicate.

Results

We identified 17 instruments, 11 for IC/BPS, 5 for CP/CPPS, and 1 for both. In total, 13 instruments (12 questionnaires and 1 electronic diary) assessed symptoms for diagnostic, symptom evaluation, and/or symptom monitoring purposes, and included items assessing the presence, location, intensity (mostly typical intensity), and/or amount of time experienced pelvic pain and/or urinary symptoms. No instruments included items related to symptom variability or flares.

Conclusion

In addition to describing existing instruments for future urologic CPPS research, our review identified a lack of validated instruments for flares. Future studies should address this gap to facilitate rigorous research on this understudied topic.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data Availability Statement

All extracted data are presented in Tables 1–4.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.