Female urinary incontinence (UI) can lead to social isolation (SI). To reduce UI's probable impact, women tend to self-manage their symptoms and employ coping strategies which can sometimes be dysfunctional and exacerbate SI. UI dysfunctional coping strategies are primarily employed as a means of self-management, with women failing to engage in efforts to seek treatment. Literature regarding the mediating role of dysfunctional UI strategies in the relationship between UI severity and SI is scarce. Therefore, this study investigated the mediating role of dysfunctional UI hiding and defensive coping strategies in explaining the relationship between UI severity and SI, among middle-aged women experiencing stress, urgency, and mixed UI.

Study Design

The study adopted a cross-sectional, observational, descriptive, and correlational design, and recruited 1090 women online (social media) aged 40–65 years, who reported occasional or frequent urine loss and were not receiving any treatment for UI.

Main Outcome Measures

The predictor was symptom severity; the mediator outcome was dysfunctional UI strategies, and the main outcome measure was SI.

Results

Mediation analysis with structural equation modeling indicated that dysfunctional coping strategies significantly mediated the relationship between UI severity and SI, explaining a variability of 0.45 in SI. The direct effect between UI severity and SI was nonsignificant when indirect paths were included. Multigroup analysis indicated that the mediation model was consistent across different UI types, showing that the influence of dysfunctional strategies on SI was similar, regardless of the UI type.

Conclusions

UI severity influences social isolation through coping behaviors focused on defensive and hiding behaviors in women who have not sought treatment for UI and across the different UI types, highlighting the importance of addressing these strategies in healthcare interventions. Tailoring interventions to modify maladaptive coping strategies is crucial for reducing SI, and enhancing the quality of life of women experiencing UI.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Open Research

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this study's findings are available from the corresponding author (M.P.) upon reasonable request, without undue reservation.

Supporting Information

References

1P. Abrams, A. P. Smith, and N. Cotterill, “The Impact of Urinary Incontinence on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQol) in a Real-World Population of Women Aged 45-60 Years: Results From a Survey in France, Germany, the UK and the USA: Impact of UI on HRQol in a Real-World Population of Women Aged 45–60 Years,” BJU International 115, no. 1 (2015): 143–152, https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12852.
10.1111/bju.12852
PubMed Google Scholar
2I. Milsom and M. Gyhagen, “The Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence,” Climacteric 22, no. 3 (2019): 217–222, https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2018.1543263.
10.1080/13697137.2018.1543263
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
3F. G. Ugurlucan, I. Evruke, C. Yasa, O. Dural, and O. Yalcin, “Sexual Functions and Quality of Life of Women Over 50 Years With Urinary Incontinence, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and/or Pelvic Organ Prolapse,” International Journal of Impotence Research 32, no. 5 (2020): 535–543, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-019-0219-7.
10.1038/s41443-019-0219-7
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
4D. Biordi and N. Nicholson, “ Social Isolation.” in Chronic Illness: Impact and Intervention, eds. I. Lubkin and P. Larsen (Jones and Bartlett Publishers Learning, 2013), 85–116.
Google Scholar
5C. Tannenbaum, E. van den Heuvel, X. Fritel, et al., “Continence Across Continents to Upend Stigma and Dependency (CACTUS-D): Study Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial,” Trials 16 (2015): 565, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1099-x.
10.1186/s13063-015-1099-x
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
6J. A. Ricci, J. S. Baggish, T. L. Hunt, et al., “Coping Strategies and Health Care–Seeking Behavior in a US National Sample of Adults With Symptoms Suggestive of Overactive Bladder,” Clinical Therapeutics 23, no. 8 (2001): 1245–1259.
10.1016/S0149-2918(01)80104-1
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
7L. E. Waetjen, G. Xing, W. O. Johnson, J. Melnikow, and E. B. Gold, “Factors Associated With Reasons Incontinent Midlife Women Report for Not Seeking Urinary Incontinence Treatment Over 9 Years Across the Menopausal Transition,” Menopause 25, no. 1 (2018): 29–37, https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000000943.
10.1097/GME.0000000000000943
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
8A. C. Diokno, K. Burgio, N. H. Fultz, K. S. Kinchen, R. Obenchain, and R. C. Bump, “Medical and Self-Care Practices Reported by Women With Urinary Incontinence,” American Journal of Managed Care 10, no. 2 Pt. 1 (2004): 69–78.
PubMed Google Scholar
9D. Hayder and W. Schnepp, “Experiencing and Managing Urinary Incontinence: A Qualitative Study,” Western Journal of Nursing Research 32, no. 4 (2010): 480–496, https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945909354903.
10.1177/0193945909354903
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
10W. St John, S. Griffiths, M. Wallis, and S. McKenzie, “Women's Management of Urinary Incontinence in Daily Living,” Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing 40, no. 5 (2013): 524–532, https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e3182a2198a.
10.1097/WON.0b013e3182a2198a
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
11K. Peek, R. Sanson-Fisher, L. Mackenzie, and M. Carey, “Interventions to Aid Patient Adherence to Physiotherapist Prescribed Self-Management Strategies: A Systematic Review,” Physiotherapy 102, no. 2 (2016): 127–135, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2015.10.003.
10.1016/j.physio.2015.10.003
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
12M. Z. Pintos-Díaz, C. Alonso-Blanco, P. Parás-Bravo, et al., “Living With Urinary Incontinence: Potential Risks of Women's Health? A Qualitative Study on the Perspectives of Female Patients Seeking Care for the First Time in a Specialized Center,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 19 (2019): 3781, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193781.
10.3390/ijerph16193781
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
13D. Bilgic, N. Kizilkaya Beji, A. Ozbas, I. Cavdar, E. Aslan, and O. Yalcin, “Coping and Help-Seeking Behaviors for Management of Urinary Incontinence,” LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms 9, no. 3 (2017): 134–141, https://doi.org/10.1111/luts.12120.
10.1111/luts.12120
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
14D. Xu, N. Liu, H. Qu, L. Chen, and K. Wang, “Relationships Among Symptom Severity, Coping Styles, and Quality of Life in Community-Dwelling Women With Urinary Incontinence: A Multiple Mediator Model,” Quality of Life Research 25, no. 1 (2016): 223–232, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1070-z.
10.1007/s11136-015-1070-z
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
15K. Anders, “Coping Strategies for Women With Urinary Incontinence,” Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 14, no. 2 (2000): 355–361, https://doi.org/10.1053/beog.1999.0078.
10.1053/beog.1999.0078
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
16J. F. Hair Jr, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.) (Prentice Hall, 2009).
Google Scholar
17C. S. Bradley, D. D. Rahn, I. E. Nygaard, et al., “The Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID): Validity and Responsiveness to Change in Women Undergoing Non-Surgical Therapies for Treatment of Stress Predominant Urinary Incontinence,” Neurourology and Urodynamics 29, no. 5 (2010): 727–734, https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20818.
10.1002/nau.20818
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
18M. R. Soules, S. Sherman, E. Parrott, et al., “Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop (STRAW),” Journal of Women's Health & Gender-Based Medicine 10, no. 9 (2001): 843–848, https://doi.org/10.1089/152460901753285732.
10.1089/152460901753285732
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
19M. Porto, J. Marôco, T. Mascarenhas, and F. Pimenta, “Corrigendum: Beliefs and Strategies About Urinary Incontinence: A Possible Moderation Role Between Symptoms and Sexual Function, and Quality of Life,” Frontiers in Psychology 15 (2024): 1359674, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1359674.
10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1359674
PubMed Google Scholar
20C. J. Kelleher, A. M. Pleil, P. R. Reese, S. M. Burgess, and P. H. Brodish, “How Much Is Enough and Who Says So?,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 111, no. 6 (2004): 605–612, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00129.x.
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00129.x
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
21C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, “Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research 18, no. 1 (1981): 39–50, https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.
10.1177/002224378101800104
Web of Science® Google Scholar
22J. Marôco, “Análise de Equações Estruturais: fundamentos teóricos Aplicações [Analysis of Structural Equations: Theoretical Foundations, Software & Applications].” 3rd ed. Report Number Lda; (2021), Software E.
Google Scholar
23S. J. Finney, C. DiStefano, and P. Kopp, “ Overview of Estimation Methods and Preconditions for Their Application With Structural Equation Modeling,” in Principles and Methods of Test Construction: Standards and Recent Advances, eds. K. Schweizer and C. DiStefano. (Hogrefe, 2016), 135–165.
Google Scholar
24B. M. Byrne, Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS (Psychology Press, 2001).
Google Scholar
25L. Rutkowski and D. Svetina, “Assessing the Hypothesis of Measurement Invariance in the Context of Large-Scale International Surveys,” Educational and Psychological Measurement 74, no. 1 (2014): 31–57, https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413498257.
10.1177/0013164413498257
Web of Science® Google Scholar

Volume44, Issue6

August 2025

Pages 1361-1369

Dysfunctional Urinary Incontinence Strategies: A Mediation Model to Explain Why Urinary Incontinence Symptoms Are Associated With Social Isolation Among Women

ABSTRACT

Objective

Study Design

Main Outcome Measures

Results

Conclusions

Conflicts of Interest

Open Research

Data Availability Statement

Supporting Information

References

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Dysfunctional Urinary Incontinence Strategies: A Mediation Model to Explain Why Urinary Incontinence Symptoms Are Associated With Social Isolation Among Women

ABSTRACT

Objective

Study Design

Main Outcome Measures

Results

Conclusions

Conflicts of Interest

Open Research

Data Availability Statement

Supporting Information

References

References

Related

Information