Volume 38, Issue 2 pp. 599-606
ORIGINAL BASIC SCIENCE ARTICLE

The vaginal distention model in mice is not a reliable model of simulated birth trauma-induced stress urinary incontinence

Ramzi El Hassan MD

Ramzi El Hassan MD

Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York

Search for more papers by this author
Alex Galante MD

Alex Galante MD

Department of Urology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Kavran

Michael Kavran

Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen Ganocy

Stephen Ganocy

Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University,, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
Ahmad O. Khalifa MD

Ahmad O. Khalifa MD

Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

Department of Urology, Menoufia University, Shebin Al Kom, Egypt

Search for more papers by this author
Adonis Hijaz MD

Corresponding Author

Adonis Hijaz MD

Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

Correspondence

Adonis Hijaz, Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center Case Western Reserve University 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 December 2018
Citations: 2

Abstract

Aims

Vaginal distention (VD) is a validated model of birth-related trauma in rats. Recently a mouse VD model was reported. Our study was originally conducted to evaluate the impact of age on VD in mice. This manuscript describes the study and reports on the lack of reproducibility of VD models in mice.

Methods

We utilized female C57BL/6 mice. A total of 190, 12-weeks old mice, were randomized into VD and sham groups. We inflated a modified Foley's balloon with 0.3 mL for 1 h inside the mice vagina. Afterwards, we measured the leak point pressure (LPP) at defined timepoints (0, 4, 10, 20, or 40 days). We randomized another 190, 40-week old, C57BL/6 mice into either VD or sham groups. We used an extra 20 mice as age − matched controls.

Results

In both 12 and 40 weeks-old mice, LPP was significantly decreased versus the negative controls at day 0. Additionally, in both 12 and 40 weeks-old mice, the decrease in LPP was significantly higher in the VD group compared to the sham group at day 0. However, the LPP results were comparable between VD and sham at any other time point thereafter. Furthermore, there was no significant change in LPP values between instrumented (VD and sham) mice and control mice at any time after day 0.

Conclusions

The VD models previously described is not a reproducible model for the study of VD with large number of mice. Our results, unfortunately, do not support its use to study VD injury in mice.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.