Volume 55, Issue 1 pp. 3-4
AANEM Position Statement

Proper performance of autonomic function testing

Policy Department, American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Corresponding Author

Policy Department, American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Correspondence to: American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine, 2621 Superior Drive NW, Rochester, MN 55901; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 27 October 2016
Citations: 4

This article was developed by members of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) with oversight by the AANEM Professional Practice Committee: Christopher H. Gibbons, MD (lead author); Jasvinder P. Chawla, MD, MBA; William P. Cheshire, MD; Bilal Saulat, MD; Benn E. Smith, MD; and Louis H. Weimer, MD. It was approved by the AANEM Board of Directors on August 22, 2016. It did not undergo further peer review by Muscle & Nerve.

ABSTRACT

Introduction

The aim of this position statement is to provide a recommendation from experts at the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) on the proper performance of autonomic testing.

Methods

The AANEM Professional Practice Committee and selected AANEM members reached a consensus based on expert opinion on the training required to perform autonomic testing and the appropriate performance of such tests.

Results

Individuals without sufficient medical education in autonomic disorders are unqualified to interpret the data generated or to coordinate the findings with other clinical information in order to reach a clinical diagnosis.

Conclusions

The AANEM strongly recommends that autonomic testing procedures be performed by physicians with comprehensive knowledge of neurologic and autonomic disorders to ensure precise interpretation and diagnosis at the completion of the testing. The same physician should obtain a relevant history and physical examination and should directly supervise and interpret the data on-site and in real time. Muscle Nerve 55: 3–4, 2017

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me