AANEM Monograph
Electrodiagnostic evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome†
Robert A. Werner MD, MS,
Michael Andary MD, MS,
Corresponding Author
Robert A. Werner MD, MS
University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor Veterans Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
AANEM, 2621 Superior Drive NW, Rochester, MN 55901Search for more papers by this authorMichael Andary MD, MS
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
Search for more papers by this authorRobert A. Werner MD, MS,
Michael Andary MD, MS,
Corresponding Author
Robert A. Werner MD, MS
University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor Veterans Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
AANEM, 2621 Superior Drive NW, Rochester, MN 55901Search for more papers by this authorMichael Andary MD, MS
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
Search for more papers by this author†
This paper was reviewed and edited by committees of the AANEM. It did not undergo further review at Muscle & Nerve.
Abstract
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common nerve entrapment. Electrodiagnostic (EDX) studies are a valid and reliable means of confirming the diagnosis. This monograph addresses the various EDX techniques used to evaluate the median nerve at the wrist. It also demonstrates the limitations of EDX studies with a focus on the sensitivity and specificity of EDX testing for CTS. The need to use reference values for populations such as diabetics and active workers, where normative values differ from conventional cutoffs used to confirm suspected CTS, is presented. The value of needle electromyography (EMG) is examined. Muscle Nerve, 2011
REFERENCES
- 1 Schappert SM, Rechtsteiner EA. Ambulatory medical care utilization estimates for 2006. Natl Health Stat Report 2008; 6: 1–29.
- 2 Cullen KA, Hall MJ, Golosinskiy A. Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. Natl Health Stat Report 2009; 28: 1–25.
- 3 Jablecki CK, Andary MT, So YT, Wilkins DE, Williams FH. Literature review of the usefulness of nerve conduction studies and electromyography for the evaluation of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1993; 16: 1392–1414.
- 4 Sunderland S. Nerves and nerve injuries. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1978. p 15.
- 5 Gilliatt RW, Sears TA. Sensory nerve action potentials in patients with peripheral nerve lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1958; 21: 109–118.
- 6
Salerno DF,
Werner RA,
Albers JW,
Becker MP,
Armstrong TJ,
Franzblau A.
Reliability of nerve conduction studies among active workers.
Muscle Nerve
1999;
22:
1372–1379.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199910)22:10<1372::AID-MUS6>3.0.CO;2-S CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 7
Dorfman LJ,
Robinson LR.
AAEM minimonograph #47: Normative data in electrodiagnostic medicine.
Muscle Nerve
1997;
20:
4–14.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199701)20:1<4::AID-MUS1>3.0.CO;2-H CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 8
Robinson LR,
Micklesen PJ,
Wang L.
Strategies for analyzing nerve conduction data: superiority of a summary index over single tests.
Muscle Nerve
1998;
21:
1166–1171.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199809)21:9<1166::AID-MUS7>3.0.CO;2-5 CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 9 Robinson LR, Micklesen PJ, Wang L. Optimizing the number of tests for carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 2000; 23: 1880–1882.
- 10 American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome: summary statement. Muscle Nerve 2002; 25: 918–922.
- 11 Keith MW, Masear V, Chung KC, Amadio PC, Andary M, Barth RW, et al. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92: 218–219.
- 12 Goddard DH, Barnes CG, Berry H, Evans S. Measurement of nerve conduction—a comparison of orthodromic and antidromic methods. Clin Rheumatol 1983; 2: 169–174.
- 13 Melvin JL, Harris DH, Johnson EW. Sensory and motor conduction velocities in the ulnar and median nerves. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1966; 47: 511–519.
- 14
Salerno DF,
Franzblau A,
Werner RA,
Bromberg MB,
Armstrong TJ,
Albers JW.
Median and ulnar nerve conduction studies among workers: normative values.
Muscle Nerve
1998;
21:
999–1005.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199808)21:8<999::AID-MUS3>3.0.CO;2-0 CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 15 Jablecki C, Nazemi R. Unsuspected digital nerve lesions responsible for abnormal median sensory responses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982; 63: 135–138.
- 16 Buchthal F, Rosenfalck A, Trojaborg W. Electrophysiological findings in entrapment of the median nerve at wrist and elbow. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1974; 37: 340–360.
- 17 Stevens JC. AAEE minimonograph #26: The electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1987; 10: 99–113.
- 18
Stevens JC.
AAEM minimonograph #26: The electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.
Muscle Nerve
1997;
20:
1477–1486.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199712)20:12<1477::AID-MUS1>3.0.CO;2-5 CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 19 Felsenthal G, Spindler H. Palmar conduction time of median and ulnar nerves of normal subjects and patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Phys Med 1979; 58: 131–138.
- 20 Kimura J. Electrodiagnosis in diseases of nerve and muscle: principles and practices. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis; 1983. p 106–111.
- 21 Gordon C, Bowyer BL, Johnson EW. Electrodiagnostic characteristics of acute carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 68: 545–548.
- 22 Ross MA, Kimura J. AAEM case report #2: The carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1995; 18: 567–573.
- 23 Daube JR, Stevens JC. The electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (a reply). Muscle Nerve 1993; 16: 798.
- 24 Carroll GJ. Comparison of median and radial nerve sensory latencies in the electrophysiological diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987; 68: 101–106.
- 25 Pease WS, Cannell CD, Johnson EW. Median to radial latency difference test in mild carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1989; 12: 905–909.
- 26 Nathan PA, Keniston RC, Meadows KD, Lockwood RS. Predictive value of nerve conduction measurements at the carpal tunnel. Muscle Nerve 1993; 16: 1377–1382.
- 27 Nathan PA, Meadows KD, Doyle LS. Sensory segmental latency values of the median nerve for a population of normal individuals. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 499–501.
- 28 Malladi N, Micklesen PJ, Hou J, Robinson LR. Correlation between the combined sensory index and clinical outcome after carpal tunnel decompression: a retrospective review. Muscle Nerve 2010; 41: 453–457.
- 29 Rivner MH. Statistical errors and their effect on electrodiagnostic medicine. Muscle Nerve 1994; 17: 811–814.
- 30
Sander HW,
Quinto C,
Saadeh PB,
Chokroverty S.
Sensitive median–ulnar motor comparative techniques in carpal tunnel syndrome.
Muscle Nerve
1999;
22:
88–98.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199901)22:1<88::AID-MUS13>3.0.CO;2-C CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 31 Felsenthal G. Median and ulnar distal motor and sensory latencies in the same normal subject. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1977; 58: 297–302.
- 32 Williams FH, Andary MT. Carpal tunnel syndrome: techniques for diagnosis. Rochester, MN: American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine; 2001. p 1–8.
- 33 Preston DC, Logigian EL. Lumbrical and interossei recording in carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1992; 15: 1253–1257.
- 34 Preston DC, Ross MH, Kothari MJ, Plotkin GM, Venkatesh S, Logigian EL. The median–ulnar latency difference studies are comparable in mild carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1994; 17: 1469–1471.
- 35 Preston DC, Logigian EL. Lumbrical and interossei recording in carpal tunnel syndrome (a reply). Muscle Nerve 1994; 17: 360.
- 36
Trojaborg W,
Grewal RP,
Weimer LH,
Sheriff P.
Value of latency measurements to the small palm muscles compared to other conduction parameters in the carpal tunnel syndrome.
Muscle Nerve
1996;
19:
243–245.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199602)19:2<243::AID-MUS22>3.0.CO;2-U CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 37 Logigian EL, Busis NA, Berger AR, Brunyninckx F, Khalil N, Shahani BT, et al. Lumbrical sparing in carpal tunnel syndrome: anatomic, physiologic, and diagnostic implications. Neurology 1987; 37: 1499–1505.
- 38 Lesser EA, Venkatesh S, Preston DC, Logigian EL. Stimulation distal to the lesion in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1995; 18: 503–507.
- 39 Dumitru D. Electrodiagnostic medicine. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; 1995. p 143, 872, 874–875.
- 40 Marin EL, Vernick S, Friedmann LW. Carpal tunnel syndrome: median nerve stress test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 206–208.
- 41 Schwartz MS, Gordon JA, Swash M. Slowed nerve conduction with wrist flexion in carpal tunnel syndrome. Ann Neurol 1980; 8: 69–71.
- 42 Dunnan JB, Waylonis GW. Wrist flexion as an adjunct to the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991; 72: 211–213.
- 43 Keith MW, Masear V, Chung K, Maupin K, Andary M, Amadio PC, et al. Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009; 17: 389–396.
- 44 Rempel D, Evanoff B, Amadio PC, de Krom M, Franklin G, Franzblau A, et al. Consensus criteria for classification of carpal tunnel syndrome in epidemiologic studies. Am J Publ Health 1998; 88: 1447–1451.
- 45 Gelberman RH, Hergenroeder PT, Hargens AR, Lundborg GN, Akeson WH. The carpal tunnel syndrome. A study of carpal canal pressures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981; 63: 380–383.
- 46 Homan MM, Franzblau A, Werner RA, Albers JW, Armstrong TJ, Bromberg MB. Agreement between symptom surveys, physical examination procedures and electrodiagnostic findings for carpal tunnel syndrome. Scand J Work Environ Health 1999; 25: 115–124.
- 47 Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosen I. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA 1999; 282: 153–158.
- 48
Bingham RC,
Rosecrance JC,
Cook TM.
Prevalence of abnormal nerve conduction in applicants for industrial jobs.
Am J Ind Med
1996;
30:
355–361.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199609)30:3<355::AID-AJIM15>3.0.CO;2-V CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 49 Werner RA, Franzblau A, Albers JW, Buchele H, Armstrong TJ. Use of screening nerve conduction studies for predicting future carpal tunnel syndrome. Occup Environ Med 1997; 54: 96–100.
- 50 Werner RA, Gell N, Franzblau A, Armstrong TJ. Prolonged median sensory latency as a predictor of future carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 2001; 24: 1462–1467.
- 51
Nathan PA,
Keniston RC,
Myers LD,
Meadows KD,
Lockwood RS.
Natural history of median nerve sensory conduction in industry: relationship to symptoms and carpal tunnel syndrome in 558 hands over 11 years.
Muscle Nerve
1998;
21:
711–721.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199806)21:6<711::AID-MUS2>3.0.CO;2-A CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 52
Albers JW,
Brown MB,
Sima AA,
Greene DA.
Frequency of median mononeuropathy in patients with mild diabetic neuropathy in the early diabetes intervention trial (EDIT). Tolrestat Study Group For Edit (Early Diabetes Intervention Trial).
Muscle Nerve
1996;
19:
140–146.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199602)19:2<140::AID-MUS3>3.0.CO;2-E CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 53 Eversmann WW Jr, Ritsick JA. Intraoperative changes in motor nerve conduction latency in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg [Am] 1978; 3: 77–81.
- 54 Garland H, Langworth EP, Tavener D, Clark JM. Surgical treatment for the carpal tunnel syndrome. Lancet 1964; 1: 1129–1130.
- 55 Hongell A, Mattsson HS. Neurographic studies before, after, and during operation for median nerve compression in the carpal tunnel. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1971; 5: 103–109.
- 56 El-Hajj T, Tohme R, Sawaya R. Changes in electrophysiological parameters after surgery for the carpal tunnel syndrome. J Clin Neurophysiol 2010; 27: 224–226.
- 57 Prick JJ, Blaauw G, Vredeveld JW, Oosterloo SJ. Results of carpal tunnel release. Eur J Neurol 2003; 10: 733–736.
- 58 Yates SK, Hurst LN, Brown WF. Physiological observations in the median nerve during carpal tunnel surgery. Ann Neurol 1981; 10: 227–229.
- 59 Balbierz JM, Cottrell AC, Cottrell WD. Is needle examination always necessary in evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 514–516.
- 60 Werner RA, Albers JW. Relation between needle electromyography and nerve conduction studies in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 246–249.
- 61 Chan L, Turner JA, Comstock BA, Levenson LM, Hollingworth W, Heagerty PJ, et al. The relationship between electrodiagnostic findings and patient symptoms and function in carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 19–24.
- 62 Katz JN, Larson MG, Sabra A, Krarup C, Stirrat CR, Sethi R, et al. The carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic utility of the history and physical examination. Ann Intern Med 1990; 112: 321–27.
- 63 Bland JD. Do nerve conduction studies predict the outcome of carpal tunnel decompression? Muscle Nerve 2001; 24: 935–940.
- 64 Robinson L, Kliot M. Stop using arbitrary grading schemes in carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 2008; 37: 804.
- 65 Cannon LJ, Bernacki EJ, Walter SD. Personal and occupational factors associated with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Occup Med 1982; 23: 255–258.
- 66 Nathan PA, Keniston RC, Myers LD, Meadows KD. Obesity as a risk factor for slowing of sensory conduction of the median nerve in industry: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study involving 429 workers. J Occup Med 1992; 34: 379–383.
- 67 Werner RA, Franzblau A, Albers JW, Armstrong TJ. Influence of body mass index and work activity on the prevalence of median mononeuropathy at the wrist. Occup Environ Med 1997; 54: 268–271.
- 68 Kimura J. The carpal tunnel syndrome: localization of conduction abnormalities within the distal segment of the median nerve. Brain 1979; 102: 619–635.
- 69 Andary MT, Fankhauser MJ, Spiegel N, Zaneteas P, Ritson JL, Hulce VD, et al. Comparison of four techniques in the diagnosis of mild carpal tunnel syndrome [abstract]. Muscle Nerve 1992; 15: 1174.
- 70 Johnson EW, Kukla RD, Wongsam PE, Piedmont A. Sensory latencies to the ring finger: normal values and relation to carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1981; 62: 206–208.
- 71 Jackson DA, Clifford JC. Electrodiagnosis of mild carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989; 70: 199–204.
- 72 Uncini A, Lange DJ, Soloman M, Soliven B, Meer J, Lovelace RE. Ring finger testing in carpal tunnel syndrome: a comparative study of diagnostic utility. Muscle Nerve 1989; 12: 735–741.
- 73 Redmond MD, Rivner MH. False positive electrodiagnostic tests in carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1988; 11: 511–518.
- 74 Johnson EW, Sipski M, Lammertse T. Median and radial sensory latencies to digit I: normal values and usefulness in carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 68: 140–141.
Citing Literature
