The shear modulus of the nucleus pulposus measured using magnetic resonance elastography: A potential biomarker for intervertebral disc degeneration
Daniel H. Cortes
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJeremy F. Magland
Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAlexander C. Wright
Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Dawn M. Elliott
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA
Correspondence to: Dawn M. Elliott, Ph.D., Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, 125 E Delaware Ave., Newark, DE 19716. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorDaniel H. Cortes
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJeremy F. Magland
Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAlexander C. Wright
Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Dawn M. Elliott
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA
Correspondence to: Dawn M. Elliott, Ph.D., Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, 125 E Delaware Ave., Newark, DE 19716. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Purpose
This study aims to: (1) measure the shear modulus of nucleus pulposus (NP) in intact human vertebra–disc–vertebra segments using a magnetic resonance elastography setup for a 7T whole-body scanner, (2) quantify the effect of disc degeneration on the NP shear modulus measured using magnetic resonance elastography, and (3) compare the NP shear modulus to other magnetic resonance-based biomarkers of dis degeneration.
Methods
Thirty intact human disc segments were classified as normal, mild, or severely degenerated. The NP shear modulus was measured using a custom-made setup that included a novel inverse method less sensitive to noisy displacements. T2 relaxation time was measured at 7T. The accuracy of these parameters to classify different degrees of degeneration was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves.
Results
The magnetic resonance elastography measure of shear modulus in the NP was able to differentiate between normal, mild degeneration, and severe degeneration. The T2 relaxation time was able to differentiate between normal and mild degeneration, but it could not distinguish between mild and severe degeneration.
Conclusions
This study shows that the NP shear modulus measured using magnetic resonance elastography is sensitive to disc degeneration and has the potential of being used as a clinical tool to quantify the mechanical integrity of the intervertebral disc. Magn Reson Med 72:211–219, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
REFERENCES
- 1Chan WCW, Sze KL, Samartzis D, Leung VYL, Chan D. Structure and biology of the intervertebral disc in health and disease. Orthop Clin North Am 2011; 42: 447–464, vii.
- 2Adams MA, Dolan P. Intervertebral disc degeneration: evidence for two distinct phenotypes. J Anat 2012; 221: 497–506.
- 3Lyons G, Eisenstein SM, Sweet MB. Biochemical changes in intervertebral disc degeneration. Biochim Biophys Acta 1981; 673: 443–453.
- 4Pearce RH, Grimmer BJ, Adams ME. Degeneration and the chemical composition of the human lumbar intervertebral disc. J Orthop Res 1987; 5: 198–205.
- 5Olczyk K. Age-related changes in proteoglycans of human intervertebral discs. Z Rheumatol 1994; 53: 19–25.
- 6Bae WC, Masuda K. Emerging technologies for molecular therapy for intervertebral disc degeneration. Orthop Clin North Am 2011; 42: 585–601, ix.
- 7Kepler CK, Anderson DG, Tannoury C, Ponnappan RK. Intervertebral disk degeneration and emerging biologic treatments. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011; 19: 543–553.
- 8Zhao C-Q, Wang L-M, Jiang L-S, Dai L-Y. The cell biology of intervertebral disc aging and degeneration. Ageing Res. Rev. 2007; 6: 247–261.
- 9Smith LJ, Nerurkar NL, Choi K-S, Harfe BD, Elliott DM. Degeneration and regeneration of the intervertebral disc: lessons from development. Dis Model Mech 2011; 4: 31–41.
- 10Pfirrmann CWA, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. SPINE 2001; 26: 1873–1878.
- 11Christe A, Läubli R, Guzman R, Berlemann U, Moore RJ, Schroth G, Vock P, Lövblad KO. Degeneration of the cervical disc: histology compared with radiography and magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroradiology 2005; 47: 721–729.
- 12Borthakur A, Maurer PM, Fenty M, Wang C, Berger R, Yoder J, Balderston RA, Elliott DM. T1ρ magnetic resonance imaging and discography pressure as novel biomarkers for disc degeneration and low back pain. Spine 2011; 36: 2190–2196.
- 13Johannessen W, Auerbach JD, Wheaton AJ, Kurji A, Borthakur A, Reddy R, Elliott DM. Assessment of human disc degeneration and proteoglycan content using T1rho-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 2006; 31: 1253–1257.
- 14Majumdar S, Link TM, Steinbach LS, Hu S, Kurhanewicz J. Diagnostic tools and imaging methods in intervertebral disk degeneration. Orthop Clin North Am 2011; 42: 501–511, viii.
- 15Mwale F, Demers CN, Michalek AJ, Beaudoin G, Goswami T, Beckman L, Iatridis JC, Antoniou J. Evaluation of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging, biochemical and mechanical properties of trypsin-treated intervertebral discs under physiological compression loading. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27: 563–573.
- 16Mwale F, Iatridis JC, Antoniou J. Quantitative MRI as a diagnostic tool of intervertebral disc matrix composition and integrity. Eur Spine J 2008; 17: 432–440.
- 17Périé D, Iatridis JC, Demers CN, Goswami T, Beaudoin G, Mwale F, Antoniou J. Assessment of compressive modulus, hydraulic permeability and matrix content of trypsin-treated nucleus pulposus using quantitative MRI. J Biomech 2006; 39: 1392–1400.
- 18Moon CH, Jacobs L, Kim J-H, Sowa G, Vo N, Kang J, Bae KT. Part 2: quantitative proton T2 and sodium magnetic resonance imaging to assess intervertebral disc degeneration in a rabbit model. Spine 2012; 37: E1113–E1119.
- 19Wang C, Witschey W, Goldberg A, Elliott M, Borthakur A, Reddy R. Magnetization transfer ratio mapping of intervertebral disc degeneration. Magn Reson Med 2010; 64: 1520–1528.
- 20Iatridis JC, Setton LA, Weidenbaum M, Mow VC. Alterations in the mechanical behavior of the human lumbar nucleus pulposus with degeneration and aging. J Orthop Res 1997; 15: 318–322.
- 21Inoue N, Espinoza Orías AA. Biomechanics of intervertebral disk degeneration. Orthop Clin North Am 2011; 42: 487–499, vii.
- 22Johannessen W, Elliott DM. Effects of degeneration on the biphasic material properties of human nucleus pulposus in confined compression. Spine 2005; 30: E724–E729.
- 23Muthupillai R, Lomas DJ, Rossman PJ, Greenleaf JF, Manduca A, Ehman RL. Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. Science 1995; 269: 1854–1857.
- 24Garteiser P, Doblas S, Daire J-L, Wagner M, Leitao H, Vilgrain V, Sinkus R, Van Beers BE. MR elastography of liver tumours: value of viscoelastic properties for tumour characterisation. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 2169–2177.
- 25Huwart L, Peeters F, Sinkus R, Annet L, Salameh N, ter Beek LC, Horsmans Y, Van Beers BE. Liver fibrosis: non-invasive assessment with MR elastography. NMR Biomed 2006; 19: 173–179.
- 26Johnson CL, McGarry MDJ, Van Houten EEW, Weaver JB, Paulsen KD, Sutton BP, Georgiadis JG. Magnetic resonance elastography of the brain using multishot spiral readouts with self-navigated motion correction. Magn Reson Med 2012; 70: 404–412.
- 27Kamphues C, Klatt D, Bova R, Yahyazadeh A, Bahra M, Braun J, Klauschen F, Neuhaus P, Sack I, Asbach P. Viscoelasticity-based magnetic resonance elastography for the assessment of liver fibrosis in hepatitis C patients after liver transplantation. Rofo 2012; 184: 1013–1019.
- 28Kruse SA, Rose GH, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Felmlee JP, Jack CR, Ehman RL. Magnetic resonance elastography of the brain. Neuroimage 2008; 39: 231–237.
- 29Sack I, Beierbach B, Hamhaber U, Klatt D, Braun J. Non-invasive measurement of brain viscoelasticity using magnetic resonance elastography. NMR Biomed 2008; 21: 265–271.
- 30Sinkus R, Lorenzen J, Schrader D, Lorenzen M, Dargatz M, Holz D. High-resolution tensor MR elastography for breast tumour detection. Phys Med Biol 2000; 45: 1649–1664.
- 31Yin M, Talwalkar JA, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Grimm RC, Rossman PJ, Fidler JL, Ehman RL. Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 1207–1213.
- 32Othman SF, Xu HH, Royston TJ, Magin RL. Microscopic magnetic resonance elastography (mu MRE). Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 605–615.
- 33McGraw T, Kawai T, Yassine I, Zhu L. Visualizing high-order symmetric tensor field structure with differential operators. J Appl Math 2011. doi: 10.1155/2011/142923.
- 34Oliphant TE, Manduca A, Ehman RL, Greenleaf JF. Complex-valued stiffness reconstruction for magnetic resonance elastography by algebraic inversion of the differential equation. Magn Reson Med 2001; 45: 299–310.
- 35Papazoglou S, Hamhaber U, Braun J, Sack I. Algebraic Helmholtz inversion in planar magnetic resonance elastography. Phys Med Biol 2008; 53: 3147–3158.
- 36Perriñez PR, Pattison AJ, Kennedy FE, Weaver JB, Paulsen KD. Contrast detection in fluid-saturated media with magnetic resonance poroelastography. Med Phys 2010; 37: 3518–3526.
- 37Perriñez PR, Kennedy FE, Van Houten EEW, Weaver JB, Paulsen KD. Magnetic resonance poroelastography: an algorithm for estimating the mechanical properties of fluid-saturated soft tissues. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010; 29: 746–755.
- 38Righetti R, Ophir J, Kumar AT, Krouskop TA. Assessing image quality in effective Poisson's ratio elastography and poroelastography: II. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52: 1321–1333.
- 39Righetti R, Srinivasan S, Kumar AT, Ophir J, Krouskop TA. Assessing image quality in effective Poisson's ratio elastography and poroelastography: I. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52: 1303–1320.
- 40Clayton EH, Okamoto RJ, Bayly PV. Mechanical properties of viscoelastic media by local frequency estimation of divergence-free wave fields. J Biomech Eng 2013; 135: 021025.
- 41Okamoto RJ, Clayton EH, Bayly PV. Viscoelastic properties of soft gels: comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and dynamic shear testing in the shear wave regime. Phys Med Biol 2011; 56: 6379–6400.
- 42Jazini E, Sharan AD, Morse LJ, Dyke JP, Aronowitz EB, Chen LKH, Tang SY. Alterations in T2 relaxation magnetic resonance imaging of the ovine intervertebral disc due to nonenzymatic glycation. Spine 2012; 37: E209–E215.
- 43Hoogendoorn R, Doulabi BZ, Huang CL, Wuisman PI, Bank RA, Helder MN. Molecular changes in the degenerated goat intervertebral disc. Spine 2008; 33: 1714–1721.
- 44Tang S, Rebholz BJ. Does anterior lumbar interbody fusion promote adjacent degeneration in degenerative disc disease? A finite element study. J Orthop Sci 2011; 16: 221–228.
- 45Tan JS, Uppuganti S. Cumulative multiple freeze-thaw cycles and testing does not affect subsequent within-day variation in intervertebral flexibility of human cadaveric lumbosacral spine. Spine 2012; 37: E1238–E1242.
- 46Hongo M, Gay RE, Hsu J-T, Zhao KD, Ilharreborde B, Berglund LJ, An K-N. Effect of multiple freeze-thaw cycles on intervertebral dynamic motion characteristics in the porcine lumbar spine. J Biomech 2008; 41: 916–920.
- 47Dhillon N, Bass EC, Lotz JC. Effect of frozen storage on the creep behavior of human intervertebral discs. SPINE 2001; 26: 883–888.
- 48O'Connell GD, Vresilovic EJ, Elliott DM. Comparison of animals used in disc research to human lumbar disc geometry. Spine 2007; 32: 328–333.
- 49Nguyen AM, Levenston ME. Comparison of osmotic swelling influences on meniscal fibrocartilage and articular cartilage tissue mechanics in compression and shear. J Orthop Res 2012; 30: 95–102.
- 50Roos RW, Petterson R, Huyghe JM. Confined compression and torsion experiments on a pHEMA gel in various bath concentrations. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2013; 12: 617–626.
- 51Biot M. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid-saturated porous solid. 1. Low-frequency range. J Acoust Soc Am 1956; 28: 168–178.
- 52Biot M. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid-saturated porous solid. 2. Higher frequency range. J Acoust Soc Am 1956; 28: 179–191.
- 53Sharma MD. Wave propagation in a dissipative poroelastic medium. IMA J Appl Math 2013; 78: 59–69.
- 54Périé D, Korda D, Iatridis JC. Confined compression experiments on bovine nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus: sensitivity of the experiment in the determination of compressive modulus and hydraulic permeability. J Biomech 2005; 38: 2164–2171.