Use of a reference tissue and blood vessel to measure the arterial input function in DCEMRI
Xiaobing Fan
Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Search for more papers by this authorChad R. Haney
Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Search for more papers by this authorDevkumar Mustafi
Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCheng Yang
Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Search for more papers by this authorMarta Zamora
Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Search for more papers by this authorErica J. Markiewicz
Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Gregory S. Karczmar
Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Department of Radiology, MC2026, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL 60637===Search for more papers by this authorXiaobing Fan
Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Search for more papers by this authorChad R. Haney
Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Search for more papers by this authorDevkumar Mustafi
Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCheng Yang
Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Search for more papers by this authorMarta Zamora
Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Search for more papers by this authorErica J. Markiewicz
Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Gregory S. Karczmar
Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Department of Radiology, MC2026, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL 60637===Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Accurate measurement of the arterial input function is critical for quantitative evaluation of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging data. Use of the reference tissue method to derive a local arterial input function avoided large errors associated with direct arterial measurements, but relied on literature values for Ktrans and ve. We demonstrate that accurate values of Ktrans and ve in a reference tissue can be measured by comparing contrast media concentration in a reference tissue to plasma concentrations measured directly in a local artery after the 1–2 passes of the contrast media bolus—when plasma concentration is low and can be measured accurately. The values of Ktrans and ve calculated for the reference tissue can then be used to derive a more complete arterial input function including the first pass of the contrast bolus. This new approach was demonstrated using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging data from rodent hind limb. Values obtained for Ktrans and ve in muscle, and the shape and amplitude of the derived arterial input function are consistent with published results. Magn Reson Med, 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
REFERENCES
- 1 Radjenovic A, Dall BJ, Ridgway JP, Smith MA. Measurement of pharmacokinetic parameters in histologically graded invasive breast tumours using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Br J Radiol 2008; 81: 120–128.
- 2 Bonekamp D, Macura KJ. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the prostate. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 19: 273–284.
- 3 Armitage P, Behrenbruch C, Brady M, Moore N. Extracting and visualizing physiological parameters using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Med Image Anal 2005; 9: 315–329.
- 4 Port RE, Knopp MV, Brix G. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using Gd-DTPA: interindividual variability of the arterial input function and consequences for the assessment of kinetics in tumors. Magn Reson Med 2001; 45: 1030–1038.
- 5 McGrath DM, Bradley DP, Tessier JL, Lacey T, Taylor CJ, Parker GJ. Comparison of model-based arterial input functions for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in tumor bearing rats. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61: 1173–1184.
- 6 Tofts PS, Kermode AG. Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med 1991; 17: 357–367.
- 7 Kovar DA, Lewis M, Karczmar GS. A new method for imaging perfusion and contrast extraction fraction: input functions derived from reference tissues. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 1126–1134.
- 8 Hansen AE, Pedersen H, Rostrup E, Larsson HB. Partial volume effect (PVE) on the arterial input function (AIF) in T1-weighted perfusion imaging and limitations of the multiplicative rescaling approach. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62: 1055–1059.
- 9 Ivancevic MK, Zimine I, Montet X, Hyacinthe JN, Lazeyras F, Foxall D, Vallee JP. Inflow effect correction in fast gradient-echo perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50: 885–891.
- 10 Yang C, Karczmar GS, Medved M, Stadler WM. Estimating the arterial input function using two reference tissues in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI studies: fundamental concepts and simulations. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 1110–1117.
- 11 Yankeelov TE, Luci JJ, Lepage M, Li R, Debusk L, Lin PC, Price RR, Gore JC. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model. Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 23: 519–529.
- 12 Yang C, Karczmar GS, Medved M, Stadler WM. Multiple reference tissue method for contrast agent arterial input function estimation. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58: 1266–1275.
- 13 Medved M, Karczmar G, Yang C, Dignam J, Gajewski TF, Kindler H, Vokes E, MacEneany P, Mitchell MT, Stadler WM. Semiquantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in cancer patients: Variability and changes in tumor tissue over time. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 20: 122–128.
- 14 Joos KM, Blair WF, Brown TD, Gable RH. Flow field mapping in the anesthetized rat. Microsurgery 1990; 11: 12–18.
- 15 McIntyre DJ, Ludwig C, Pasan A, Griffiths JR. A method for interleaved acquisition of a vascular input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in experimental rat tumours. NMR Biomed 2004; 17: 132–143.
- 16 Fan X, Medved M, River JN, Zamora M, Corot C, Robert P, Bourrinet P, Lipton M, Culp RM, Karczmar GS. New model for analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data distinguishes metastatic from nonmetastatic transplanted rodent prostate tumors. Magn Reson Med 2004; 51: 487–494.
- 17 Weidensteiner C, Rausch M, McSheehy PM, Allegrini PR. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in tumor-bearing rats and mice with inversion recovery TrueFISP and two contrast agents at 4.7 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 646–656.
- 18 Yankeelov TE, Cron GO, Addison CL, Wallace JC, Wilkins RC, Pappas BA, Santyr GE, Gore JC. Comparison of a reference region model with direct measurement of an AIF in the analysis of DCE-MRI data. Magn Reson Med 2007; 57: 353–361.
- 19 Yankeelov TE, Rooney WD, Li X, Springer CS,Jr. Variation of the relaxographic “shutter-speed” for transcytolemmal water exchange affects the CR bolus-tracking curve shape. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50: 1151–1169.
- 20 Parker GJ, Roberts C, Macdonald A, Buonaccorsi GA, Cheung S, Buckley DL, Jackson A, Watson Y, Davies K, Jayson GC. Experimentally-derived functional form for a population-averaged high-temporal-resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 993–1000.
- 21
Evelhoch JL.
Key factors in the acquisition of contrast kinetic data for oncology.
J Magn Reson Imaging
1999;
10:
254–259.
10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199909)10:3<254::AID-JMRI5>3.0.CO;2-9 CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 22 Yankeelov TE, Rooney WD, Huang W, Dyke JP, Li X, Tudorica A, Lee JH, Koutcher JA, Springer CS, Jr. Evidence for shutter-speed variation in CR bolus-tracking studies of human pathology. NMR Biomed 2005; 18: 173–185.
- 23 Cheng HL. T1 measurement of flowing blood and arterial input function determination for quantitative 3D T1-weighted DCE-MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 1073–1078.
- 24 Fan X, Karczmar GS. A new approach to analysis of the impulse response function (IRF) in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCEMRI): a simulation study. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62: 229–239.