Volume 44, Issue 1 e31133
CLINICAL ARTICLE

Comparative study of arterial and venous grafting for pedicle lengthening in head and neck microvascular reconstruction

Chieh-Kai Chang MD

Chieh-Kai Chang MD

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veteran General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

Department of Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan

Search for more papers by this author
Cheng-Yeu Wu MD

Cheng-Yeu Wu MD

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veteran General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

Search for more papers by this author
Yi-Ling Lin MD

Corresponding Author

Yi-Ling Lin MD

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veteran General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

Department of Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan

Correspondence

Yi-Ling Lin and Yueh-Chi Tsai, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Blvd., Taichung 40705, Taiwan, ROC.

Email: [email protected]; [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Chih-Shen Lai MD

Chih-Shen Lai MD

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veteran General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan

Search for more papers by this author
Chen-Te Lu MD, PhD

Chen-Te Lu MD, PhD

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veteran General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

Search for more papers by this author
Jung-Hsing Yen MD

Jung-Hsing Yen MD

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veteran General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

Search for more papers by this author
I-Chen Chen MD

I-Chen Chen MD

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veteran General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

Search for more papers by this author
Yueh-Chi Tsai MD

Corresponding Author

Yueh-Chi Tsai MD

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veteran General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

Department of Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan

Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan

Correspondence

Yi-Ling Lin and Yueh-Chi Tsai, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Blvd., Taichung 40705, Taiwan, ROC.

Email: [email protected]; [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 November 2023

Abstract

Background

In the field of head and neck microvascular reconstruction, no previous study has compared arterial and venous grafting as methods of anterolateral thigh (ALT) pedicle lengthening. Therefore, we conducted this comparative study to compare the outcomes between the two pedicle lengthening techniques.

Methods

We performed comparative effectiveness research by conducting a retrospective chart review from January 2012 to December 2021 to identify patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction with non-descending branch ALT perforator flaps using either the in situ pedicle lengthening (ISPL) technique or the vein graft (VG) technique. A total of 26 patients were analyzed, including 14 who underwent ISPL, and 12 who underwent VG. The collected data, including patient demographics, surgical indications, history of prior free flap, prior neck dissection, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, graft length, and flap outcomes, were analyzed. The flap outcomes were categorized as total flap loss, partial flap loss, flap compromise that required operating room visits, or minor issues, including infection or dehiscence. The flap characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results

The VG group had two flap losses, whereas the ISPL group had none. Although the failure rate was higher in the VG group than that in the ISPL group, the difference was not statistically significant (0% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.203). Additionally, there were no significant differences in flap take-back (14.3% vs. 16.7%, p = 1) and minor complications between the two groups (35.7% vs. 33.3%, p = 1).

Conclusions

If pedicle lengthening with vessel graft is inevitable in head and neck reconstruction, arterial graft may provide a reliable outcome and may be considered an effective alternative when compared to vein grafts.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

All authors have nothing to disclose.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.