Volume 44, Issue 1 e31103
CLINICAL ARTICLE

Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous free flap for post-sacrectomy reconstruction: Outcomes compared with gluteal muscle flap

Dianne Dong Un Lee MD

Dianne Dong Un Lee MD

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Samsung Medical Centre, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Se-Jun Park MD, PhD

Se-Jun Park MD, PhD

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Center, Samsung Medical Centre, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Kyeong-Tae Lee MD, PhD

Corresponding Author

Kyeong-Tae Lee MD, PhD

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Samsung Medical Centre, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

Correspondence

Kyeong-Tae Lee, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Samsung Medical Centre, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Ilwon-dong 50, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, South Korea.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 August 2023

Abstract

Background

Excision of sacral tumor results in extensive defects and vital organ exposure, requiring soft tissue reconstruction for dead space obliteration. Diverse reconstruction options, mainly regional flaps, have been utilized but are limited by high postoperative morbidity. A reliable reconstructive method with low morbidity and facilitated recovery has yet been sought for. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the use of free latissimus dorsi (LD) flap for post-sacrectomy defect reconstruction by comparing its outcomes with local gluteus maximus (GM) flap.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of all patients with sacral malignancy who underwent partial or total sacrectomy and immediate reconstruction with LD or GM flap between 2013 and 2022. Nineteen patients were analyzed, including 10 GM flaps and nine LD flaps. Postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results

The average size of LD flaps was 173.8 cm2. Seven patients developed complication in the GM group and two patients in the LD group. Complication rate at sacrectomy site was lower in the LD group (p = .003) showing complication-free sacrectomy site and two donor site seromas. The LD group resulted in shorter hospital stay (p = .033) and earlier ambulation than the GM group (p = .001). Mean follow-up period was 63 months for GM group and 17 months for LD group. Three patients in the GM group underwent re-operation, while no delayed complication was observed in the LD group.

Conclusion

Free LD flaps may provide reliable outcomes with early recovery and may be considered an effective option for sacrectomy defect reconstruction.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.