Volume 37, Issue 1 pp. 29-33
Clinical Article

Lymph node flap transfer for patients with secondary lower limb lymphedema

Bernardo N. Batista M.D.

Corresponding Author

Bernardo N. Batista M.D.

Plastic Surgery Department, Medical School of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil

Correspondence to: Bernardo N. Batista, M.D., Rua Prof. Atílio Innocenti, 683, Itaim Bibi, São Paulo, CEP 045380-001, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Michel Germain M.D., Ph.D.

Michel Germain M.D., Ph.D.

Lymphoedema Center, Clinique Jouvenet, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
José Carlos M. Faria M.D., Ph.D.

José Carlos M. Faria M.D., Ph.D.

Plastic Surgery Department, Medical School of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Corinne Becker M.D.

Corinne Becker M.D.

Lymphoedema Center, Clinique Jouvenet, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 March 2015
Citations: 28

Presented as a free article at: 24th Congress of the International Society of Lymphology, Rome/Italy, September 16-20, 2013; ASPS 2013, San Diego/USA, October 11-15, 2013.

Abstract

Background

Previous authors have shown benefits from the use of lymph node flap transfer (LNFT) to treat lymphedema of the arms, but there is little evidence for its use for lower limb lymphedema. We performed a retrospective analysis of a series of patients suffering from secondary lower limb lymphedema treated with a free LNFT.

Methods

52 cases of LNFT to treat 41 legs in 38 patients with secondary lymphedema were retrospectively reviewed. The causes of the lymphedema included lymphedema secondary to hysterectomy for uterine cancer, melanoma resections on the leg, lymphoma treatment and testicular cancer, cosmetic surgery to the limb, lipoma resection at the inguinal region, and a saphenectomy. Patients had been suffering with lymphedema for an average of 9.1 ± 7.3 years at the time of LNFT.

Results

Eleven patients (28.9%) presented with minor complications treated conservatively. For 23 legs there was enough data to follow limb volume evolution after a single LNFT. Total volume reduction in eight legs (two patients with no measures of the healthy limb and three bilateral) was 7.1 ± 8.6%. Another group of 15 patients with unilateral lymphedema had an average 46.3 ± 34.7% reduction of excess volume. Better results (>30% REV) were associated with smaller preoperative excess volume (P = 0.045).

Conclusion

Patients with secondary leg lymphedema can benefit from LNFT. Results in patients with mild presentations seem to be better than in more severe cases. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 37:29–33, 2017.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.