Volume 126, Issue 10 pp. 2310-2314
Laryngology

Vocal fold motion outcome based on excellent prognosis with laryngeal electromyography

Libby J. Smith DO

Corresponding Author

Libby J. Smith DO

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Voice Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A

Send correspondence to Libby J. Smith, DO, UPMC Mercy, Bldg. B, Suite 11-500, 1400 Locust St., Pittsburgh, PA 15219. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Clark A. Rosen MD

Clark A. Rosen MD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Voice Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A

Search for more papers by this author
Michael C. Munin MD

Michael C. Munin MD

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh Voice Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 31 May 2016
Citations: 20

Presented at the American Laryngological Association Meeting, COSM, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A, April 22–26, 2015.

The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis

As laryngeal electromyography (LEMG) becomes more refined, accurate predictions of vocal fold motion recovery are possible. Focus has been on outcomes for patients with poor prognosis for vocal fold motion recovery. Limited information is available regarding the expected rate of purposeful vocal fold motion recovery when there is good to normal motor recruitment, no signs of denervation, and no signs of synkinetic activity with LEMG, termed excellent prognosis. The objective of this study is to determine the rate of vocal fold motion recovery with excellent prognosis findings on LEMG after acute recurrent laryngeal nerve injury.

Study Design

Retrospective review.

Methods

Patients undergoing a standardized LEMG protocol, consisting of qualitative (evaluation of motor recruitment, motor unit configuration, detection of fibrillations, presence of synkinesis) and quantitative (turns analysis) measurements were evaluated for purposeful vocal-fold motion recovery, calculated after at least 6 months since onset of injury.

Results

Twenty-three patients who underwent LEMG for acute vocal fold paralysis met the inclusion criteria of excellent prognosis. Eighteen patients (78.3%) recovered vocal fold motion, as determined by flexible laryngoscopy.

Conclusion

Nearly 80% of patients determined to have excellent prognosis for vocal fold motion recovery experienced return of vocal fold motion. This information will help clinicians not only counsel their patients on expectations but will also help guide treatment.

Level of Evidence

4. Laryngoscope, 126:2310–2314, 2016

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.