Volume 120, Issue 7 pp. 1397-1404
Otology

Management and outcomes of facial paralysis from intratemporal blunt trauma: A systematic review

John J. Nash MD

John J. Nash MD

Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin and Affiliated Hospitals, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
David R. Friedland MD, PhD

Corresponding Author

David R. Friedland MD, PhD

Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin and Affiliated Hospitals, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, U.S.A.

Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53226Search for more papers by this author
Keren J. Boorsma BS

Keren J. Boorsma BS

Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin and Affiliated Hospitals, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
John S. Rhee MD, MPH

John S. Rhee MD, MPH

Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin and Affiliated Hospitals, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 June 2010
Citations: 52

The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

This paper was presented as a poster at the Triological Combined Sections Meeting, Orlando, FL.

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis:

To systematically review the existing literature on outcomes and management of facial paralysis resulting from intratemporal blunt trauma.

Study Design:

Systematic review of the literature.

Methods:

Thirty-five articles met our inclusion criteria. Outcome variables analyzed included severity of paralysis, time of onset of paralysis, surgical or nonsurgical management, steroid use, and final facial nerve function.

Results:

All studies were classified as level 4 evidence as defined by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. There was marked variation in the quality of the studies with inconsistent outcome measures, diagnostic testing, and follow-up, thus ruling out a formal meta-analysis. In an exploratory pooling of data, 612 cases had sufficient follow-up and facial movement grading for some evaluation of trends. In 189 patients who were followed observationally, 66% achieved an outcome equivalent to House-Brackmann (HB) I, 25% achieving HB II-V, and two patients an HB VI score. Among 83 patients treated with steroids, 67% achieved HB I, 30% HB II-V, and no patients with HB VI. In 340 patients treated surgically, 23% achieved HB I postoperatively, 58% were graded as HB II-V, and 9% with HB grade VI postoperatively. No patient presenting with partial paralysis had an HB VI outcome.

Conclusions:

The role of surgery versus nonsurgical interventions for this clinical entity remains inconclusive. Level 4 evidence studies predominate and are further hindered by poor description of outcome measures and incomplete data reporting. Exploratory pooling of data without formal meta-analysis suggests the need to compare any intervention to the natural course of healing, which overall appears to be favorable. Laryngoscope, 2010

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.