Volume 121, Issue 2 pp. 193-199
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis in mastectomy patients: A 5-year follow-up study

T. N. Diem Vu MD

T. N. Diem Vu MD

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Education and Research, Rochester, Minnesota

Search for more papers by this author
Razan El Melik Pharm D

Razan El Melik Pharm D

Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

Search for more papers by this author
Sharon Nehring RN

Sharon Nehring RN

Department of Nursing, Mayo Clinic College of Education and Research, Rochester, Minnesota

Search for more papers by this author
Whitney Bergquist Pharm D

Whitney Bergquist Pharm D

Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

Search for more papers by this author
Tanya Hoskin MS

Tanya Hoskin MS

Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic College of Education and Research, Rochester, Minnesota

Search for more papers by this author
Courtney Day

Courtney Day

Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic College of Education and Research, Rochester, Minnesota

Search for more papers by this author
James W. Jakub MD

Corresponding Author

James W. Jakub MD

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Education and Research, Rochester, Minnesota

Correspondence James W. Jakub, MD, Division of Breast, Endocrine, Metabolic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 November 2019
Citations: 5

Abstract

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis in breast surgery remains controversial. In 2012, we instituted a practice change of routine chemoprophylaxis for patients with invasive cancer undergoing mastectomy. Herein, we report the effects of this on rates of VTE and hematoma.

Methods

Our 30-day rates of VTE and hematoma requiring reoperation among patients with mastectomy since the practice change were retrospectively collected from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). The subsequent 5-year data (2012-2017) was compared with historic NSQIP data (2006-2010). We utilized information from our 30-day follow-up databank to assess patients not sampled by NSQIP.

Results

After the practice change, the heparin prophylaxis rate rose from 19.5% to 95.6% (P < .001) and the VTE rate fell from 0.8% to 0% (P = .30). There was no significant change in reoperative hematoma rate (P = .39). The majority of the current NSQIP patient population (93.1%) had a Caprini score of 5 or greater. Among 663 patients obtained from 30-day postoperative follow-up, there were 2 VTE (0.3%) and 7 (1.1%) reoperations for hematoma.

Conclusions

The practice change resulted in an increase of VTE chemoprophylaxis without significant change in hematoma incidence. Although not statistically significant, VTE incidence decreased. This supports the use of standardized VTE chemoprophylaxis in this population and warrants further study.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.