MRI of the Pancreas
Kate A. Harrington MB, BCh, BAO
Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAmita Shukla-Dave PhD
Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Search for more papers by this authorRamesh Paudyal PhD
Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Richard K.G. Do MD, PhD
Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Address reprint requests to: Richard Kinh Gian Do, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, C-276F, New York, NY 10065, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorKate A. Harrington MB, BCh, BAO
Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAmita Shukla-Dave PhD
Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Search for more papers by this authorRamesh Paudyal PhD
Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Richard K.G. Do MD, PhD
Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Address reprint requests to: Richard Kinh Gian Do, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, C-276F, New York, NY 10065, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
MRI has played a critical role in the evaluation of patients with pancreatic pathologies, from screening of patients at high risk for pancreatic cancer to the evaluation of pancreatic cysts and indeterminate pancreatic lesions. The high mortality associated with pancreatic adenocarcinomas has spurred much interest in developing effective screening tools, with MRI using magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) playing a central role in the hopes of identifying cancers at earlier stages amenable to curative resection. Ongoing efforts to improve the resolution and robustness of imaging of the pancreas using MRI may thus one day reduce the mortality of this deadly disease. However, the increasing use of cross-sectional imaging has also generated a concomitant clinical conundrum: How to manage incidental pancreatic cystic lesions that are found in over a quarter of patients who undergo MRCP. Efforts to improve the specificity of MRCP for patients with pancreatic cysts and with indeterminate pancreatic masses may be achieved with continued technical advances in MRI, including diffusion-weighted and T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. However, developments in quantitative MRI of the pancreas remain challenging, due to the small size of the pancreas and its upper abdominal location, adjacent to bowel and below the diaphragm. Further research is needed to improve MRI of the pancreas as a clinical tool, to positively affect the lives of patients with pancreatic abnormalities. This review focuses on various MR techniques such as MRCP, quantitative imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging and their clinical applicability in the imaging of the pancreas, with an emphasis on pancreatic malignant and premalignant lesions.
Level of Evidence 5
Technical Efficacy Stage 3
J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2021;53:347–359.
References
- 1Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: A systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102(8): 1781-1788.
- 2Miyazaki T, Yamashita Y, Tsuchigame T, Yamamoto H, Urata J, Takahashi M. MR cholangiopancreatography using HASTE (half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo) sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166(6): 1297-1303.
- 3Yoon LS, Catalano OA, Fritz S, Ferrone CR, Hahn PF, Sahani DV. Another dimension in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: Comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. J Comp Assist Tomogr 2009; 33(3): 363-368.
- 4Chandarana H, Doshi AM, Shanbhogue A, et al. Three-dimensional MR cholangiopancreatography in a breath hold with sparsity-based reconstruction of highly undersampled data. Radiology 2016; 280(2): 585-594.
- 5Taron J, Weiss J, Notohamiprodjo M, et al. Acceleration of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using compressed sensing at 1.5 and 3 T: A clinical feasibility study. Invest Radiol 2018; 53(11): 681-688.
- 6He M, Xu J, Sun Z, et al. Comparison and evaluation of the efficacy of compressed SENSE (CS) and gradient- and spin-echo (GRASE) in breath-hold (BH) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). J Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 51: 824-832.
- 7Seo N, Park MS, Han K, et al. Feasibility of 3D navigator-triggered magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with combined parallel imaging and compressed sensing reconstruction at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017; 46(5): 1289-1297.
- 8Fukukura Y, Fujiyoshi F, Sasaki M, Nakajo M. Pancreatic duct: Morphologic evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 2002; 222(3): 674-680.
- 9Carbognin G, Pinali L, Girardi V, Casarin A, Mansueto G, Mucelli RP. Collateral branches IPMTs: Secretin-enhanced MRCP. Abdom Imaging 2007; 32(3): 374-380.
- 10Bulow R, Simon P, Thiel R, et al. Anatomic variants of the pancreatic duct and their clinical relevance: An MR-guided study in the general population. Eur Radiol 2014; 24(12): 3142-3149.
- 11Zerboni G, Signoretti M, Crippa S, Falconi M, Arcidiacono PG, Capurso G. Systematic review and meta-analysis: Prevalence of incidentally detected pancreatic cystic lesions in asymptomatic individuals. Pancreatology 2019; 19(1): 2-9.
- 12Purysko AS, Gandhi NS, Walsh RM, Obuchowski NA, Veniero JC. Does secretin stimulation add to magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in characterising pancreatic cystic lesions as side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm? Eur Radiol 2014; 24(12): 3134-3141.
- 13Rastegar N, Matteoni-Athayde LG, Eng J, et al. Incremental value of secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in detecting ductal communication in a population with high prevalence of small pancreatic cysts. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84(4): 575-580.
- 14Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 2019; 69(1): 7-34.
- 15Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: The unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res 2014; 74(11): 2913-2921.
- 16 Cancer Statistics Center. Volume 2019: Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2018.
- 17 Cancer Facts and Figures 2019. American Cancer Society. Atlanta, GA; 2019.
- 18Canto MI, Harinck F, Hruban RH, et al. International cancer of the pancreas screening (CAPS) consortium summit on the management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer. Gut 2013; 62(3): 339-347.
- 19Jang KM, Kim SH, Kim YK, Song KD, Lee SJ, Choi D. Missed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Assessment of early imaging findings on prediagnostic magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84(8): 1473-1479.
- 20Corrias G, Raeside MC, Agostini A, et al. Pilot study of rapid MR pancreas screening for patients with BRCA mutation. Eur Radiol 2019; 29(8): 3976-3985.
- 21Corral JE, Mareth KF, Riegert-Johnson DL, Das A, Wallace MB. Diagnostic yield from screening asymptomatic individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17(1): 41-53.
- 22Henrikson NB, Aiello Bowles EJ, Blasi PR, et al. Screening for pancreatic cancer: Updated evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA 2019; 322(5): 445-454.
- 23Canto MI, Hruban RH, Fishman EK, et al. Frequent detection of pancreatic lesions in asymptomatic high-risk individuals. Gastroenterology 2012; 142(4): 796-804; quiz e714–795.
- 24Del Chiaro M, Verbeke CS, Kartalis N, et al. Short-term results of a magnetic resonance imaging-based Swedish screening program for individuals at risk for pancreatic cancer. JAMA Surg 2015; 150(6): 512-518.
- 25Verna EC, Hwang C, Stevens PD, et al. Pancreatic cancer screening in a prospective cohort of high-risk patients: A comprehensive strategy of imaging and genetics. Clin Cancer Res 2010; 16(20): 5028-5037.
- 26Canto MI, Almario JA, Schulick RD, et al. Risk of neoplastic progression in individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer undergoing long-term surveillance. Gastroenterology 2018; 155(3): 740-751. e742.
- 27Laffan TA, Horton KM, Klein AP, et al. Prevalence of unsuspected pancreatic cysts on MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191(3): 802-807.
- 28Zhang XM, Mitchell DG, Dohke M, Holland GA, Parker L. Pancreatic cysts: Depiction on single-shot fast spin-echo MR images. Radiology 2002; 223(2): 547-553.
- 29Basturk O, Hong SM, Wood LD, et al. A revised classification system and recommendations from the Baltimore consensus meeting for neoplastic precursor lesions in the pancreas. Am J Surg Pathol 2015; 39(12): 1730-1741.
- 30Tanaka M, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Adsay V, et al. International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2012; 12(3): 183-197.
- 31Tanaka M, Chari S, Adsay V, et al. International consensus guidelines for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2006; 6(1–2): 17-32.
- 32Tanaka M, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Kamisawa T, et al. Revisions of international consensus Fukuoka guidelines for the management of IPMN of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2017; 17(5): 738-753.
- 33Choi SY, Kim JH, Yu MH, Eun HW, Lee HK, Han JK. Diagnostic performance and imaging features for predicting the malignant potential of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: A comparison of EUS, contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017; 42(5): 1449-1458.
- 34Kang HJ, Lee JM, Joo I, et al. Assessment of malignant potential in Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: Comparison between multidetector CT and MR imaging with MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 2016; 279(1): 128-139.
- 35Seo N, Byun JH, Kim JH, et al. Validation of the 2012 international consensus guidelines using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: Branch duct and main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Ann Surg 2016; 263(3): 557-564.
- 36Hwang J, Kim YK, Min JH, Jeong WK, Hong SS, Kim HJ. Comparison between MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography for differentiating malignant from benign mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Eur Radiol 2018; 28(1): 179-187.
- 37Uribarri-Gonzalez L, Keane MG, Pereira SP, Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Larino-Noia J. Agreement among magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRI-MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the evaluation of morphological features of branch duct Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (BD-IPMN). Pancreatology 2018; 18(2): 170-175.
- 38Macari M, Lee T, Kim S, et al. Is gadolinium necessary for MRI follow-up evaluation of cystic lesions in the pancreas? Preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192(1): 159-164.
- 39Pozzi-Mucelli RM, Rinta-Kiikka I, Wunsche K, et al. Pancreatic MRI for the surveillance of cystic neoplasms: Comparison of a short with a comprehensive imaging protocol. Eur Radiol 2017; 27(1): 41-50.
- 40Lee JE, Choi SY, Min JH, et al. Determining malignant potential of Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: CT versus MRI by using revised 2017 international consensus guidelines. Radiology 2019; 293(1): 134-143.
- 41Kang JS, Park T, Han Y, et al. Clinical validation of the 2017 international consensus guidelines on intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. Ann Surg Treat Res 2019; 97(2): 58-64.
- 42de Jong K, Nio CY, Mearadji B, et al. Disappointing interobserver agreement among radiologists for a classifying diagnosis of pancreatic cysts using magnetic resonance imaging. Pancreas 2012; 41(2): 278-282.
- 43Do RK, Katz SS, Gollub MJ, et al. Interobserver agreement for detection of malignant features of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas on MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 203(5): 973-979.
- 44Kim SH, Lee JM, Lee ES, et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: Evaluation of malignant potential and surgical resectability by using MR imaging with MR cholangiography. Radiology 2015; 274(3): 723-733.
- 45Padhani AR, Khan AA. Diffusion-weighted (DW) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for monitoring anticancer therapy. Target Oncol 2010; 5(1): 39-52.
- 46Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 168(2): 497-505.
- 47Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10(3): 223-232.
10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199909)10:3<223::AID-JMRI2>3.0.CO;2-S CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 48Shukla-Dave A, Obuchowski NA, Chenevert TL, et al. Quantitative imaging biomarkers alliance (QIBA) recommendations for improved precision of DWI and DCE-MRI derived biomarkers in multicenter oncology trials. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 49(7): E101-E121.
- 49Le Bihan D. Diffusion MRI: What the water molecule tells us about the brain. Febs J 2014; 281: 2-2.
- 50Stejskal EO and Tanner JE. Spin diffusion measurements: Spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J Chem Phys 1965; 42(1): 288-292.
- 51Colagrande S, Belli G, Politi LS, Mannelli L, Pasquinelli F, Villari N. The influence of diffusion- and relaxation-related factors on signal intensity: An introductive guide to magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging studies. J Comp Assist Tomogr 2008; 32(3): 463-474.
- 52Barral M, Taouli B, Guiu B, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the pancreas: Current status and recommendations. Radiology 2015; 274(1): 45-63.
- 53Fukukura Y, Shindo T, Hakamada H, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the pancreas: Optimizing b-value for visualization of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur Radiol 2016; 26(10): 3419-3427.
- 54Schoennagel BP, Habermann CR, Roesch M, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the healthy pancreas: Apparent diffusion coefficient values of the normal head, body, and tail calculated from different sets of b-values. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 34(4): 861-865.
- 55Herrmann J, Schoennagel BP, Roesch M, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the healthy pancreas: ADC values are age and gender dependent. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 37(4): 886-891.
- 56Sato T, Ito K, Tamada T, et al. Age-related changes in normal adult pancreas: MR imaging evaluation. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81(9): 2093-2098.
- 57Kang KM, Lee JM, Shin CI, et al. Added value of diffusion-weighted imaging to MR cholangiopancreatography with unenhanced MR imaging for predicting malignancy or invasiveness of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 38(3): 555-563.
- 58Jang KM, Kim SH, Min JH, et al. Value of diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiating malignant from benign intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 203(5): 992-1000.
- 59Fattahi R, Balci NC, Perman WH, et al. Pancreatic diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI): Comparison between mass-forming focal pancreatitis (FP), pancreatic cancer (PC), and normal pancreas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 29(2): 350-356.
- 60Wiggermann P, Grutzmann R, Weissenbock A, Kamusella P, Dittert DD, Stroszczynski C. Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements of the pancreas, pancreas carcinoma, and mass-forming focal pancreatitis. Acta Radiol (Stockholm, Sweden: 1987) 2012; 53(2): 135-139.
- 61Muraoka N, Uematsu H, Kimura H, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient in pancreatic cancer: Characterization and histopathological correlations. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27(6): 1302-1308.
- 62Wang Y, Chen ZE, Nikolaidis P, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinomas: Association with histopathology and tumor grade. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 33(1): 136-142.
- 63Erkan M, Reiser-Erkan C, Michalski CW, et al. Cancer-stellate cell interactions perpetuate the hypoxia-fibrosis cycle in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Neoplasia 2009; 11(5): 497-508.
- 64Lee SS, Byun JH, Park BJ, et al. Quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas: Usefulness in characterizing solid pancreatic masses. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28(4): 928-936.
- 65Rosenkrantz AB, Matza BW, Sabach A, Hajdu CH, Hindman N. Pancreatic cancer: Lack of association between apparent diffusion coefficient values and adverse pathological features. Clin Radiol 2013; 68(4): e191-e197.
- 66Wang Y, Miller FH, Chen ZE, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of solid and cystic lesions of the pancreas. Radiographics 2011; 31(3): E47-E64.
- 67Hayano K, Miura F, Amano H, et al. Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient measured by diffusion-weighted MRI and clinicopathologic features in pancreatic cancer patients. J Hepatobil Pancreat Sci 2013; 20(2): 243-248.
- 68Niwa T, Ueno M, Ohkawa S, et al. Advanced pancreatic cancer: The use of the apparent diffusion coefficient to predict response to chemotherapy. Br J Radiol 2009; 82(973): 28-34.
- 69Cuneo KC, Chenevert TL, Ben-Josef E, et al. A pilot study of diffusion-weighted MRI in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic cancer. Transl Oncol 2014; 7(5): 644-649.
- 70Pereira JA, Rosado E, Bali M, Metens T, Chao SL. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Correlation between histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps and tumor grade. Abdom Imaging 2015; 40(8): 3122-3128.
- 71De Robertis R, Maris B, Cardobi N, et al. Can histogram analysis of MR images predict aggressiveness in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors? Eur Radiol 2018; 28(6): 2582-2591.
- 72Hoffman DH, Ream JM, Hajdu CH, Rosenkrantz AB. Utility of whole-lesion ADC histogram metrics for assessing the malignant potential of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017; 42(4): 1222-1228.
- 73Shindo T, Fukukura Y, Umanodan T, et al. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating pancreatic adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumor. Medicine 2016; 95(4):e2574.
- 74Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: Consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 2009; 11(2): 102-125.
- 75Le Bihan D, Johansen-Berg H. Diffusion MRI at 25: Exploring brain tissue structure and function. Neuroimage 2012; 61(2): 324-341.
- 76Koh DM, Collins DJ, Orton MR. Intravoxel incoherent motion in body diffusion-weighted MRI: Reality and challenges. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196(6): 1351-1361.
- 77De Robertis R, Cardobi N, Ortolani S, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of solid pancreatic masses: Reliability and usefulness for characterization. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44(1): 131-139.
- 78Kang KM, Lee JM, Yoon JH, Kiefer B, Han JK, Choi BI. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging for characterization of focal pancreatic lesions. Radiology 2014; 270(2): 444-453.
- 79Klau M, Mayer P, Bergmann F, et al. Correlation of histological vessel characteristics and diffusion-weighted imaging Intravoxel incoherent motion-derived parameters in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Invest Radiol 2015; 50(11): 792-797.
- 80Lee JH, Cheong H, Lee SS, et al. Perfusion assessment using Intravoxel incoherent motion-based analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: Validation through phantom experiments. Invest Radiol 2016; 51(8): 520-528.
- 81Andreou A, Koh DM, Collins DJ, et al. Measurement reproducibility of perfusion fraction and pseudodiffusion coefficient derived by intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging in normal liver and metastases. Eur Radiol 2013; 23(2): 428-434.
- 82Saritas EU, Cunningham CH, Lee JH, Han ET, Nishimura DG. DWI of the spinal cord with reduced FOV single-shot EPI. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60(2): 468-473.
- 83Ma C, Li YJ, Pan CS, et al. High resolution diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas using reduced field of view single-shot echo-planar imaging at 3 T. Magn Reson Imaging 2014; 32(2): 125-131.
- 84Mannelli L, Monti S, Corrias G, et al. Comparison of navigator triggering reduced field of view and large field of view diffusion-weighted imaging of the pancreas. J Comp Assist Tomogr 2019; 43(1): 143-148.
- 85Kim H, Morgan DE, Schexnailder P, et al. Accurate therapeutic response assessment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with a point-of-care perfusion phantom: A pilot study. Invest Radiol 2019; 54(1): 16-22.
- 86 Committee DMT. DCE MRI Quantification Profile, Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance. RSNA. Volume Version 1.0; 2012.
- 87Kim JH, Lee JM, Park JH, et al. Solid pancreatic lesions: Characterization by using timing bolus dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging assessment–a preliminary study. Radiology 2013; 266(1): 185-196.
- 88Kim H, Arnoletti PJ, Christein J, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A pilot study of quantitative perfusion and diffusion-weighted breath-hold magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging 2014; 39(4): 744-752.
- 89Jackson A, Li KL, Zhu XP. Semi-quantitative parameter analysis of DCE-MRI revisited: Monte-Carlo simulation, clinical comparisons, and clinical validation of measurement errors in patients with type 2 neurofibromatosis. PLos One 2014; 9(3).e90300.
- 90Sourbron S, Ingrisch M, Siefert A, Reiser M, Herrmann K. Quantification of cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, and blood-brain-barrier leakage with DCE-MRI. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62(1): 205-217.
- 91Li X, Welch EB, Chakravarthy AB, et al. Statistical comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI pharmacokinetic models in human breast cancer. Magn Reson Med 2012; 68: 261-271.
- 92Paudyal R, Lu Y, Hatzoglou V, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI model selection for predicting tumor aggressiveness in papillary thyroid cancers. NMR Biomed 2020; 33(1):e4166.
- 93Huh J, Choi Y, Woo DC, et al. Feasibility of test-bolus DCE-MRI using CAIPIRINHA-VIBE for the evaluation of pancreatic malignancies. Eur Radiol 2016; 26(11): 3949-3956.
- 94Akisik MF, Sandrasegaran K, Bu G, Lin C, Hutchins GD, Chiorean EG. Pancreatic cancer: Utility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in assessment of antiangiogenic therapy. Radiology 2010; 256(2): 441-449.
- 95Kim M, Jang KM, Kim JH, et al. Differentiation of mass-forming focal pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Value of characterizing dynamic enhancement patterns on contrast-enhanced MR images by adding signal intensity color mapping. Eur Radiol 2017; 27(4): 1722-1732.
- 96Shi Y, Glaser KJ, Venkatesh SK, Ben-Abraham EI, Ehman RL. Feasibility of using 3D MR elastography to determine pancreatic stiffness in healthy volunteers. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015; 41(2): 369-375.
- 97Shi Y, Liu Y, Gao F, et al. Pancreatic stiffness quantified with MR Elastography: Relationship to postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoenteric anastomosis. Radiology 2018; 288(2): 476-484.
- 98Kolipaka A, Schroeder S, Mo X, Shah Z, Hart PA, Conwell DL. Magnetic resonance elastography of the pancreas: Measurement reproducibility and relationship with age. Magn Reson Imaging 2017; 42: 1-7.
- 99Tirkes T, Yadav D, Conwell DL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging as a non-invasive method for the assessment of pancreatic fibrosis (MINIMAP): A comprehensive study design from the consortium for the study of chronic pancreatitis, diabetes, and pancreatic cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44(8): 2809-2821.