Volume 33, Issue 5 p. spcone
Cover Image

On the use of a spin-echo based double inversion recovery acquisition for the measurement of cortical brain thickness

Yoonho Nam MS

Yoonho Nam MS

Yonsei University, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Eung Yeop Kim MD

Eung Yeop Kim MD

Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Sciences, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Dong-Hyun Kim PhD

Corresponding Author

Dong-Hyun Kim PhD

Yonsei University, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Seoul, Korea

Yonsei University, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Seoul, KoreaSearch for more papers by this author
First published: 02 August 2012

Abstract

Purpose:

To determine whether a spin-echo-based sequence, which are inherently insensitive to magnetic field inhomogeneity, can be used for brain cortical thickness measurement studies.

Materials and Methods:

By using a double inversion recovery (DIR) spin-echo-based sequence, cortical thickness estimates were performed from data acquired from seven healthy volunteers. The cortical thickness was also calculated from data acquired using an MPRAGE sequence and the Bland-Altman analysis was performed for comparison of the two methods. The average signal and contrast to noise ratios (SNR, CNR) of the two methods were also calculated.

Results:

The bias over the entire brain between DIR and MPRAGE was 0.87 ± 0.08 mm. The bias calculated in the major regional lobes were temporal: 0.76 ± 0.09 mm, frontal: 0.89 ± 0.07 mm, parietal: 0.92 ± 0.10 mm, occipital: 0.75 ± 0.12 mm, and cingulate: 0.79 ± 0.10 mm. This thickness difference was due mainly to the boundary difference in the MPRAGE and DIR at the grey matter/cerebral spinal fluid (GM/CSF) regions. The mean SNR and CNR was CNRMPRAGE = 47.8 ± 8.4 and CNRDIR = 19.2 ± 2.9, SNRMPRAGE = 76.8 ± 10.5 and SNRDIR = 21.1 ± 2.8.

Conclusion:

The study suggests that cortical thickness measurements can be performed using a DIR spin-echo sequence, which is inherently immune to main field inhomogeneity. Larger thickness measurements were consistently observed in DIR compared with MPRAGE. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2011;33:1218–1223. © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.