Volume 32, Issue 4 pp. 859-868
Original Research

Percent infarct mapping for delayed contrast enhancement magnetic resonance imaging to quantify myocardial viability by Gd(DTPA)

Tamás Simor MD, PhD

Tamás Simor MD, PhD

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Elgavish Paramagnetics Inc., Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Heart Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Pécs, Hungary

Search for more papers by this author
Pál Surányi MD, PhD

Pál Surányi MD, PhD

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Elgavish Paramagnetics Inc., Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Balázs Ruzsics MD, Phd

Balázs Ruzsics MD, Phd

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Elgavish Paramagnetics Inc., Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Heart Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Pécs, Hungary

Search for more papers by this author
Attila Tóth MD

Attila Tóth MD

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Elgavish Paramagnetics Inc., Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Levente Tóth MD

Levente Tóth MD

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Elgavish Paramagnetics Inc., Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Pál Kiss MD

Pál Kiss MD

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Elgavish Paramagnetics Inc., Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Brigitta C. Brott MD

Brigitta C. Brott MD

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ákos Varga-Szemes MD

Ákos Varga-Szemes MD

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Elgavish Paramagnetics Inc., Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Heart Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Pécs, Hungary

Search for more papers by this author
Ada Elgavish PhD

Ada Elgavish PhD

Elgavish Paramagnetics Inc., Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Gabriel A. Elgavish PhD

Corresponding Author

Gabriel A. Elgavish PhD

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Elgavish Paramagnetics Inc., Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Genetics, MCLM 556, Birmingham, AL 35294-0005Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 September 2010
Citations: 11

Abstract

Purpose

To demonstrate the advantages of signal intensity percent-infarct-mapping (SI-PIM) using the standard delayed enhancement (DE) acquisition in assessing viability following myocardial infarction (MI). SI-PIM quantifies MI density with a voxel-by-voxel resolution in clinically used DE images.

Materials and Methods

In canines (n= 6), 96 hours after reperfused MI and administration of 0.2 mmol/kg Gd(DTPA), ex vivo DE images were acquired and SI-PIMs calculated. SI-PIM data were compared with data from DE images analyzed with several thresholding levels using SIremote+2SD, SIremote+6SD, SI full width half maximum (SIFWHM), and with triphenyl-tetrazolium-chloride (TTC) staining. SI-PIM was also compared to R1 percent infarct mapping (R1-PIM).

Results

Left ventricular infarct volumes (IV) in DE images, IVSIremote+2SD and IVSIremote+6SD, overestimated (P < 0.05) TTC by medians of 13.21 mL [10.2; 15.2] and 6.2 mL [3.79; 8.23], respectively. SIFWHM, SI-PIM, and R1-PIM, however, only nonsignificantly underestimated TTC, by medians of −0.10 mL [−0.12, −0.06], −0.86 mL [−1.04; 1.54], and −1.30 mL [−4.99; −0.29], respectively. The infarct-involved voxel volume (IIVV) of SI-PIM, 32.4 mL [21.2, 46.3] is higher (P < 0.01) than IIVVs of SIFWHM 8.3 mL [3.79, 19.0]. SI-PIMFWHM, however, underestimates TTC (−5.74 mL [−11.89; −2.52] (P < 0.01)). Thus, SI-PIM outperforms SIFWHM because larger IIVVs are obtained, and thus PIs both in the rim and the core of the infarcted tissue are characterized, in contradistinction from DE-SIFWHM, which shows mainly the infarct core.

Conclusion

We have shown here, ex vivo, that SI-PIM has the same advantages as R1-PIM, but it is based on the scanning sequences of DE imaging, and thus it is obtainable within the same short scanning time as DE. This makes it a practical method for clinical studies. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;32:859–868. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.