Volume 30, Issue 1 pp. 185-193
Original Research

Automated assessment of whole-body adipose tissue depots from continuously moving bed MRI: A feasibility study

Joel Kullberg PhD

Corresponding Author

Joel Kullberg PhD

Department of Radiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

MRT, Entrance 24, Uppsala University Hospital, SE-751 85 UPPSALA, SwedenSearch for more papers by this author
Lars Johansson PhD

Lars Johansson PhD

Department of Radiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Håkan Ahlström MD, PhD

Håkan Ahlström MD, PhD

Department of Radiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Frederic Courivaud PhD

Frederic Courivaud PhD

MR Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare, Oslo, Norway

Search for more papers by this author
Peter Koken MS

Peter Koken MS

Philips Research Europe, Hamburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Holger Eggers PhD

Holger Eggers PhD

Philips Research Europe, Hamburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Peter Börnert PhD

Peter Börnert PhD

Philips Research Europe, Hamburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 June 2009
Citations: 70

Abstract

Purpose

To present an automated algorithm for segmentation of visceral, subcutaneous, and total volumes of adipose tissue depots (VAT, SAT, TAT) from whole-body MRI data sets and to investigate the VAT segmentation accuracy and the reproducibility of all depot assessments.

Materials and Methods

Repeated measurements were performed on 24 volunteer subjects using a 1.5 Tesla clinical MRI scanner and a three-dimensional (3D) multi-gradient-echo sequence (resolution: 2.1 × 2.1 × 8 mm3, acquisition time: 5 min 15 s). Fat and water images were reconstructed, and fully automated segmentation was performed. Manual segmentation of the VAT reference was performed by an experienced operator.

Results

Strong correlation (R = 0.999) was found between the automated and manual VAT assessments. The automated results underestimated VAT with 4.7 ± 4.4%. The accuracy was 88 ± 4.5% and 7.6 ± 5.7% for true positive and false positive fractions, respectively. Coefficients of variation from the repeated measurements were: 2.32 % ± 2.61%, 2.25% ± 2.10%, and 1.01% ± 0.74% for VAT, SAT, and TAT, respectively.

Conclusion

Automated and manual VAT results correlated strongly. The assessments of all depots were highly reproducible. The acquisition and postprocessing techniques presented are likely useful in obesity related studies. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009;30:185–193. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.