To implement IDEAL (iterative decomposition of water and fat using echo asymmetry and least squares estimation) water-fat separation with 3D time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of intracranial vessels for improved background suppression by providing uniform and robust separation of fat signal that appears bright on conventional TOF-MRA.

Materials and Methods

IDEAL TOF-MRA and conventional TOF-MRA were performed in volunteers and patients undergoing routine brain MRI/MRA on a 3T magnet. Images were reviewed by two radiologists and graded based on vessel visibility and image quality.

Results

IDEAL TOF-MRA demonstrated statistically significant improvement in vessel visibility when compared to conventional TOF-MRA in both volunteer and clinical patients using an image quality grading system. Overall image quality was 3.87 (out of 4) for IDEAL versus 3.55 for conventional TOF imaging (P = 0.02). Visualization of the ophthalmic artery was 3.53 for IDEAL versus 1.97 for conventional TOF imaging (P < 0.00005) and visualization of the superficial temporal artery was 3.92 for IDEAL imaging versus 1.97 for conventional TOF imaging (P < 0.00005).

Conclusion

By providing uniform suppression of fat, IDEAL TOF-MRA provides improved background suppression with improved image quality when compared to conventional TOF-MRA methods. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009;29:1367–1374. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

REFERENCES

1 Nishimura DG. Time-of-flight MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1990; 14: 194–201.
10.1002/mrm.1910140206
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
2 Oelerich M, Lentschig MG, Zunker P, Reimer P, Rummeny EJ, Schuierer G. Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: comparison of 3D time-of-flight and 3D phase-contrast MR angiography. Neuroradiology 1998; 40: 567–573.
10.1007/s002340050645
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
3 Unlu E, Cakir B, Gocer B, Tuncbilek N, Gedikoglu M. The role of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of recently ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a comparative study. Neuroradiology 2005; 47: 780–791.
10.1007/s00234-005-1424-2
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
4 Bernstein MA, Huston J, Lin C, Gibbs GF, Felmlee JP. High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0 T: technical considerations and initial experience. Magn Reson Med 2001; 46: 955–962.
10.1002/mrm.1282
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
5 Ozsarlak O, Van Goethem JW, Parizel PM. 3D time-of-flight MRA angiography of the intracranial vessels: optimization of technique with water excitation, parallel acquisition, eight-channel phased-array head coil and low-dose contrast administration. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 2067–2071.
10.1007/s00330-004-2411-4
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
6 Lin W, Tkach JA, Haacke EM, Masaryk TJ. Intracranial MR angiography: application of magnetization transfer contrast and fat saturation to short gradient-echo, velocity-compensated sequences. Radiology 1993; 186: 753–761.
10.1148/radiology.186.3.8430184
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
7 Jager HR, Ellamushi H, Moore EA, Grieve JP, Kitchen ND, Taylor WJ. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of intracranial giant aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 1900–1907.
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
8 Sadowski EA, Bennett LK, Chan MR, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: risk factors and incidence estimation. Radiology 2007; 243: 148–157.
10.1148/radiol.2431062144
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
9 Marckmann P, Skov L, Rossen K, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: suspected causative role of gadodiamide used for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17: 2359–2362.
10.1681/ASN.2006060601
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
10 Broome DR, Girguis MS, Baron PW, Cottrell AC, Kjellin I, Kirk GA. Gadodiamide-associated nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: why radiologists should be concerned. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 586–592.
10.2214/AJR.06.1094
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
11 Gizewski ER, Ladd ME, Paul A, Wanke I, Goricke S, Forsting M. Water excitation: a possible pitfall in cerebral time-of-flight angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 152–155.
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
12 Shonai T, Carpenter JS, Lemieux SK, et al. Improvement of vessel visibility in time-of-flight MR angiography of the brain. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27: 1362–1370.
10.1002/jmri.21371
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
13 Thomas SD, Al-Kwifi O, Emery DJ, Wilman AH. Application of magnetization transfer at 3.0 T in three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial arteries. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15: 479–483.
10.1002/jmri.10085
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
14 Reeder SB, Pineda AR, Wen Z, et al. Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL): application with fast spin-echo imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 636–644.
10.1002/mrm.20624
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
15 Reeder SB, Hargreaves BA, Yu H, Brittain JH. Homodyne reconstruction and IDEAL water-fat decomposition. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 586–593.
10.1002/mrm.20586
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
16 Pineda AR, Reeder SB, Wen Z, Pelc NJ. Cramer-Rao bounds for three-point decomposition of water and fat. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 625–635.
10.1002/mrm.20623
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
17 Dixon WT. Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 1984; 153: 189–194.
10.1148/radiology.153.1.6089263
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
18 Glover GH, Schneider E. Three-point-Dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correction. Magn Reson Med 1991; 18: 371–383.
10.1002/mrm.1910180211
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
19 Xiang QS, An L. Water-fat imaging with direct phase encoding. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7: 1002–1015.
10.1002/jmri.1880070612
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
20 Ma J. Breath-hold water and fat imaging using a dual-echo two-point Dixon technique with an efficient and robust phase-correction algorithm. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 415–419.
10.1002/mrm.20146
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
21 Reeder S, McKenzie CA, Pineda AR, et al. Water-fat separation with IDEAL gradient-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 644–652.
10.1002/jmri.20831
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
22 Nayak KS, Hargreaves BA, Hu BS, Nishimura DG, Pauly JM, Meyer CH. Spiral balanced steady-state free precession cardiac imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53: 1468–1473.
10.1002/mrm.20489
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
23 Siepmann DB, McGovern J, Brittain JH, Reeder SB. High-resolution 3D cartilage imaging with IDEAL-SPGR at 3T. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189: 1510–1515.
10.2214/AJR.07.2661
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
24 Noll DC, Nishimura DG, Macovski A. Homodyne detection in magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1991; 10: 154–163.
10.1109/42.79473
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
25 Pruessman KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42: 952–962.
10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199911)42:5<952::AID-MRM16>3.0.CO;2-S
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
26 Yu H, Reeder SB, Shimakawa A, Brittain JH, Pelc NJ. Field map estimation with a region growing scheme for iterative 3-point water-fat decomposition. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 1032–1039.
10.1002/mrm.20654
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
27 Brittain JH, Reeder SB, Shimakawa A, et al. Non-contrast-enhanced angiography at 3T using SSFP and “Dixon” fat-water separation. In: Proc 12th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Kyoto, 2004 (abstract 12).
Google Scholar
28 Brau ACS, McKenzie CA, Shimakawa A et al. Accelerated IDEAL water-fat separation techniques for single- and multi-coil applications. In: Proc 13th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Miami Beach, 2005 (abstract 491).
Google Scholar
29 Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, The National Alliance for Health Information Technology Report to the Office of the National Coordinator For Health Information Technology: Defining Key Health Information Terms; 2008.
Google Scholar
30 Yu H, McKenzie CA, Shimakawa A et al. Multiecho reconstruction for simultaneous water-fat decomposition and T2* estimation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 26: 1153–1161.
10.1002/jmri.21090
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
31 Yu H, McKenzie CA, Shimakawa A, et al. Parallel imaging accelerated single acquisition water-fat separation for dynamic imaging. In: Proc 12th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Miami, 2005 (abstract 2390).
Google Scholar
32 Nael K, Villablanca JP, Saleh R, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: A comparison with time-of-flight MR angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 2118–2121.
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
33 Anzalone N. Contrast-enhanced MRA of intracranial vessels. Eur Radiol Suppl 2005; 15(Suppl 5): E3–E10.
10.1007/s10406-005-0160-3
Web of Science® Google Scholar
34 Rutke R, Lang W, Fellner C, et al. High-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with elliptical centric k-space ordering of supra-aortic arteries compared with selective x-ray angiography. Stroke 2002; 33: 1522–1529.
10.1161/01.STR.0000016972.70366.D6
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume29, Issue6

June 2009

Pages 1367-1374

Improved time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with IDEAL water-fat separation

Abstract

Purpose

Materials and Methods

Results

Conclusion

REFERENCES

Citing Literature

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Improved time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with IDEAL water-fat separation

Abstract

Purpose

Materials and Methods

Results

Conclusion

REFERENCES

Citing Literature

References

Related

Information