Volume 76, Issue 6 pp. 1015-1029
CLINICAL PRACTICE

Implementation and feasibility considerations of an avatar-based intervention for military family caregivers

Sherrie L. Wilcox

Corresponding Author

Sherrie L. Wilcox

Division of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland

Correspondence Sherrie L. Wilcox, Division of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Room A-2063, Bethesda, MD 20814.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 November 2019
Citations: 6

Abstract

Objective

Military family caregivers (MFCGs) are a growing population with well-being and quality of life (QOL) challenges. New technologies can help meet their needs while minimizing disruption to caregiving responsibilities. Preliminary research needs to address intervention implementation challenges before larger-scale efficacy studies are conducted. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of implementing an avatar-based intervention and preliminarily investigate outcomes.

Methods

One-hundred twenty-four MFCGs were recruited to participate in this feasibility study. Sixty-four MFCGs completed the intervention. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance to assess 3- and 6-month differences.

Results

Meeting the a priori goal of 50 MFCGs completing the program supported feasibility. Preliminary results indicated significant reductions in depression, anxiety, and somatic symptoms, and significant improvements in physical health and overall QOL.

Conclusions

Findings support for the feasibility of implementing an avatar-based intervention for MFCGs and present promising findings related to improving caregiver well-being and overall QOL.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The contents, views or opinions expressed in this publication or presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, the Department of Defense, or Departments of the Army, Navy, or Air Force.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.