Volume 59, Issue 10 pp. 1117-1124
Research Article

Depersonalization, fantasies, and coping behavior in clinical context*

Uwe Wolfradt

Corresponding Author

Uwe Wolfradt

Martin-Luther-Universität

Department of Psychology, Martin-Luther-University, Postfach 1108, D-06099 Halle, GermanySearch for more papers by this author
Stefanie Engelmann

Stefanie Engelmann

Martin-Luther-Universität

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 August 2003
Citations: 9
*

*Originally published in Volume 55, Number 2, 1999, pages 225–232.

Abstract

The main purpose of the present study was to determine the relation between specific dissociative experiences (depersonalization, fantasies) and self-reported coping behavior in a clinical (depression, anxiety, schizophrenia) and nonclinical sample (normal adults). Dissociative experiences were assessed with the Questionnaire of Experiences of Dissociation (QED) of Riley (1988) and coping behavior with the Stress-Process Questionnaire (SPQ; Janke, Erdmann, & Boucsein, 1985). A factor analysis of the QED items revealed a two-factor extraction: Factor 1 “depersonalization” and Factor 2 “fantasies/daydreams.” The clinical group scored higher on the QED factor “depersonalization” and had more passive forms of coping behavior (resignation, social isolation, self-compassion, self-blame) than the normal adults. Similar correlation patterns were found for both groups: The QED factor “depersonalization” correlated highly with the coping behaviors “resignation,” “social isolation,” “self-blame,” “self-compassion,” and “rumination.” No correlation between Factor 2 “fantasies/daydreams” and the coping behavior was found. Finally, correlations between depersonalization, trait anxiety, and personal need for structure were reported. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol, 2003.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.