Hemostatic efficiency of modern topical sealants: Comparative evaluation after liver resection and splenic laceration in a swine model
Hamidreza Fonouni
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorArash Kashfi
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorAli Majlesara
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorOliver Stahlheber
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorLukas Konstantinidis
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorNegin Gharabaghi
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorThomas W. Kraus
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Arianeb Mehrabi
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Correspondence to: A. Mehrabi, e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorHani Oweira
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorHamidreza Fonouni
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorArash Kashfi
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorAli Majlesara
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorOliver Stahlheber
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorLukas Konstantinidis
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorNegin Gharabaghi
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorThomas W. Kraus
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Arianeb Mehrabi
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Correspondence to: A. Mehrabi, e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorHani Oweira
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Parenchymal transection during hepatobiliary surgery can disrupt small vasculature or bile ducts, which could be managed difficultly. Sealants are helpful tools to achieve better hemostasis. The aim of this study is to analyze the hemostatic efficiency of four modern sealants in a porcine model. In this study, 40 landrace pigs were assigned equally to the control (without sealant) and four sealant groups. Standardized liver resection and splenic lesions were performed and left without using sealant (control) or treated with one of the following sealants: TachoSil®, Tissucol Duo®, Coseal®, and FloSeal®. We measured relative and absolute bleeding times (seconds) as well as total blood loss (g) in a maximum observation time of 300 s. Sealants could show a significantly improved hemostasis comparing to the control group. However, hemostasis was heterogeneous among the sealant groups (liver resection: 60%–100%, spleen injury: 70%–100%). The mean blood loss decreased significantly using sealants comparing to control group (liver resection: 6–120 fold, spleen injury: 2.5–36 fold). The hemostatic time in groups that achieved complete hemostasis was different in each sealant group (liver resection: 30–166 s, spleen injury: 60–180 s). We conclude that the hemostatic efficacy of modern sealants is impressive but heterogeneous in liver resection or splenic lesion. To maximize the effectiveness of these tools, the indication of each sealant should be carefully considered in individual settings by the surgeons. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 106B: 1307–1316, 2018.
REFERENCES
- 1 Yamashita Y, Hamatsu T, Rikimaru T, Tanaka S, Shirabe K, Shimada M, Sugimachi K. Bile leakage after hepatic resection. Ann Surg 2001; 33: 45–50.
- 2 Simillis, C., T. Li, J. Vaughan, L.A. Becker, B.R. Davidson, and K.S. Gurusamy, Methods to decrease blood loss during liver resection: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 4: Cd010683.
- 3 Noun, R., D. Elias, P. Balladur, H. Bismuth, R. Parc, P. Lasser, and J. Belghiti, Fibrin glue effectiveness and tolerance after elective liver resection: a randomized trial. Hepatogastroenterology 1996; 43: 221–224.
- 4 Kobayashi S, Nagano H, Marubashi S, Wada H, Eguchi H, Takeda Y, Tanemura M, Doki Y, Mori M. Fibrin sealant with PGA felt for prevention of bile leakage after liver resection. Hepatogastroenterology 2012; 59: 2564–2568.
- 5 Coon WW. Iatrogenic splenic injury. Am J Surg, 1990; 159: 585–588.
- 6 Modi P, Rahamim J. Fibrin sealant treatment of splenic injuries during oesophagectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005; 28: 167–168.
- 7 Hildebrand P, Roblick UJ, Schloricke E, Czymek R, Bruch HP, Burk C. The role of organ preservation in the surgical therapy of traumatic spleen injury. Acta Chir Iugosl 2011; 58: 21–25.
- 8 Hsieh TM, Cheng Tsai T, Liang JL, Che Lin C. Non-operative management attempted for selective high grade blunt hepatosplenic trauma is a feasible strategy. World J Emerg Surg, 2014. 9: 51.
- 9 Rees M, Plant G, Wells J, Bygrave S. One hundred and fifty hepatic resections: evolution of technique towards bloodless surgery. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 1526–1529.
- 10 Davidson BR, Burnett S, Javed MS, Seifalian A, Moore D, Doctor N. Experimental study of a novel fibrin sealant for achieving haemostasis following partial hepatectomy. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 790–795.
- 11 Di Carlo I, Toro A. Sealing all of the resection liver surface to maximize the adhesive strength of the carrier-bound fibrin sealant. Arch Surg 2011; 146: 239.
- 12 Kraus TW, Mehrabi A, Schemmer P, Kashfi A, Berberat P, Buchler MW. Scientific evidence for application of topical hemostats, tissue glues, and sealants in hepatobiliary surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 200: 418–427.
- 13 Nakajima Y, Shimamura T, Kamiyama T, Matsushita M, Sato N, Todo S. Control of intraoperative bleeding during liver resection: analysis of a questionnaire sent to 231 Japanese hospitals. Surg Today, 2002; 32: 48–52.
- 14 Mankad PS, Codispoti M. The role of fibrin sealants in hemostasis. Am J Surg 2001; 182(2 Suppl): 21S–28S.
- 15 Chapman, W.C., P.A. Clavien, J. Fung, A. Khanna, and A. Bonham, Effective control of hepatic bleeding with a novel collagen-based composite combined with autologous plasma: results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 2000; 135: 1200–1204; discussion 1205.
- 16 Richardson JD. Changes in the management of injuries to the liver and spleen. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 200: 648–669.
- 17 Matonick JP, Hammond J. Hemostatic efficacy of EVARREST, Fibrin Sealant Patch vs. TachoSil(R) in a heparinized swine spleen incision model. J Invest Surg 2014; 27: 360–365.
- 18 Leonard AS, Giebink GS, Baesl TJ, Krivit W. The overwhelming postsplenectomy sepsis problem. World J Surg 1980; 4: 423–432.
- 19 Scheele J, Gentsch HH, Matteson E. Splenic repair by fibrin tissue adhesive and collagen fleece. Surgery 1984; 95: 6–13.
- 20 Jakob H, Campbell CD, Stemberger A, Wriedt-Lubbe I, Blumel G, Replogle RL. Combined application of heterologous collagen and fibrin sealant for liver injuries. J Surg Res 1984; 36: 571–577.
- 21 Pamecha V, Gurusamy KS, Sharma D, Davidson BR. Techniques for liver parenchymal transection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. HPB (Oxford) 2009; 11: 275–281.
- 22 Ding H, Yuan JQ, Zhou JH, Zheng XY, Ye P, Mao C, Chen Q, Systematic review and meta-analysis of application of fibrin sealant after liver resection. Curr Med Res Opin 2013; 29: 387–394.
- 23 Basu S, Marini CP, Bauman FG, Shirazian D, Damiani P, Robertazzi R, Jacobowitz IJ, Acinapura A, Cunningham JN Jr. Comparative study of biological glues: cryoprecipitate glue, two-component fibrin sealant, and “French” glue. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: 1255–1262.
- 24 Jackson MR. Fibrin sealants in surgical practice: An overview. Am J Surg 2001; 182(2 Suppl): 1S–7S.
- 25 Lacaze L, Le Dem N, Bubenheim M, Tsilividis B, Mezghani J, Schwartz L, Francois A, Ertaud JY, Bagot d'Arc M, Scotte M. Tensile strength of biological fibrin sealants: a comparative study. J Surg Res 2012; 176: 455–459.
- 26 Reece TB, Maxey TS, Kron IL. A prospectus on tissue adhesives. Am J Surg 2001; 182(2 Suppl): 40S–44S.
- 27 Kjaergard HK, Fairbrother JE. Controlled clinical studies of fibrin sealant in cardiothoracic surgery–a review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1996; 10: 727–733.
- 28 Matras H, Chiari FM, Kletter G, Dinges HP. Zur Klebung von Mikrogefäßanastomosen (Eine Experimentelle Stuide). Proceedings, 13th Annual meeting, Dtsch Ges. F. Plast und wiederherstellungschirurgie. Thieme 1977: 357–360.
- 29 Rousou J, Levitsky S, Gonzalez-Lavin L, Cosgrove D, Magilligan D, Weldon C, Hiebert C, Hess P, Joyce L, Bergsland J, et al., Randomized clinical trial of fibrin sealant in patients undergoing resternotomy or reoperation after cardiac operations. A multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989; 97: 194–203.
- 30 Morikawa T, Tissue sealing. Am J Surg 2001; 182(2 Suppl): 29S–35S.
- 31 Spotnitz WD. Commercial fibrin sealants in surgical care. Am J Surg 2001; 182(2 Suppl): 8S–14S.
- 32 Committee, C.M.-c.C.W., A novel collagen-based composite offers effective hemostasis for multiple surgical indications: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Surgery 2001; 129: 445–450.
- 33 Bektas H, Nadalin S, Szabo I, Ploder B, Sharkhawy M, Schmidt J. Hemostatic efficacy of latest-generation fibrin sealant after hepatic resection: a randomized controlled clinical study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2014; 399: 837–847.
- 34 Carless PA, Anthony DM, Henry DA. Systematic review of the use of fibrin sealant to minimize perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Br J Surg, 2002; 89: 695–703.
- 35 Kohno H, Nagasue N, Chang YC, Taniura H, Yamanoi A, Nakamura T. Comparison of topical hemostatic agents in elective hepatic resection: a clinical prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 1992; 16: 966–969; discussion 970.
- 36 Golling M, Schaudt A, Mehrabi A, Mood ZA, Bechstein WO. Clinical application of soft polyglycolic acid felt for hemostasis and repair of a lacerated liver: report of two cases. Surg Today 2008; 38: 188–192.
- 37 Mehrabi A, Fonouni H, Ahmadi R, Schmied BM, Muller SA, Welsch T, Hallscheidt P, Zeier M, Weitz J, Schmidt J. Transplantation of a severely lacerated liver–a case report with review of the literature. Clin Transplant 2009; 23: 321–328.
- 38 Uranus S, Mischinger HJ, Pfeifer J, Kronberger L Jr, Rabl H, Werkgartner G, Steindorfer P, Kraft-Kirz J. Hemostatic methods for the management of spleen and liver injuries. World J Surg 1996; 20: 1107–1111; discussion 1111–2.
- 39 de Boer MT, Boonstra EA, Lisman T, Porte RJ. Role of fibrin sealants in liver surgery. Dig Surg 2012; 29: 54–61.
- 40 Simillis C, Li T, Vaughan J, Becker LA, Davidson BR, Gurusamy KS. A Cochrane systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies aiming to decrease blood loss during liver resection. Int J Surg 2015; 23(Pt A): 128–136.
- 41 Saltz R, Sierra D, Feldman D, Saltz MB, Dimick A, Vasconez LO. Experimental and clinical applications of fibrin glue. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1991; 88: 1005–1015; discussion 1016–1017.
- 42 Erdogan D, de Graaf W, van Gulik TM. Adhesive strength of fibrinogen-coated collagen patch or liquid fibrin sealant in an experimental liver resection model in pigs. Eur Surg Res 2008; 41: 298–302.
- 43 Hayashibe A, Sakamoto K, Shinbo M, Makimoto S, Nakamoto T. New method for prevention of bile leakage after hepatic resection. J Surg Oncol 2006; 94: 57–60.
- 44 Toti L, Attia M, Manzia TM, Lenci I, Gunson B, Buckels JAC, Mirza DF, Mayer AD, Bramhall SR, Wigmore SJ. Reduction in bile leaks following adult split liver transplant using a fibrin-collagen sponge: A pilot study. Digest Liver Dis 2010; 42: 205–209.
- 45 Kobayashi S, Nagano H, Marubashi S, Wada H, Eguchi H, Tanemura M, Sekimoto M, Umeshita K, Doki Y, Mori M. Experience with the use of fibrin sealant plus polyglycolic acid felt at the cut surface of the liver in laparoscopic hepatectomy. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 3590–3596.
- 46 de Boer MT, Klaase JM, Verhoef C, van Dam RM, van Gulik TM, Molenaar IQ, Bosscha K, Dejong CH, Van der Jagt EH, Porte RJ. Fibrin sealant for prevention of resection surface-related complications after liver resection: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2012; 256: 229–234.
- 47 Ollinger R, Mihaljevic AL, Schuhmacher C, Bektas H, Vondran F, Kleine M, Sainz-Barriga M, Weiss S, Knebel P, Pratschke J, Troisi RI. A multicentre, randomized clinical trial comparing the Veriset haemostatic patch with fibrin sealant for the management of bleeding during hepatic surgery. HPB (Oxford) 2013; 15: 548–558.
- 48 Spotnitz WD, Falstrom JK, Rodeheaver GT. The role of sutures and fibrin sealant in wound healing. Surg Clin N Am 1997; 77: 651–669.
- 49 Lawson JH, Lynn KA, Vanmatre RM, Domzalski T, Klemp KF, Ortel TL, Niklason TE, Parker W. Antihuman factor V antibodies after use of relatively pure bovine thrombin. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 1037–1038.