Multiscale regeneration scaffold in vitro and in vivo
Haiping Chen
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an, 343009 China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Shikun Xie
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an, 343009 China
Correspondence to: Shikun Xie; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorYuanmo Yang
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an, 343009 China
Search for more papers by this authorJing Zhang
School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an, 343009 China
Search for more papers by this authorZhuangya Zhang
School of Mechanical Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471003 China
Search for more papers by this authorHaiping Chen
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an, 343009 China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Shikun Xie
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an, 343009 China
Correspondence to: Shikun Xie; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorYuanmo Yang
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an, 343009 China
Search for more papers by this authorJing Zhang
School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an, 343009 China
Search for more papers by this authorZhuangya Zhang
School of Mechanical Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471003 China
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Biocompatible scaffolds play an important role in modulating tissue growth. A gelatin and sodium alginate scaffold with a unique structure produced by a combination of 3-D printing, electrospinning, and vacuum freeze-drying has been developed for tissue engineering. The scaffold is composed of a macrostructure, a honeycomb microporous surface morphology, and nanofibers. This structure meets the design criteria for an ideal tissue engineering scaffold. The scaffold degrades and has low cytotoxicity. The biocompatibility of the scaffold is improved by the favorable cell–matrix interaction; cells attach to the scaffold well and secrete large amounts of extracellular matrix in vitro. Rats with the scaffold implanted survived without signs of complications and the host cells infiltrated the interior of the scaffold. After 2 months in vivo, the scaffold was vascularized and contained collagen fibers. This multiscale regeneration scaffold may be suitable for tissue engineering because of its unique structure, degradation, mechanical properties, and lower cytotoxicity, which support cell infiltration and growth, and promote vascularization and generation of granulation tissue in vivo. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 106B: 1218–1225, 2018.
REFERENCES
- 1 Sengers BG, Taylor M, Please CP, Oreffo ROC. Computational modelling of cell spreading and tissue regeneration in porous scaffolds. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 1926–1940.
- 2 Chen FP. Controllable degradation and cytotoxicity of calcium polyphosphate bone scaffold. Chinese J Inorg Chem 2008; 24: 88–92.
- 3 Liu WJ. The fabrication and fractal study of poly(L-lactic acid) gradient scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Beijing Univ Chem Technol 2006; 33: 56–60.
- 4 Chen SSA, Yang QB, Shen XYB, Tan ZQB, Peng LLA. PBS/PCL scaffold for tissue engineering prepared by solvent casting/particulate leaching. J Donghua Univ 2009; 35: 391–395.
- 5 Xiong Z, Yan Y, Wang S, Zhang R, Zhang C. Fabrication of porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering via low-temperature deposition. Scr Mater 2002; 46: 771–776.
- 6
Liu DL,
Liu YY,
Hu QX,
You F,
Zhang HG. Study on processing and model building of composite structure forming for 3-D regenerative bone scaffold. Appl Mech Mater 2010; 33: 518–522.
10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.33.518 Google Scholar
- 7 Moroni L, Hendriks JA, Schotel R, de Wijn JR, van Blitterswijk CA. Design of biphasic polymeric 3-dimensional fiber deposited scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng 2007; 13: 361–371.
- 8 Moroni L, Wijn JRDe, Blitterswijk CAVan. 3D fiber-deposited scaffolds for tissue engineering: Influence of pores geometry and architecture on dynamic mechanical properties. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 974–985.
- 9 Chang R, Nam J, Sun W. Direct cell writing of 3D microorgan for in vitro pharmacokinetic model. Tissue Eng C Methods 2008; 14: 157–166.
- 10 Chang CC, Boland ED, Williams SK, Hoying JB. Direct-write bioprinting three-dimensional biohybrid systems for future regenerative therapies. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2011; 98: 160–170.
- 11 Kraan PM, Van Der , Buma P, Kuppevelt TVan, Berg WB Van Den. Interaction of chondrocytes, extracellular matrix and growth factors: Relevance for articular cartilage tissue engineering. Osteoarthr Cartil 2002; 10: 631–637.
- 12 Correia C. Chitosan scaffolds containing hyaluronic acid for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng C Methods 2011; 17: 717–730.
- 13 Wei ST. Cartilage repair using hyaluronan hydrogel-encapsulated human embryonic stem cell-derived chondrogenic cells. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 6968–6980.
- 14 Rampichov M. Fibrin/hyaluronic acid composite hydrogels as appropriate scaffolds for in vivo artificial cartilage implantation. J Asaio 2010; 56: 563–568.
- 15 Masahiro K. Chondrocyte distribution and cartilage regeneration in silk fibroin sponge. Biomed Mater Eng 2011; 21: 53–61.
- 16 Bernstein A. Microporous calcium phosphate ceramics as tissue engineering scaffolds for the repair of osteochondral defects: Histological results. Acta Biomater 2013; 9: 7490–7505 .
- 17 Seyednejad H, Gawlitta D, Kuiper RV, Bruin AD, Nostrum CF. In vivo biocompatibility and biodegradation adation of 3D-printed porous scaffolds based on a hydroxyl-functionalized poly (e-caprolactone). Biomaterials 2012; 33: 4309–4318.
- 18 Shim JH, Lee JS, Kim JY, Cho DW. Bioprinting of a mechanically enhanced three-dimensional dual cell-laden construct for osteochondral tissue engineering using a multi-head tissue/organ building system. J Micromechanics Microengineering 2012; 22: 85014–85024(11).
- 19 Butscher A. Printability of calcium phosphate powders for three-dimensional printing of tissue engineering scaffolds. Acta Biomater 2012; 8: 373–385.
- 20 Filov E. A cell-free nanofiber composite scaffold regenerated osteochondral defects in miniature pigs. Int J Pharm 2013; 447: 139–149.
- 21 Wanxun Y, Fang Y, Yining W, Both SK, Jansen JA. In vivo bone generation via the endochondral pathway on three-dimensional electrospun fibers. Acta Biomater 2013; 9: 4505–4512.
- 22 Grey CP, Newton ST, Bowlin GL, Haas TW, Simpson DG. Gradient fiber electrospinning of layered scaffolds using controlled transitions in fiber diameter. Biomaterials 2013; 34: 4993–5006.
- 23 Shabani I, Haddadi-Asl V, Seyedjafari E, Soleimani M. Cellular infiltration on nanofibrous scaffolds using a modified electrospinning technique. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2012; 423: 50–54.
- 24 Chen BL, Wang DA. Cytological effect of tissue engineering materials with cell compatibility. Chinese J Clin Rehabil 2006; 10: 225–227.
- 25 Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Johnstone H, Affrossman S, Curtis ASG. In vitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 2945–2954.
- 26 Berry CC, Campbell G, Spadiccino A, Robertson M, Curtis ASG. The influence of microscale topography on fibroblast attachment and motility. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 5781–5788.
- 27 Tocce EJ. The influence of biomimetic topographical features and the extracellular matrix peptide RGD on human corneal epithelial contact guidance. Acta Biomater 2012; 9: 5040–5051.
- 28 Massumi M. The effect of topography on differentiation fates of matrigel-coated mouse embryonic stem cells cultured on PLGA nanofibrous scaffolds. Tissue Eng A 2012; 18: 609–620.
- 29 Tan QY, Wang HB, Yang YZ, Zou XB, Yang L. Effects of substrate stiffness on the migration of hepatic and hepatoma carcinoma cells. Yiyong Shengwu Lixue/J Med Biomech 2011; 26: 566–573.
- 30 Zoldan J, Karagiannis ED, Lee CY. The influence of scaffold elasticity on germ layer specification of human embryonic stem cells. Biomaterials 2011; 32: 9612–9621.
- 31 Story BJ, Wagner WR, Gaisser DM, Cook SD, Rustdawicki AM. In vivo performance of a modified CSTi dental implant coating. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 749–757.
- 32 Kellner K. Determination of oxygen gradients in engineered tissue using a fluorescent sensor. Biotechnol Bioeng 2002; 80: 73–83.
- 33 Radisic M. Oxygen gradients correlate with cell density and cell viability in engineered cardiac tissue. Biotechnol Bioeng 2006; 93: 332–343.
- 34 Malda J, Klein TJ, Upton Z. The roles of hypoxia in the in vitro engineering of tissues. Tissue Eng 2007; 13: 2153–2162.
- 35 Elias V. Hypoxia in static and dynamic 3D culture systems for tissue engineering of bone. Tissue Eng A 2008; 14: 1331–1340.
- 36 Lewis MC, Macarthur BD, Malda J, Pettet G, Please CP. Heterogeneous proliferation within engineered cartilaginous tissue: The role of oxygen tension. Biotechnol Bioeng 2005; 91: 607–615.
- 37 J M, DE M, J T, van Blitterswijk CA, J R. Cartilage tissue engineering: Controversy in the effect of oxygen. Crit Rev Biotechnol 2003; 23: 175–194.
- 38 Fedorovich NE, Kuipers E, Gawlitta D, Dhert WJ, Alblas J. Scaffold porosity and oxygenation of printed hydrogel constructs affect functionality of embedded osteogenic progenitors. Tissue Eng A 2011; 17: 2473–2486.
- 39 Landers R, Hübner U, Schmelzeisen R, Mülhaupt R. Rapid prototyping of scaffolds derived from thermoreversible hydrogels and tailored for applications in tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 4437–4447.
- 40 Melchels FPW, Domingos MAN, Klein TJ, Malda J, Bartolo PJ. Additive manufacturing of tissues and organs. Prog Polym Sci 2012; 37: 1079–1104.
- 41 Tasoglu S, Demirci U. Bioprinting for stem cell research. Trends Biotechnol 2013; 31: 10–19.
- 42 Ozbolat IT, Yu Y. Bioprinting toward organ fabrication: Challenges and future trends. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2013; 60: 691–699.
- 43 Asran A, Henning S, Michler G. Polyvinyl alcohol-collagen-hydroxyapatite biocomposite nanofiber scaffolds: Mimicking the key features of natural bone at the nanoscale level. Polymer 2010; 51: 868–876.
- 44 Billiet T, Vandenhaute M, Schelfhout J, Van Vlierberghe S, Dubruel P. A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2012; 33: 6020–6041.
- 45 Xu MG, Wang XH, Yan YN, Yao R, Ge YK. An cell-assembly derived physiological 3D model of the metabolic syndrome, based on adipose-derived stromal cells and a gelatin/alginate/fibrinogen matrix. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 3868–3877.
- 46 Chen HP, Liu YY, Hu QX. A novel bioactive membrane by cell electrospinning. Exp Cell Res 2015; 338: 261–266.