A multilayered scaffold for regeneration of smooth muscle and connective tissue layers
Carly M. Garrison
Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAnya Singh-Varma
Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAlexandra K. Pastino
New Jersey Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJoseph A. M. Steele
New Jersey Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJoachim Kohn
New Jersey Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
Search for more papers by this authorN. Sanjeeva Murthy
New Jersey Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jean E. Schwarzbauer
Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
Correspondence
Jean E. Schwarzbauer, Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCarly M. Garrison
Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAnya Singh-Varma
Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAlexandra K. Pastino
New Jersey Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJoseph A. M. Steele
New Jersey Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJoachim Kohn
New Jersey Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
Search for more papers by this authorN. Sanjeeva Murthy
New Jersey Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jean E. Schwarzbauer
Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
Correspondence
Jean E. Schwarzbauer, Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorFunding information: National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Grant/Award Number: R01 AR 073236; National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, Grant/Award Number: P4 EB001046; National Institute of General Medical Sciences, Grant/Award Number: NIH T32 GM007388; New Jersey Commission on Cancer Research (NJCCR), Grant/Award Number: DFHS18PPC041
Abstract
Tissue regeneration often requires recruitment of different cell types and rebuilding of two or more tissue layers to restore function. Here, we describe the creation of a novel multilayered scaffold with distinct fiber organizations—aligned to unaligned and dense to porous—to template common architectures found in adjacent tissue layers. Electrospun scaffolds were fabricated using a biodegradable, tyrosine-derived terpolymer, yielding densely-packed, aligned fibers that transition into randomly-oriented fibers of increasing diameter and porosity. We demonstrate that differently-oriented scaffold fibers direct cell and extracellular matrix (ECM) organization, and that scaffold fibers and ECM protein networks are maintained after decellularization. Smooth muscle and connective tissue layers are frequently adjacent in vivo; we show that within a single scaffold, the architecture supports alignment of contractile smooth muscle cells and deposition by fibroblasts of a meshwork of ECM fibrils. We rolled a flat scaffold into a tubular construct and, after culture, showed cell viability, orientation, and tissue-specific protein expression in the tube were similar to the flat-sheet scaffold. This scaffold design not only has translational potential for reparation of flat and tubular tissue layers but can also be customized for alternative applications by introducing two or more cell types in different combinations.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
jbma37058-sup-0001-Figures.docxWord 2007 document , 30.5 MB | Supplemental Figure S1 Fiber organization and orientation on opposite sides of the multilayered scaffold. (A) Representative fluorescence confocal maximum intensity projections of the aligned and unaligned sides of the E1001(1k) scaffold. Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Quantification of the scaffold fiber orientations by Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) analysis of confocal slices is shown. Images were captured at 0, 8, and 26 μm into the scaffold starting from the aligned side (AL, left) and 0, 10, and 26 μm in starting from the unaligned side (UN, right). Peaks between 45 and 90° for AL 0 and AL 8 μm confocal planes indicate that the fibers are oriented in the same direction. The lack of major peaks in the plots taken from the unaligned side as well as for AL 26 μm show that the fibers in these planes and all UN planes have no preferred orientation. Supplemental Figure S2. Cell organization on different sides of the multilayered scaffold. NIH 3T3 fibroblasts were grown on either the aligned (top) or unaligned (bottom) side of scaffolds. Cells were fixed and stained with DAPI and Texas-Red phalloidin, to detect nuclei (blue) and actin (red), respectively. Horizontal actin filament orientations on the aligned side indicate cell alignment with the scaffold fibers. Scale bar = 50 μm. Supplemental Figure S3. Cell infiltration into the unaligned and aligned sides of a multilayered electrospun scaffold. The depth of fibroblast infiltration into each side of the multilayered scaffold was visualized by the localization of DAPI staining (blue) in shaded-volume reconstructions showing orthogonal views. Dimensions are indicated on the right. The scaffold is green. Figure S4: Decellularization of the electrospun scaffold. NIH 3T3 fibroblasts (A and B) or WKY3M22 smooth muscle cells (C) were cultured on either the aligned (A and C) or unaligned (B) side of the E1001(1k) scaffold for 7 days. The scaffolds were decellularized, fixed and stained with R457 anti-fibronectin antiserum. Decellularized cultures of NIH 3T3 and WKY3M22 rat aortic SMCs on the scaffold showed intact FN fibrils oriented in similar directions to scaffold fibers. Representative reflectance (Scaffold) and fluorescence (FN) images of the same fields of view are shown. Scale bar = 50 μm. (D) Orientation of the decellularized FN on the scaffolds was quantified by FFT analysis as in Figure 2. FFT analyses confirmed the orientations of the FN matrix fibrils were similar to the orientation of the underlying scaffold fibers. Supplemental Figure S5. Delivery of TGF-β1 to smooth muscle cells through an agarose droplet. (A) Schematic depicting experimental setup. (B) A 1% agarose droplet containing 2 ng TGF-β1 was pipetted onto the unaligned side of a transwell scaffold and allowed to solidify. Total release of TGF-β1 into the culture medium will yield a concentration of 2 ng/ml. WKY3M22 SMCs were seeded onto the opposing aligned side of the scaffold and cells were grown for 5 days before fixing and staining with an antibody specific to α-SMA. The fold-change in mean fluorescence intensities of α-SMA in cells with and without TGF-β1 are shown on the images (mean ± S.E.) (n = 3). Scale bar = 50 μm. Note that SMCs grown with the TGF-β1 droplet had prominent α-SMA stress fibers aligned with the underlying scaffold fibers. Mean fluorescence intensity averaged 1.4 ± 0.1-fold higher than control (p < 0.05). This increase was not significantly different (p = 0.37) from the increase in α-SMA intensity when TGF-β1 was added directly to the media. Supplemental Figure S6. Formation and evaluation of cell growth on a tubular scaffold. (a) Images depicting the rolled scaffold with plastic cylinders to hold the shape during culture (top) and maintenance of a tubular shape after cylinder removal (bottom). (b) 4 x 104 cells/cm2 were seeded onto the aligned side of a scaffold sheet and allowed to grow in complete medium for the indicated times. Cells were fixed and stained with DAPI and Texas-Red phalloidin to detect nuclei and actin, respectively. The scaffold fibers were visualized by confocal microscopy in reflectance mode. Difference in cell densities at 8 hr and 7 days demonstrates that cells grew to confluence in the tubular scaffold culture. Scale bar = 50 μm. Supplemental Figure S7. SEM images of an electrospun tube. (A) Picture of an electrospun bilayer tube that was prepared by depositing, on either a 4 mm or 6 mm diameter rod, a 10% polymer solution at high speed of rotation for 15 min to obtain an aligned layer followed by low speed of rotation for additional 15 min to obtain an unaligned layer. Rods were dipcoated with 100 kDa PEG dissolved in water and dried before electrospinning; this way, the electrospun tube was able to slide off the rods through immersion in water. Scale bar = 1 cm. (B) SEM images showing the fiber orientation for the aligned (inside) and unaligned (outside) scaffold sides of a 6 mm diameter tube. The fibers are ~1 μm in diameter and are densely packed on the aligned side and have larger pores on the unaligned side. Scale bar = 100 μm. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- 1Zderic SA, Chacko S. Alterations in the contractile phenotype of the bladder: lessons for understanding physiological and pathological remodeling of smooth muscle. J Cell Mol Med. 2012; 16(2): 203-217.
- 2Heidari M, Mandato CA, Lehoux S. Vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic modulation and the extracellular matrix. Artery Res. 2019; 9(C): 14-18.
- 3Li WJ, Laurencin CT, Caterson EJ, Tuan RS, Ko FK. Electrospun nanofibrous structure: a novel scaffold for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002; 60(4): 613-621.
- 4Ameer JM, Pr AK, Kasoju N. Strategies to tune electrospun scaffold porosity for effective cell response in tissue engineering. J Funct Biomater. 2019; 10(3): 30.
- 5Sill TJ, von Recum HA. Electrospinning: applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2008; 29(13): 1989-2006.
- 6Ardila DC, Tamimi E, Doetschman T, Wagner WR, Vande Geest JP. Modulating smooth muscle cell response by the release of TGFβ2 from tubular scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering. J Control Release. 2019; 299: 44-52.
- 7Goyal R, Vega ME, Pastino AK, et al. Development of hybrid scaffolds with natural extracellular matrix deposited within synthetic polymeric fibers. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017; 105(8): 2162-2170.
- 8Gao X, Zhang X, Song J, et al. Osteoinductive peptide-functionalized nanofibers with highly ordered structure as biomimetic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015; 10: 7109-7128.
- 9Kidoaki S, Kwon IK, Matsuda T. Mesoscopic spatial designs of nano- and microfiber meshes for tissue-engineering matrix and scaffold based on newly devised multilayering and mixing electrospinning techniques. Biomaterials. 2005; 26(1): 37-46.
- 10Mahjour SB, Sefat F, Polunin Y, Wang L, Wang H. Improved cell infiltration of electrospun nanofiber mats for layered tissue constructs. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016; 104(6): 1479-1488.
- 11Scaffaro R, Lopresti F, Maio A, Sutera F, Botta L. Development of polymeric functionally graded scaffolds: a brief review. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2017; 15(2): e107-e121.
- 12McCullen SD, Autefage H, Callanan A, Gentleman E, Stevens MM. Anisotropic fibrous scaffolds for articular cartilage regeneration. Tissue Engineering. Part A. 2012; 18(19–20): 2073-2083.
- 13Steele JA, McCullen SD, Callanan A, et al. Combinatorial scaffold morphologies for zonal articular cartilage engineering. Acta Biomater. 2014; 10(5): 2065-2075.
- 14Kim J, Magno MH, Alvarez P, Darr A, Kohn J, Hollinger JO. Osteogenic differentiation of pre-osteoblasts on biomimetic tyrosine-derived polycarbonate scaffolds. Biomacromolecules. 2011; 12(10): 3520-3527.
- 15Merolli A, Fung S, Murthy NS, et al. "Ruffled border" formation on a CaP-free substrate: A first step towards osteoclast-recruiting bone-grafts materials able to re-establish bone turn-over. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2018; 29(4): 38.
- 16Magno MHR, Kim J, Srinivasan A, et al. Synthesis, degradation and biocompatibility of tyrosine-derived polycarbonate scaffolds. J Mater Chem. 2010; 20: 8885-8893.
- 17Kim J, Magno MH, Ortiz O, et al. Next-generation resorbable polymer scaffolds with surface-precipitated calcium phosphate coatings. Regen Biomater. 2015; 2(1): 1-8.
- 18Yu C, Kohn J. Tyrosine-PEG-derived poly(ether carbonate)s as new biomaterials. Part I: synthesis and evaluation. Biomaterials. 1999; 20(3): 253-264.
- 19Murthy NS, Wang W, Kohn J. Separation in copolymers of hydrophilic PEG blocks and hydrophobic tyrosine-derived segments using simultaneous SAXS/WAXS/DSC. Polymer. 2010; 51: 3978-3988.
- 20Graves DC, Yablonka-Reuveni Z. Vascular smooth muscle cells spontaneously adopt a skeletal muscle phenotype: a unique Myf5(-)/MyoD(+) myogenic program. J Histochem Cytochem. 2000; 48(9): 1173-1193.
- 21Harris GM, Raitman I, Schwarzbauer JE. Cell-derived decellularized extracellular matrices. Methods Cell Biol. 2018; 143: 97-114.
- 22Corbett SA, Schwarzbauer JE. Requirements for alpha(5)beta(1) integrin-mediated retraction of fibronectin-fibrin matrices. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274(30): 20943-20948.
- 23Midwood KS, Schwarzbauer JE. Tenascin-C modulates matrix contraction via focal adhesion kinase- and rho-mediated signaling pathways. Mol Biol Cell. 2002; 13(10): 3601-3613.
- 24Aguirre KM, McCormick RJ, Schwarzbauer JE. Fibronectin self-association is mediated by complementary sites within the amino-terminal one-third of the molecule. J Biol Chem. 1994; 269(45): 27863-27868.
- 25Sechler JL, Takada Y, Schwarzbauer JE. Altered rate of fibronectin matrix assembly by deletion of the first type III repeats. J Cell Biol. 1996; 134(2): 573-583.
- 26Sechler JL, Schwarzbauer JE. Coordinated regulation of fibronectin fibril assembly and actin stress fiber formation. Cell Adhes Commun. 1997; 4(6): 413-424.
- 27Ayres CE, Jha BS, Meredith H, et al. Measuring fiber alignment in electrospun scaffolds: a user's guide to the 2D fast Fourier transform approach. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2008; 19(5): 603-621.
- 28Singh S, Bandini SB, Donnelly PE, Schwartz J, Schwarzbauer JE. A cell-assembled, spatially aligned extracellular matrix to promote directed tissue development. J Mater Chem B. 2014; 2(11): 1449-1453.
- 29Wu J, Hong Y. Enhancing cell infiltration of electrospun fibrous scaffolds in tissue regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2016; 1(1): 56-64.
- 30Ueki N, Sobue K, Kanda K, Hada T, Higashino K. Expression of high and low molecular weight caldesmons during phenotypic modulation of smooth muscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987; 84(24): 9049-9053.
- 31Sobue K, Hayashi K, Nishida W. Expressional regulation of smooth muscle cell-specific genes in association with phenotypic modulation. Mol Cell Biochem. 1999; 190(1–2): 105-118.
- 32Rensen SS, Doevendans PA, van Eys GJ. Regulation and characteristics of vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic diversity. Neth Heart J. 2007; 15(3): 100-108.
- 33Webb RC. Smooth muscle contraction and relaxation. Adv Physiol Educ. 2003; 27(1–4): 201-206.
- 34Shen JY, Chan-Park MB, He B, et al. Three-dimensional microchannels in biodegradable polymeric films for control orientation and phenotype of vascular smooth muscle cells. Tissue Eng. 2006; 12(8): 2229-2240.
- 35Agrawal A, Lee BH, Irvine SA, et al. Smooth muscle cell alignment and phenotype control by melt spun polycaprolactone fibers for seeding of tissue engineered blood vessels. Int J Biomater. 2015; 2015:434876.
- 36Han DG, Ahn CB, Lee J, et al. Optimization of electrospun poly(caprolactone) fiber diameter for vascular scaffolds to maximize smooth muscle cell infiltration and phenotype modulation. Polymers. 2019; 11(4): 693.
- 37Katsuda S, Boyd HC, Fligner C, Ross R, Gown AM. Human atherosclerosis. III. Immunocytochemical analysis of the cell composition of lesions of young adults. Am J Pathol. 1992; 140(4): 907-914.
- 38Owens GK, Kumar MS, Wamhoff BR. Molecular regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation in development and disease. Physiol Rev. 2004; 84(3): 767-801.
- 39Wamhoff BR, Hoofnagle MH, Burns A, Sinha S, McDonald OG, Owens GK. A G/C element mediates repression of the SM22alpha promoter within phenotypically modulated smooth muscle cells in experimental atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2004; 95(10): 981-988.
- 40Hautmann MB, Madsen CS, Owens GK. A transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta) control element drives TGFbeta-induced stimulation of smooth muscle alpha-actin gene expression in concert with two CArG elements. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272(16): 10948-10956.
- 41Deaton RA, Su C, Valencia TG, Grant SR. Transforming growth factor-beta1-induced expression of smooth muscle marker genes involves activation of PKN and p38 MAPK. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280(35): 31172-31181.
- 42Beamish JA, He P, Kottke-Marchant K, Marchant RE. Molecular regulation of contractile smooth muscle cell phenotype: implications for vascular tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2010; 16(5): 467-491.
- 43Oh E, Pierschbacher M, Ruoslahti E. Deposition of plasma fibronectin in tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981; 78(5): 3218-3221.
- 44Moretti FA, Chauhan AK, Iaconcig A, Porro F, Baralle FE, Muro AF. A major fraction of fibronectin present in the extracellular matrix of tissues is plasma-derived. J Biol Chem. 2007; 282(38): 28057-28062.
- 45Kumra H, Sabatier L, Hassan A, et al. Roles of fibronectin isoforms in neonatal vascular development and matrix integrity. PLoS Biol. 2018; 16(7):e2004812.
- 46Hedin U, Bottger BA, Forsberg E, Johansson S, Thyberg J. Diverse effects of fibronectin and laminin on phenotypic properties of cultured arterial smooth muscle cells. J Cell Biol. 1988; 107(1): 307-319.
- 47Jaslove JM, Nelson CM. Smooth muscle: a stiff sculptor of epithelial shapes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018; 373(1759):20170318.
- 48Velling T, Risteli J, Wennerberg K, Mosher DF, Johansson S. Polymerization of type I and III collagens is dependent on fibronectin and enhanced by integrins alpha 11beta 1 and alpha 2beta 1. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277(40): 37377-37381.
- 49Kinsey R, Williamson MR, Chaudhry S, et al. Fibrillin-1 microfibril deposition is dependent on fibronectin assembly. J Cell Sci. 2008; 121(Pt 16): 2696-2704.
- 50Miller CG, Pozzi A, Zent R, Schwarzbauer JE. Effects of high glucose on integrin activity and fibronectin matrix assembly by mesangial cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2014; 25(16): 2342-2350.
- 51Zhang X, Wang X, Keshav V, et al. Dynamic culture conditions to generate silk-based tissue-engineered vascular grafts. Biomaterials. 2009; 30(19): 3213-3223.
- 52Ye L, Cao J, Chen L, et al. The fabrication of double layer tubular vascular tissue engineering scaffold via coaxial electrospinning and its 3D cell coculture. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015; 103(12): 3863-3871.
- 53Hussain A, Collins G, Yip D, Cho CH. Functional 3-D cardiac co-culture model using bioactive chitosan nanofiber scaffolds. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2013; 110(2): 637-647.
- 54Lee B, Shafiq M, Jung Y, Park JC, Kim SH. Characterization and preparation of bio-tubular scaffolds for fabricating artificial vascular grafts by combining electrospinning and a co-culture system. Macromol Res. 2016; 24: 131-142.
- 55Panseri S, Cunha C, Lowery J, et al. Electrospun micro- and nanofiber tubes for functional nervous regeneration in sciatic nerve transections. BMC Biotechnol. 2008; 8: 39.
- 56Evrova O, Houska J, Welti M, et al. Bioactive, elastic, and biodegradable emulsion electrospun DegraPol tube delivering PDGF-BB for tendon rupture repair. Macromol Biosci. 2016; 16(7): 1048-1063.
- 57Wu T, Zhang J, Wang Y, et al. Fabrication and preliminary study of a biomimetic tri-layer tubular graft based on fibers and fiber yarns for vascular tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018; 82: 121-129.
- 58Bye FJ, Bissoli J, Black JL, et al. Development of a bilayer and trilayer nanofibrous/microfibrous scaffolds for regenerative medicine. Biomater Sci. 2013; 1: 942-951.
- 59Wang Y, Shi H, Qiao J, et al. Electrospun tubular scaffold with circumferentially aligned nanofibers for regulating smooth muscle cell growth. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014; 6(4): 2958-2962.
- 60Villalona GA, Udelsman B, Duncan DR, et al. Cell-seeding techniques in vascular tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2010; 16(3): 341-350.
- 61Zakharchenko S, Sperling E, Ionov L. Fully biodegradable self-rolled polymer tubes: a candidate for tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomacromolecules. 2011; 12(6): 2211-2215.
- 62Teshima TF, Nakashima H, Ueno Y, Sasaki S, Henderson CS, Tsukada S. Cell assembly in self-foldable multi-layered soft micro-rolls. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):17376.