Polyampholyte- and nanosilicate-based soft bionanocomposites with tailorable mechanical and cell adhesion properties
Minkle Jain
School of Materials Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 1-1 Asahidai, Nomi, Ishikawa, 923-1292 Japan
Search for more papers by this authorKazuaki Matsumura
School of Materials Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 1-1 Asahidai, Nomi, Ishikawa, 923-1292 Japan
Search for more papers by this authorMinkle Jain
School of Materials Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 1-1 Asahidai, Nomi, Ishikawa, 923-1292 Japan
Search for more papers by this authorKazuaki Matsumura
School of Materials Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 1-1 Asahidai, Nomi, Ishikawa, 923-1292 Japan
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Engineered tissues are excellent substitutes for treating organ failure associated with disease, injury, and degeneration. Designing new biomaterials with controlled release profiles, good mechanical properties, and cell adhesion characteristics can be useful for the formation of specific functional tissues. Here, we report the formulation of nanocomposite hydrogels based on carboxylated poly-l-lysine and synthetic clay laponite XLG in which four-arm polyethylene glycol with N-hydroxy succinimide ester (PEG-NHS) was used as the chemical crosslinker. Interestingly, the degradation of this gel could be adjusted from a few days to a few months. Incorporation of laponite XLG resulted in the formation of mechanically tough hydrogels and conferred cytocompatibility. The mechanical properties of the nanocomposite could be modulated by changing the crosslinking density and laponite concentration. The feasibility of using this system for cellular therapies was investigated by evaluating cell adhesion on the nanocomposite surface. Thus, these nanocomposites can serve as scaffolds with tunable mechanical and degradation properties that also provide structural integrity to tissue constructs. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 104A: 1379–1386, 2016.
REFERENCES
- 1 Nicodemus GD, Bryant SJ. Cell encapsulation in biodegradable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng B 2008; 14: 140–165.
- 2 Lee LY, Mooney DJ. Hydrogels for tissue engineering. Chem Rev 2001; 101: 1869–1880.
- 3 Peppas NA, Hilt JZ, Khademhosseini A, Langer R. Hydrogels in biology and medicine: From molecular principles to bionanotechnology. Adv Matter 2006; 18: 1345–1360.
- 4 Martens P, Metters AT, Anseth KS, Bowman CN. A generalized bulk-degradation model for hydrogel networks formed from multivinyl cross-linking molecules. J Phys Chem B 2001; 105: 5131–5138.
- 5 Lutolf MP, Hubbell JA. Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol 2005; 23: 47–55.
- 6 Jain M, Rajan R, Hyon SH, Matsumura K. Hydrogelation of dextran-based polyampholytes with cryoprotective properties via click chemistry. Biomater Sci 2014; 2: 308–317.
- 7 Nguyen MK, Lee DS. Injectable biodegradable hydrogels. Macromol Biosci 2010; 10: 563–579.
- 8 Jeong B, Bae YH, Lee DS, Kim SW. Biodegradable block copolymers as injectable drug-delivery systems. Nature 1997; 388: 860–862.
- 9 Mano F. Stimuli-responsive polymeric systems for biomedical applications. Adv Eng Mater 2008; 10: 515–527.
- 10 Petka WA, Hardin JL, Mcgrath KP, Wirtz D, Tirrell DA. Reversible hydrogels from self-assembling artificial proteins. Science 1998; 281: 389–392.
- 11 Chung HJ, Park TG. Self-assembled and nanostructured hydrogels for drug delivery and tissue engineering. Nano Today 2009; 4: 429–437.
- 12 Lu HD, Soranno DE, Rodell CB, Kim IL, Burdick JA. Secondary photocrosslinking of injectable shear-thinning dock-and-lock hydrogels. Adv Healthcare Mater 2013; 2: 1028–1036.
- 13 Bryant SJ, Anseth KS. Hydrogel properties influence ECM production by chondrocytes photoencapsulated in poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 59: 63–72.
- 14 Zustiak SP, Leach JB. Hydrolytically degradable poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel scaffolds with tunable degradation and mechanical properties. Biomacromolecules 2010; 10: 1348–1357.
- 15 Lu SX, Anseth KS. Release behavior of high molecular weight solutes from poly(ethylene glycol)-based degradable networks. Macromolecules 2000; 33: 2509–2515.
- 16 Mason MN, Metters AT, Bowman CN, Anseth KS. Predicting controlled-release behavior of degradable PLA-b-PEG-b-PLA hydrogels. Macromolecules 2001; 34: 4630–4635.
- 17 Metters AT, Anseth KS, Bowman CN. Fundamental studies of a novel, biodegradable PEG-b-PLA hydrogel. Polymer 2000; 41: 3993–4004.
- 18 Sun JY, Zhao X, Illeperuma WR, Chaudhuri O, Oh KH, Mooney DJ, Vlassak JJ, Suo Z. Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels. Nature 2012; 489: 133–136.
- 19 Darnell MC, Sun JY, Mehta M, Johnson C, Arany PR, Suo Z, Mooney DJ. Performance and biocompatibility of extremely tough alginate/polyacrylamide hydrogels. Biomaterials 2013; 34: 8042–8048.
- 20 Gaharwar AK, Schexnailder PJ, Kline BP, Schmidt G. Assessment of using laponite cross-linked poly(ethylene oxide) for controlled cell adhesion and mineralization. Acta Biomater 2011; 7: 568–577.
- 21 Gaharwar AK, Rivera CP, Wu CJ, Schmidt G. Transparent, elastomeric and tough hydrogels from poly(ethylene glycol) and silicate nanoparticles. Acta Biomater 2011; 7: 4139–4148.
- 22 Haraguchi K. Nanocomposite hydrogels. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 2007; 11: 47–54.
- 23 Chang CW, Spreeuwel A, Zhang C, Varghese S. PEG/clay nanocomposite hydrogel: A mechanically robust tissue engineering scaffold. Soft Matter 2010; 6: 5157–5164.
- 24 Xia Y. Nanomaterials at work in biomedical research. Nat Mater 2008; 7: 758–760.
- 25 Cingolani R. The road ahead. Nat Nanotechnol 2013; 8: 792–793.
- 26 Zreiqat H, Howlett C, Zannettino A, Evans P, Tanzil GS, Knabe C, Shakibaei M. Mechanisms of magnesium-stimulated adhesion of osteoblastic cells to commonly used orthopaedic implants. J Biomed Mater Res A 2002; 62: 175–184.
- 27 Carrow JK, Gaharwar AK. Bioinspired polymeric nanocomposites for regenerative medicine. Macromol Chem Phys 2015; 216: 248–264.
- 28 Krsko P, Libera M. Biointeractive hydrogels. Mater Today 2005; 8: 36–44.
- 29 Lee SH, Miller JS, Moon JJ, West JL. Proteolytically degradable hydrogels with a fluorogenic substrate for studies of cellular proteolytic activity and migration. Biotechnol Prog 2005; 21: 1736–1741.
- 30 Mann BK, Gobin AS, Tsai AT, Schmedlen RH, West JL. Smooth muscle cell growth in photopolymerized hydrogels with cell adhesive and proteolytically degradable domains: Synthetic ECM analogs for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 3045–3051.
- 31 Nie T, Baldwin A, Yamaguchi N, Kiick KL. Production of heparin-functionalized hydrogels for the development of responsive and controlled growth factor delivery systems. J Controlled Release 2007; 122: 287–296.
- 32 Leach JB, Schmidt CE. Characterization of protein release from photocrosslinkable hyaluronic acid-polyethylene glycol hydrogel tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 125–135.
- 33 Bell CL, Peppas NA. Water, solute and protein diffusion in physiologically responsive hydrogels of poly(methacrylic acid-gethylene glycol). Biomaterials 1996; 17: 1203–1218.
- 34 Matsumura K, Hyon SH. Polyampholytes as low toxic efficient cryoprotective agents with antifreeze protein properties. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 4842–4849.
- 35 Rajan R, Jain M, Matsumura K. Cryoprotective properties of completely synthetic polyampholytes via reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization and the effects of hydrophobicity. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2013; 24: 1767–1780.
- 36 Rajan R, Matsumura K. Preparation of novel synthetic cryoprotectants. Cryobol Cryotechnol 2014; 60: 99–103.
- 37 Rajan R, Matsumura K. A zwitterionic polymer as a novel inhibitor of protein aggregation. J Mater Chem B 2015; 3: 5683–5689.
- 38 Watanabe H, Kohaya N, Kamoshita M, Fujikawa K, Matsumura K, Hyon SH, Ito J, Kashiwazaki N. Efficient production of live offspring from mouse oocytes vitrified with a novel cryoprotective agent, carboxylated ε-poly-L-lysine. PLoS One 2013; 8: e83613.
- 39 Maehara M, Sato M, Watanabe M, Matsunari H, Kokubo M, Kanai T, Sato M, Matsumura K, Hyon SH, Yokoyama M, Mochida J, Nagashima H. Development of a novel vitrification method for chondrocyte sheets. BMC Biotechnol 2013; 13: 58.
- 40 Jin OS, Lee JH, Shin YC, Lee EJ, Lee JJ, Matsumura K, Hyon SH, Han DW. Cryoprotection of fibroblasts by carboxylated poly-L-lysine upon repeated freeze/thaw cycles. Cryoletters 22013; 34: 396–403.
- 41 Matsumra K, Hayashi F, Nagashima T, Hyon SH. Long-term cryopreservation of human mesenchymal stem cells using carboxylated poly-L-lysine without the addition of proteins or dimethyl sulfoxide. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2013; 24: 1484–1497.
- 42 Matsumura K, Bae JY, Kim HH, Hyon SH. Effective vitrification of human induced pluripotent stem cells using carboxylated ε-poly-L-lysine. Cryobiology 2011; 63: 76–83.
- 43 Matsumura K, Bae JY, Hyon SH. Large scale vitrification for the preservation of human induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells using carboxylated poly-L-lysine. Low Temp Med 2010; 36: 65–68.
- 44 Matsumura K, Bae JY, Hyon SH. Polyampholytes as cryoprotective agents for mammalian cell cryopreservation. Cell Transplant 2010; 19:69-699.
- 45 Haneeb AF. Determination of free amino groups in proteins by trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid. Anal Biochem 1966; 14: 328–336.
- 46 Mongondry P, Nicolai T, Tassin JF. Influence of pyrophosphate or polyethylene oxide on the aggregation and gelation of aqueous laponite dispersions. J Colloid Interface Sci 2004; 275: 191–196.
- 47 Stefanescu EA, Stefanescu C, Daly WH, Schimdt G, Negulescu II. Hybrid polymer–clay nanocomposites: A mechanical study on gels and multilayered films. Polymer 2008; 49: 3785–3794.
- 48 Jo YS, Gantz J, Hubell JA, Lutolf MP. Tailoring hydrogel degradation and drug release via neighboring amino acid controlled ester hydrolysis. Soft Matter 2009; 5: 440–446.
- 49 Ma PX. Scaffolds for tissue fabrication. Mater Today 2004; 7: 30–40.
- 50 Atmuri AK, Bhatia SR. Polymer-mediated clustering of charged anisotropic colloids. Langmuir 2013; 29: 3179–3187.
- 51 Baghdadi HA, Sardinha H, Bhatia SR. Rheology and gelation kinetics in laponite dispersions containing poly (ethylene oxide). J Polym Sci Pol Phys 2005; 43: 233–240.
- 52 Haraguchi K, Li HJ, Matsuda K, Takehisa T, Elliott E. Mechanism of forming organic/inorganic network structures during in-situ free-radical polymerization in PNIPA-clay nanocomposite hydrogels. Macromolecules 2005; 38: 3482–3490.
- 53 Ram SE, Artym V, Yamada M. Matrix control of stem cell fate. Cell 2006; 126: 645–647.
- 54 Schexnailder PJ, Gharwar AK, Bartlett RL, II, Seal BL, Schmidt G. tuning cell adhesion by incorporation of charged silicate nanoparticles as cross-linkers to polyethylene oxide. Macromol Biosci 2010; 10: 1416–1423.
- 55 Gaharwar AK, Mihaila SM, Swami A, Patel A, Sant S, Reis RL, Marques AP, Gomes ME, Khademhosseini A. Bioactive silicate nanoplatelets for osteogenic diffrentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Adv Mater 2013; 25: 3329–3336.
- 56 Mihaila SM, Gaharwar AK, Reis RL, Khademhosseini A, Marques AP, Gomes MS. The osteogenic differentiation of SSEA-4 sub-population of human adipose derived stem cells using silicate nanoplatelets. Biomaterials 2014; 35: 9087–9099.